M.J. Kim et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 36 (2013) 96–99
97
N
of the fluorescence intensity at 545 nm that originates from the keto
form of receptor 1 and enhancement at 412 nm, which was assigned
to the enol form of the receptor. These results indicate that the keto
and enol forms of pure receptor 1 are in equilibrium. Zn2+ coordination
led to binding with the enol form and thus, removal of the keto form
from the equilibrium. A comparison of binding of receptor 1 with
Zn2+ (Fig. S2) and titration of receptor 1 with Zn2+ (Fig. 1B) showed
differences in their spectra. The addition of 40 μM of Zn2+ in a single
portion to 10 μM of receptor 1 led to enhanced fluorescence intensity
of receptor 1 at only 440 nm (Fig. S2), while the stepwise addition of
Zn2+ to a solution of receptor 1 had affected the shape and position of
the emission originally at 440 nm. We previously reported a similar
effect highlighting the “tuning of the fluorescence profile of a sensor”
through the addition of the same analyte but varying its time of addition
[18]. The binding constant for the 1.Zn2+complex was calculated to be
H2N
Zn(ClO4)2’ MeOH,
reflux, 68%
N
H
O
O
N
N
Cl
Cl
N
N
N
N
KOH, acetone, reflux,
98%
HO
H
N
N
NH2 H2N
2
3
O
N
N
OH
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
OH
1
7.9 (
[19].
0.9) × 10 M−1 using the Benesi–Hildebrand method (Fig. S3)
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compound 1.
In order to evaluate potential interference from other metal ions for
Zn2+ estimation, a competitive binding test was performed, which
showed that other metal ions did not affect Zn2+ recognition with
receptor 1, as shown in Fig. 2. Although Fig. 1A shows the influence of
several metal ion on the fluorescence profile of 1; however, Fig. 2 advo-
cates no influence of any of these metals ions on the fluorescence profile
of 1 for Zn2+. This highlights the much stronger binding affinity of 1 for
Zn2+ as compare to other metal ions.
In another set of experiments, the impact of different cations on the
fluorescence profile of receptor 1 was tested. These typical experiments
involved the metal recognition properties of receptor 1 by mixing a
10 μM solution of receptor 1 with a metal nitrate salt (40 μM) in
DMSO/CH3CN (1:9, v/v) solvent. The fluorescence spectrum of each so-
lution was measured with excitation at 372 nm. Although most of the
tested metal ions quenched the emission intensity of receptor 1, Zn2+
coordination led to enhanced fluorescence (Figs. 1A and S2). This
enhancement in intensity is due to the greater molecular rigidity of
the complex, which makes non-radiative decay less probable from the
excited state, and coordination from imine linkages, which otherwise
prevails due to cis-trans isomerism.
To confirm the stoichiometry of the 1.Zn2+ complex, a Job's plot
analysis was performed, which showed a 1:1 stoichiometry for the com-
plex (Fig. S4) [20]. CHN analysis also supported the formation of a 1:1
complex. A comparison of IR spectra of receptor 1 and 1.Zn2+ showed
that there were shifts of the imine linkages, \CH_N−, as well as the
\OH band upon complexation with Zn2+ (Fig. S5). It was concluded
that the nitrogen atom of the \CH_N− group and the oxygen atom
of the \OH group were involved in metal coordination. Surprisingly,
the mass spectrum of 1.Zn2+ did not indicate formation of a 1:1 metal
complex as the mass obtained was substantially higher than expected.
This contemplates us to evaluate the metal complex with transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) and results suggested the formation of
nano-aggregates of the metal complex (32–50 nm) (Fig. 3). These
types of metal complex could be expected since receptor 1 has two
well-defined pseudocavities, which are able to form a supramolecular
assembly similar to the one adopted by bi-functional groups [21].
To gain further insight into the sensor activity of receptor 1 for Zn2+
,
a titration was performed with 10 μM of receptor 1 and sequential addi-
tion of Zn2+ (0 –120μM) in DMSO/CH3CN (1:9, v/v) solvent (Fig. 1B).
Successive additions of Zn2+ to receptor 1 solution led to quenching
440nm
A 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
This leads us to conclude that the formation of the (1.Zn2+
)n supra-
molecular assembly occurred as shown in Scheme 2, where the size of
the assembly was dependent on the mixing time of the precursors
-0.2
-0.4
(Fig. S6). The supramolecular assembly of (1.Zn2+
)n was thought to be
an excellent candidate for recognition of anions/dicarboxylic acids/thiols,
since metal coordination could provide better steric orientation and
additional binding sites through electrostatic interactions between the
metal center and an anionic analyte. For the recognition of anionic
-0.6
Ag (I) Ba (II) Cu (II) Co (II) Ca (II)Fe (III) K (I) Mg (II) Ni (II) Na (I) Zn (II) Cd (II)
45
40
35
B
160
140
30
25
20
15
10
5
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
500
550
600
Wavelength (nm)
395
445
495
545
595
645
695
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 1. (A) Fluorescence ratio ((I − I0)/I0) of receptor 1 (10 μM) upon addition of
metal nitrate salts (40 μM) in a DMSO/CH3CN (1:9, v/v) solvent system excited at
372 nm; (B) Changes in fluorescence spectra of receptor 1 (10 μM) in a DMSO/CH3CN
(1:9, v/v) solvent system excited at 372 nm upon consecutive additions of Zn2+ ions
(0–120 μM) (inset represents the decrease in fluorescence intensity around 545 nm).
Fig. 2. Detection of Zn2+ with receptor 1 in the presence of other metal ions (Na+, K+
Mg2+, Ca2+, Ba2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Ag+, Cd2+) in DMSO/CH3CN (1:9, v/v).
,