3526
S. Orenes Lorente et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13 (2005) 3519–3529
(2.23 g, 76%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d = 0.20
(6H, s, SiCH3), 0.99 (9H, s, C(CH3)3), 6.85 (2H, d
J = 9 Hz, 7-CH), 7.34–7.50 (9H, m, ar–CH); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3) d = ꢀ3.9 (SiCH3), 18.7 (10-C), 26.1
(11-CH3), 120.9 (7-CH), 121.2 (70-CH), 128.4 (CH),
128.8 (CH), 132.2 (CH), 133.4 (CH), 140.2 (4-C), 156.0
(8-C).
CH), 127.9 (ar–CH), 128.2 (ar–CH), 129.4 (ar–CH),
135.2 (ar-C), 142.1 (ar-C), 143.5 (ar-C), 157.3 (13-C).
5.1.4. 3-(Biphenyl-4-yl)-2,3-dehydroquinuclidine (5a). 4-
Toluenesulfonic acid (0.492 g, 2.6 mmol) and 2 (0.24 g,
0.86 mmol) were heated under reflux in toluene
(50 mL) for 3 h. using a Dean–Stark water separator.
The toluene was evaporated and the residue dissolved
in 1 M NaOH (50 mL). The aqueous mixture was ex-
tracted with chloroform (2 · 50 mL) and the organic
layer was dried and concentrated to yield a white solid
(0.083 g, 37%); Rf 0.52 (20% MeOH/CHCl3); m/z
(ES+) 261 (M+, 100%); HRMS calculated for C19H20N
([M+H]+) 262.1595, found 262.1596; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.65 (2H, m, 8-CH2), 1.85 (2H,
m, 5-CH2), 2.72 (2H, m, 6-CH2), 3.01 (2H, m, 7-CH2),
3.27 (1H, s, 4-CH), 6.94 (1H, s, 2-CH), 7.31–7.67 (9H,
m, ar–CH); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 28.7 (CH2),
29.6 (4-CH), 49.6 (CH2), 126.6 (2-CH), 127.4 (ar–CH),
127.8 (ar–CH), 129.2 (ar–CH), 136.2 (9-C), 141.1 (10-
C), 146.7 (11-C).
s
5.1.2. 3-(Biphenyl-4-yl)-3-hydroxyquinuclidine (4a). Bu-
Li in cyclohexane (5 mL, 6.4 mmol) was added to a stir-
red solution of 4-bromobiphenyl (1.27 g, 5.4 mmol) in
THF (20 mL) at ꢀ78 ꢁC. The mixture was stirred for
5 min, and a solution of quinuclidin-3-one (0.62 g,
4.9 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added during 20 min.
Stirring was continued at ꢀ78 ꢁC for 30 min and the
mixture allowed to reach room temperature overnight;
2 N HCl (30 mL) was added below 10 ꢁC and the aque-
ous layer washed with Et2O (2 · 50 mL) before the addi-
tion of excess 10 M NaOH to pH 14. The mixture was
extracted with ethyl acetate, which had been heated to
50 ꢁC and the extract allowed to cool, dried and evapo-
rated. TLC of the ethyl acetate residue showed mainly
presence of the starting material. Quinuclidine 2 had re-
mained in the diethyl ether layer. Chromatography over
silica gel with MeOH/CHCl3 (0%!25%) as the eluent
afforded 2 as a white solid (0.343 g, 25%); Rf 0.32
(20% MeOH/CHCl3); mp 165–166 ꢁC; m/z (ES+) 280.1
(M+H+, 100%); HRMS calculated for C19H22NO
([M+H]+) 280.1701, found: 280.1699; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d = 1.47 (3H, m, 4-CH, 8-CH2),
2.18 (2H, m, 5-CH2), 2.72 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, 6-CH2),
3.01 (2H, m, 7-CH2), 3.16 (1H, s), 3.45 (1H, d,
J = 14 Hz, –OH), 7.24–7.52 (9H, m, ar–CH); 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 21.4 (CH2), 22.9 (CH),
32.7 (4-CH), 46.2 (CH2), 47.1 (CH2), 61.8 (2-CH2),
72.5 (3-C), 126.8 (ar–CH), 127.4 (ar–CH), 127.8 (ar–
CH), 129.2 (ar–CH), 140.5 (10-C), 140.8 (11-C), 144.9
(9-C).
5.1.5. 3-(Biphenyl-4-yl-40-hydroxy)-2,3-dehydroquinucl-
idine (5b). 4-Toluenesulfonic acid (0.400 g, 2.1 mmol)
and 3 (0.286 g, 0.70 mmol) were heated under reflux in
toluene (30 mL) for 10 h. The toluene was evaporated
and the residue dissolved in 1 M NaOH (50 mL). The
aqueous mixture was extracted with chloroform
(5 · 50 mL) and the organic layer was dried and concen-
trated to yield a white solid (0.093 g, 48%); Rf 0.30 (40%
MeOH/CHCl3); m/z (ES+) 278 (M+H+, 100%); HRMS
calculated for C19H20NO ([M+H]+) 278.1539, found
1
278.1538; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.54 (2H, m,
8-CH2), 1.75 (2H, m, 5-CH2), 2.59 (2H, m, 6-CH2), 2.95
(2H, m, 7-CH2), 3.17 (1H, s, 4-CH), 3.74 (1H, s, –OH),
6.69 (1H, s, 2-CH), 6.83 (2H, d, J = 9 Hz, 12-CH), 7.26–
7.47 (6H, m, ar–CH); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 27.9
(CH2), 29.4 (4-CH), 49.3 (CH2), 116.1 (2-CH), 125.6
(ar–CH), 127.1 (ar–CH), 128.4 (ar–CH), 132.4 (11-C),
134.6 (ar–CH), 134.8 (ar–CH), 140.9 (10-C), 147.0 (9-
C), 157.0 (13-C).
5.1.3. 3-(Biphenyl-4-yl-40[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)]-3-
hydroxyquinuclidine (4b). BuLi in cyclohexane (3.5 mL,
s
4.1 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 4-bromo-
40[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]biphenyl 1 (0.99 g, 2.7
mmol) in THF (20 mL) at ꢀ78 ꢁC. The mixture was stir-
red for 5 min, and a solution of quinuclidin-3-one
(0.26 g, 2.0 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added during
20 min. Stirring was continued at ꢀ78 ꢁC for 30 min
and the mixture allowed to reach room temperature
overnight. The reaction mixture was reduced to vacuum.
Flash chromatography with MeOH/CHCl3 (0%!20%)
as the eluent afforded 3 as a white solid (0.43 g, 50%);
Rf 0.52 (40% MeOH/CHCl3); m/z (ES+) 279 (M+-
OTBDMS, 100%), 410 (M+, 58%); HRMS calculated
for C25H36NO2Si ([M+H]+) 410.2510, found: 410.2504;
1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) d 0.19 (6H, s, 13-CH3),
0.98 (9H, s, 14-CH3), 1.78 (1H, m, 4-CH), 1.94 (2H,
m, 8-CH2), 2.50 (2H, m, 5-CH2), 3.29 (2H, m, 6-CH2),
3.40 (2H, m, 7-CH2), 3.49 (2H, m, –OH), 3.99 (1H, m,
–OH), 6.88 (2H, d, J = 9 Hz, 12-CH), 7.49 (2H, d,
J = 9 Hz, ar–CH), 7.60 (4H, m, ar–CH); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CD3OD) d ꢀ3.8 (14-CH3), 19.5 (15-C), 20.2
(CH2), 21.4 (CH2), 26.6 (15-CH3), 33.2 (4-CH), 47.2
(CH2), 48.1 (CH2), 60.9 (2-CH2), 72.6 (3-C), 122.0 (12-
6. Enzyme assays
6.1. Cloning of enzyme
To test the potential for inhibition of L. major SQS by
the different compounds, protein extracts of E. coli cells
containing the plasmid pET28a-LmSQS2 were used as
enzyme source. A double truncated L. major SQS pro-
tein, that lacks 16 residues at the N-terminus and 40 at
the C-terminus, was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3)
RP cells. Briefly, the DNA fragment was amplified from
the LmSQS gene and cloned in the pET28a vector
(Novagen). The resulting plasmid was introduced in
bacterial cells; the recombinant truncated L. major
SQS is expressed as a His-tagged fusion protein when
cells are induced with 1 mM IPTG during 2 h at
25 ꢁC. After induction, cells were disrupted by sonica-
tion in a buffer containing 20 mM phosphate buffer
(pH 7.4), 2 mM MgCl2, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM CHAPS,
10% glycerol, 10 mM b-mercaptoethanol and protease