Table 2 Activity of AMDase variantsa
Specific activity/unit mgÀ1
indicating their decisive role in providing the hydrophobic
environment for the decarboxylation. The considerable
increase depended to some degree on the substrate structure
and differed between the model compound of screenings (1d)
and sterically-hindered prochiral a-aryl-a-methylmalonates
(1a–c). Nevertheless, activity improvements of 210 fold
for the G74C/M159L/C188G mutant and 920 fold for the
Y48F/G74C/M159L/C188G mutant are extremely high and
show how efficient protein engineering can be applied for
the optimization of biocatalysts. We were thus able to
rescue a good part of the activity which had been lost to the
inversion of enantioselectivity. In addition, we were able to
considerably improve the stereoselectivity of (S)-selective
variants, giving rise to an attractive catalyst for the production
of profens with excellent enantiopurity and yield under
sustainable conditions.
1a
1b
1c
1d
Variant
G74C/C188S
G74C/C188G
Y48F/G74C/C188G
G74C/M159L/C188G
G74C/Y48F/M159L/C188G
Wild-type
0.0015
0.010
0.014
1.3
0.63
13
0.055
0.46
0.26
9.8
1.7
120
0.023
0.18
0.13
5.1
0.91
66
0.040
0.10
0.82
6.2
24
550
a
The substrate concentration is 20 mM.
Table 3 Enantioselectivity of AMDase variantsa
Enantiomeric excess (%)
2a 2b
98(S) 91(S)
2c
Variant
G74C/C188S
G74C/C188G
Y48F/G74C/C188G
G74C/M159L/C188G
G74C/Y48F/M159L/C188G
Wild-type
91(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(R)
499(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(R)
499(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(S)
499(R)
Notes and references
1 (a) K. Miyamoto and H. Ohta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 4077;
(b) K. Miyamoto and H. Ohta, Eur. J. Biochem., 1992, 210, 475.
2 J. Caldwell, A. J. Hutt and S. Fournel-Gigleux, Biochem.
Pharmacol., 1988, 37, 105.
3 P. J. Harrington and E. Lodewijk, Org. Process Res. Dev., 1997, 1,
72.
a
The ee values of products were determined by chiral-phase HPLC.
activity. This variant had comparatively low enantioselectivity,
suggesting that Ser188 also interacts with the enolate inter-
mediate. The M159L mutation would cause a steric effect at
the a-position of the substrate, thus altering its binding mode.
Moreover, exchanging Tyr48 for Phe would lower the polarity
of the hydrophobic pocket. Both events can further destabilize
the pro-R carboxylate. Surprisingly, the Y48F mutation
increases the activity toward 1d but has a decreasing effect
on the activity of AMDase toward a-aryl-a-methylmalonates
(1a–c). The crystal structure (PDB code 3IXL) indicates that
Tyr48 might form hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of
Ser76 in the oxyanion hole.7 The Y48F mutation conceivably
changes the orientation of Ser76, resulting in unfavorable
substrate binding for decarboxylation.
4 L. Steenkamp and D. Brady, Process Biochem., 2008, 43, 1419.
5 (a) K. Miyamoto, S. Tsuchiya and H. Ohta, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 6256; (b) K. Matoishi, M. Ueda, K. Miyamoto and
H. Ohta, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2004, 27, 161.
6 (a) Y. Ijima, K. Matoishi, Y. Terao, N. Doi, H. Yanagawa and
H. Ohta, Chem. Commun., 2005, 877; (b) Y. Terao, Y. Ijima,
K. Miyamoto and H. Ohta, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2007, 45, 15.
7 R. Obata and M. Nakasako, Biochemistry, 2010, 49, 1963.
8 Y. Terao, K. Miyamoto and H. Ohta, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
2006, 73, 647.
9 K. Okrasa, C. Levy, B. Hauer, N. Baudendistel, D. Leys and
J. Micklefield, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 6609.
10 K. Okrasa, C. Levy, M. Wilding, M. Goodall, N. Baudendistel,
B. Hauer, D. Leys and J. Micklefield, Angew. Chem., 2009, 121,
7827 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 7691).
11 (a) M. Miyazaki, H. Kakidani, S. Hanzawa and H. Ohta, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1997, 70, 2765; (b) R. Kourist, Y. Miyauchi,
D. Uemura and K. Miyamoto, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 557.
12 M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem., 2011, 123, 144 (Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2011, 50, 138).
In conclusion, we have successfully improved the activity
of an artificial (S)-selective AMDase variant by structure-
guided directed evolution. Notably, beneficial amino acid
exchanges from hydrophobic residues Leu40, Val43, Tyr48,
Leu77, Val156 and Met159 bear hydrophobic substitutions,
13 H. Aygun, S. Wojczewski, M. Kircher and S. Rosmus, WO/2005/
¨
078111, 2005.
14 M. T. Reetz, D. Kahakeaw and R. Lohmer, ChemBioChem, 2008,
9, 1797.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7503–7505 7505