Donor-σ-Acceptor Molecules
1650 (s), 1596 (m) cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C63H64N2O4: C, 82.86;
H, 7.06; N, 3.07. Found: C, 82.50; H, 7.21; N, 3.02.
CHCl3. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and concen-
trated by rotary evaporation. The residue was crystallized from
CHCl3 to give 13.3 g (85%), mp 110-112 °C (lit.35 mp 115 °C,
105 °C). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.90 (br s, 2 H), 6.67 (d, J ) 15
Hz, 1 H), 8.02 (d × d, J ) 15 Hz, J ) 4 Hz, 1 H), 8.52 (d, J )
4 Hz, 1 H).
2-Iod o-1,4-ben zen ed ia m in e (18). A slurry of 17 (5.27 g,
20.0 mmol) in 27 mL of conc HCl was warmed in a hot water
bath. To this slurry was added, over 9 min and with stirring,
a solution of 15.8 g (83.3 mmol) of SnCl2 in 27 mL of conc HCl.
After the solid dissolved and the yellow color diminished, the
reaction was allowed to cool for 15 min then was placed on
ice. NaOH (50% aq) was added until the mixture was strongly
basic. The resulting thick mixture was cooled to 5 °C and
filtered. The filtrand was crystallized from water to give 3.03
g (65%), mp 115-116 °C (lit.36 mp 110-111 °C). 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 3.30 (br s, 2 H), 3.68 (br s, 2 H), 6.57 (m, 2 H), 7.04
(d, J ) 4 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 85.3, 116.0, 116.5,
123.6, 139.0, 141.1.
N-(10-Non adecyl)-N′-(2-fer r ocen yleth yl)per ylen e-3,4,9,-
10-bis(d ica r boxim id e) (6). The intermediate 2-ferrocenyl-
ethylamine was prepared as reported by Godillot et al.23
A
mixture of 85 mg of LiAlH4 in 5 mL of anhydrous Et2O was
combined with a solution of 296 mg of anhydrous AlCl3 in 7.5
mL of Et2O. To this was added, with stirring, a slurry of 500
mg of ferroceneacetonitrile in 5 mL of Et2O. After 1 h a small
amount of water was carefully added, followed by 7 mL of 6 N
sulfuric acid and 5 mL of water. The ether layer was separated
and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O, basified with
KOH pellets, diluted with 30 mL of water, and reextracted.
The resulting ether layer was dried over MgSO4 and concen-
trated by rotary evaporation to give 146 mg (29% yield) of
amine, which was used without further purification. 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 1.40 (br s, 2H), 2.44 (t, 2H), 2.76 (t, 2H), 4.04 (m,
9H).
The diimide was prepared from 2-ferrocenylethylamine in
79% yield. The analytical sample was further purified by
recrystallization from toluene and washing with hexanes; mp
214-216 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.80 (t, 6H), 1.18 (m, 28H),
1.86 (m, 2H), 2.22 (m, 2H), 2.74 (m, 2H), 4.10 (s, 2H), 4.20 (s,
7H), 4.36 (m, 2H), 5.15 (m, 1H), 8.55 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (CDCl3)
δ 14.2, 22.8, 27.2, 27.9, 29.4, 29.7, 32.0, 32.5, 41.3, 55.0, 67.6,
68.3, 68.8, 79.3, 85.2, 123.0, 123.1, 123.5, 124.2, 126.2, 126.4,
126.8, 129.3, 129.5, 131.1, 131.3, 131.9, 134.2, 134.6, 163.2,
163.6 (w), 164.6 (w). IR (PE card) 1695 (s), 1658 (s), 1650 (s),
1596 (m) cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C55H60N2O4Fe: C, 76.02 H, 6.96;
N, 3.22. Found: C, 76.06; H, 7.20; N, 3.05.
2-Iod o-N,N,N′,N′-tetr a m eth yl-1,4-ben zen ed ia m in e (16).
A slurry of 18 (1.00 g, 4.27 mmol) and NaBH4 (2.28 g, 60.2
mmol) in 35 mL of THF was added dropwise to a stirred
solution of 7 mL of 3 M H2SO4 and 5 mL of 37% formalin in
35 mL of THF. The pH rose during the addition, and more
sulfuric acid was added periodically to maintain the pH near
1-2. After 2 h, an additional 5 mL of formalin was added and
the reaction was allowed to continue stirring overnight. Solid
KOH was then added to raise the pH above 10. The organic
layer was separated and the aqueous layer extracted twice
with ether. The combined organic layers were dried over
MgSO4 and concentrated by rotary evaporation to yield an oil,
which was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3) to yield
N-(10-Non a d ecyl)-N′-(2-p h en yleth yl)p er ylen e-3,4,9,10-
b is(d ica r b oxim id e) (7). 7 was prepared from phenethyl-
1
1
amine in 72% yield, mp 225-228 °C. H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.80
a light yellow oil, 710 mg (57%). H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.66 (s, 6
(t, 6H), 1.18 (m, 28H), 1.87 (m, 2H), 2.23 (m, 2H), 3.02 (m,
2H), 4.34 (m, 2H), 5.15 (m, 1H), 7.29 (m, 5H), 8.20 (d, 2H),
8.28 (d, 2H), 8.35 (d, 2H), 8.48 (br, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
14.2, 22.8, 27.2, 29.4, 29.7, 32.0, 32.5, 34.3, 42.0, 55.0, 122.96,
123.05, 123.4, 124.1, 125.9, 126.2, 126.3, 126.7, 128.7, 129.2,
129.3, 129.5, 131.0, 131.3, 131.8, 132.3, 134.2, 134.6, 138.8,
163.2, 163.5 (w), 164.6 (w). IR (PE card) 1698 (s), 1651 (s),
1594 (m) cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C51H56N2O4: C, 80.49; H, 7.42;
N, 3.68. Found: C, 80.20; H, 7.12; N, 3.53.
ter t-Bu tyl (3-Br om op r op yl)ca r ba m a te (14). To a sus-
pension of 3-bromopropylammonium bromide (13, 1.00 g, 4.57
mmol) in 20 mL of CHCl3 was added NaHCO3 (390 mg, 4.64
mmol) in 15 mL of water, di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.00 g, 4.58
mmol) in CHCl3, and KBr (1.10 g, 9.24 mmol). The mixture
was refluxed for 18 h and then cooled. The layers were
separated and the aqueous layer was extracted twice with
CHCl3. The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4
and concentrated by rotary evaporation to yield 1.06 g of 14
(96%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.41 (s, 9 H), 2.02 (m, 2 H), 3.23 (m,
2 H), 3.41 (t, 2 H), 4.65 (br s, 1 H), in agreement with the
literature41 spectrum.
H), 2.87 (s, 6 H), 6.70 (d × d, J ) 14 Hz, J ) 5 Hz, 1 H), 7.00
(d, J ) 15 Hz, 1 H), 7.20 (d, J ) 5 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (CDCl3)
δ 41.0, 45.8, 99.9, 113.7, 120.7, 123.7, 144.8, 148.5. Anal. Calcd
for C10H15N2I: C, 41.40; H, 5.21; N, 9.65. Found: C, 41.10; H,
5.43; N, 9.29.
2-(2-Cyan oeth en yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetr am eth yl-1,4-ben zen e-
d ia m in e (19). Into a thick-walled Pyrex tube were placed 1.13
g of 16 (3.90 mmol), acrylonitrile (3.28 g, 61.9 mmol), Et3N
(0.59 g, 5.8 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (40 mg, 0.16 mmol), and PPh3
(0.32 g, 1.3 mmol). The tube was closed with a Teflon plug
and placed in a steam bath overnight. After cooling, water was
added to the mixture, and it was extracted three times with
ether. The organic layers were washed with saturated brine,
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated by rotary evaporation.
The crude product was purified by column chromatography
(CHCl3) to yield a yellow-orange oil, 600 mg (72%), which NMR
analysis indicated to be a 2:1 mixture of E:Z diastereomers.
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.62 (s, 6 H), 2.90 (s, 3 H), 2.93 (s, 3 H),
5.39 (d, J ) 20 Hz, 0.3 H), 5.88 (d, J ) 28 Hz, 0.7 H), 6.71 (d,
J ) 5 Hz, 0.7 H), 6.82 (m, 1 H), 7.03 (m, 1 H), 7.44 (d, J ) 5
Hz, 0.3 H), 7.62 (d, J ) 20 Hz, 0.3 H), 7.85 (d, J ) 28 Hz, 0.7
H). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 41.3, 45.8, 95.3, 110.8, 117.1, 119.3,
119.8, 120.5, 128.5, 128.8, 147.5, 149.2. IR (PE card) 2214 (m)
ter t-Bu tyl (3-Iod op r op yl)ca r ba m a te (15). A solution of
560 mg (2.35 mmol) of 14 and 400 mg (2.67 mmol) of NaI in
acetone was stirred for 16 h at room temperature. The mixture
was then filtered and the filtrate was concentrated by rotary
evaporation. The residue was dissolved in CHCl3, washed with
Na2S2O5, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated by rotary
cm-1
.
2-(2-Cya n oeth yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetr a m eth yl-1,4-ben zen ed i-
a m in e (20). Into a Parr hydrogenation flask were placed 600
mg of 19 (2.79 mmol), 50 mL of EtOH, and a catalytic amount
of 10% Pd/C. After the mixture was shaken overnight under
pressurized H2, the catalyst was filtered off and the EtOH was
concentrated by rotary evaporation to yield 410 mg (67%) of a
colorless oil, which was used without purification in the next
step. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.57 (s, 6 H), 2.67 (t, 13 Hz, 2 H),
2.89 (s, 6 H), 2.98 (t, J ) 13 Hz, 2 H), 6.56 (d, 5 Hz, 1 H), 6.62
1
evaporation to yield 230 mg of 15 (34%). H NMR (CDCl3) δ
1.41 (s, 9 H), 1.97 (m, 2 H), 3.16 (m, 4 H), 4.62 (br s, 1 H), in
agreement with the literature42 spectrum.
2-Iod o-4-n it r oa n ilin e (17). A mixture of iodine (8.09 g,
31.9 mmol), p-nitroaniline (8.08 g, 58.5 mmol), chlorobenzene
(6 mL), and water (25 mL) was heated to 90 °C. Hydrogen
peroxide (3% aq, 77 g) was added dropwise over a 15-min
period. The mixture was heated to reflux for 25 h, and then
was cooled, basified with NaOH pellets, and extracted with
(d × d, J ) 14 Hz, J ) 5 Hz, 1 H), 7.09 (d, J ) 14 Hz, 1 H). 13
C
NMR (CDCl3) δ 18.5, 28.6, 41.1, 46.2, 112.6, 114.4, 120.2, 121.9,
134.9, 143.0, 148.0. IR (PE card) 2247 (w) cm-1. The analytical
sample was purified by successive column chromatographies,
first with 100:4:1 CHCl3:EtOH:NH3(aq), then with 100:1
CHCl3:NH3(aq) (dried over MgSO4), and finally with CH2Cl2.
(41) Lee, B. H.; Miller, M. J . J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 24-31.
(42) Ensch, C.; Hesse, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 1659-1673.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 26, 2003 10065