Organic Letters
Letter
Table 2. Cycloaddition of 1 with 1,1-Dicyanoalkenes 2
Scheme 2. Reduction of Imino Group of 3
b
c
product 3 yield of 3 yield of 3
a
entry
R
R′
or (3′)
(%)
(%)
1
2
n-Bu (1a) Ph (2a)
a
89
79
80
75
p-NO2C6H4
(2b)
b
3
p-ClC6H4
(2c)
c
93
84
4
5
p-FC6H4 (2d)
d
e
71 (3 h)
52 (3 h)
65
47
Scheme 3. Plausible Catalytic Cycle
p-CH3C6H4
(2e)
6
7
8
9
PMP (2f)
Nphth (2g)
furyl (2h)
f
53
48
48
66
40
g
h
i
50 (3 h)
73
PhCH2CH2
(2i)
46 (24 h)
10
11
12
CH2tol-p
(1b)
Ph (2a)
3j (3a′)
3k (3c′)
3l (3a′)
66 (24 h)
58 (24 h)
76 (3 h)
62
50
73
p-ClC6H4
(2c)
c-Hex (1c) Ph (2a)
a
1 (0.8 mmol), 2 (0.5 mmol), THF (1 mL), Bu2SnI2 (0.05 mmol).
Determined by H NMR based on 2. Isolated yield.
b
c
1
reactions of 1a with 2a−2i proceeded well at 25 °C, and cyclic
products 3a−3i were formed (entries 1−9). In these cases,
various functionalities could be introduced on the aromatic
rings of 2 (entries 1−6). Naphthyl substituted alkene 2g gave
3g (entry 7). Furyl-substituted alkene 2h was also useful and
gave 3h (entry 8). Besides aromatic alkenes, aliphatic 2i was
reactive and gave 3i (entry 9). In a similar manner, a reaction
using N-arylmethyl-substituted substrate 1b underwent the
desired reactions (entries 10 and 11). Even the use of bulky
cyclohexyl-substituted 1c underwent the reaction well (entry
12).
and enones were unreactive because of the lack of electrophilic
nature and were recovered quantitatively. The nucleophilicity of
tin enamine A was insufficient because of electron-withdrawing
ability of the halogen substituent in A. Bu2SnBr2 or LiBr
catalyst showed no catalytic activity (Table 1 entries 4 and 5).
Thus the electron-withdrawing property of bromide substituent
decreases the nucleophilicity of A. Finally, the resultant
nucleophilic Sn−C bond of B causes C-alkylation to afford 4-
cyclopentan-2-imine 3, regenerating the tin iodide catalyst.
We next attempted the use 2-alkylidene aziridine 1d
including an internal (Z)-alkene (Scheme 4). The reactions
with 1,1-dicyanoalkenes, 2a and 2c, proceeded well, and α-
methyl-substituted cyclopentanones 5a and 5b were isolated as
major products, accompanying the minor ones, 6a and 6b. The
major products of 5 were obtained through the tin enamine C
that was derived from the SN2 attack of the Sn−I bond toward
the aziridine ring. On the other hand, the minor products of 6
were formed through the enamine E that was derived from the
SN2′ attack of the Sn−I bond toward the CC bond. The SN2′
attack is known to be a minor process in the ring-opening of a
simple 2-methyleaziridine.15 It is worth noting that major
products 5a and 5b were obtained as single trans-isomers, the
stereochemistry of which was determined by NOE study. Thus,
in the reaction of (Z)-enamine C with 2, passage of the
sterically less-hindered 8-membered cyclic transition state
TS(I) was favored over that of TS(II).16,17 As a result, threo-
adduct D was formed selectively and underwent cyclization to
give 5. Minor products, regioisomers 6a and 6b, were single cis-
isomers, the stereochemistry of which was determined by NOE
study.18
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, although the desired reactions
proceeded well, products 3 had imine groups and were easily
hydrolyzed during the treatment by column chromatography.
Hence, cyclopentanone derivatives 3′ were obtained as pure
products. In the examples shown in Table 2, entries 10 and 11,
the initially obtained 3j and 3k were hydrolyzed to 3a′ and 3c′,
respectively. These isolated products corresponded to entries 1
and 3. In the case of entry 12, the product 3l was also converted
to 3a′. So nitrogen functionalities were lost from the
cycloadducts 3. For the fixation of nitrogen functionalities, we
tried a reduction of the imino groups of 3 (Scheme 2). Without
workup, the resultant reaction mixtures that included 3a, 3j,
12
and 3l were allowed to react with a reductant NaBH(OAc)3
at rt for 18 h. As a result, amines, 4a, 4j, and 4l, respectively,
were obtained as nitrogen-containing products with high
diastereoselectivities.13
Scheme 3 shows a plausible catalytic cycle for the tin-
catalyzed reaction of 1 with 2. Initially, tin enamine A is formed
by the attack of Sn−I toward 2-methyleneaziridine 1.14 Because
of the ring strain of 1, the ring-opening proceeds effectively.
Next, the Michael addition of A to 2 takes place to give adduct
B (C-attack). For the Michael addition, using highly electro-
philic CC bonds like 1,1-dicyano alkenes 2 was essential.
Other alkenes such as monocyanoalkenes, unsaturated esters,
Scheme 5 shows the reaction using C3-substituted 2-
methyleneaziridine 1e. The reactions with 1,1-dicyanoalkenes
2a and 2c proceeded well to give major products 7a and 7b
accompanying minor products 8a and 8b. Contrary to the
above case using 1d, the SN2′ attack of the Sn−I bond toward
1193
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol500062a | Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1192−1195