1472
F. Hu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 1471–1474
solutions according to previous studies;8–10 (ii) it is well known
that H2O2 can stoichiometrically convert phenylboronic ester
moiety into the phenol group.5c,11 Thus, incubation of hydrogen
peroxide with 1 should result in oxidation of the phenylboronic
pinacolester, followed by hydrolysis and 1,6-elimination of p-qui-
none-methide to yield the p-pyridine substituted TPE (2,
Scheme 1). Compound 2 is expected to show low solubility in
aqueous solutions, thus aggregation will occur and turn on the
fluorescence of TPE moiety based on the aggregation-induced
emission (AIE) feature of TPE compounds.8–10 In this way, com-
pound 1 can be employed for the fluorescence turn-on detection
of H2O2 in aqueous solutions. The results reveal that 1 exhibits high
selectivity toward H2O2. Moreover, by combining the cascade
enzymatic (oxidation of D
-glucose with GOx to produce H2O2)12
and chemical (oxidation of phenylboronic ester by H2O2) reactions,
compound 1 is successfully utilized for the selective detection of
D-glucose in aqueous solution.
The synthesis of started from monobromo-substituted
1
Figure 1. Fluorescence spectra of 1 (5.0 lM) after incubation with different
amounts of H2O2; the reaction was performed at 37 °C for 60 min in 10 mM HEPES
buffer at pH 7.4; the excitation wavelength was 390 nm; inset shows photos of the
tetraphenylethylene derivative (3) as shown in Scheme 2. Palla-
dium-catalyzed Suzuki coupling reactions between compound 3
and 4-pyridinylboronic acid yielded compound 2, which was
allowed to react with 4-(bromomethyl) benzene boronic pinacol
ester to afford 1 in 95.6% yield. The chemical structure of 1 was
characterized with 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectra (detailed
procedures are given in Supplementary data).13
solution of 1 (5.0
lM) before (A) and after (B) incubation with 150.0 lM of H2O2
under UV light (365 nm).
As expected, compound 1 is soluble in water, and the HEPES
buffer solution (10 mM, pH = 7.4) of 1 (5.0 lM) can be easily pre-
pared. Figure 1 shows the fluorescence spectra of 1 before and after
addition of different amounts of H2O2. As anticipated, the aqueous
solution of 1 (5.0 lM) was almost non-emissive in the absence of
H2O2 (see Fig. 1, curve a). However, after incubation with H2O2 at
37 °C the fluorescence intensity of 1 increased gradually concomi-
tant with the emission peak progressively blue-shifting from 610
to 510 nm.14 For instance, the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm
(see Fig. 1, curve b) increased by more than 260 times after the
solution of 1 was incubated with 150.0
fact, the fluorescence quantum yield of the HEPES buffer solution
(10 mM, pH = 7.4) of 1 (5.0 M) increased from 0.006 to 0.121
(by reference to quinine hemisulfate monohydrate) after H2O2
(150.0 M) was introduced. Such fluorescence enhancement can
lM of H2O2 for 30 min. In
l
l
be distinguished with naked-eye as shown in the inset of Figure 1,
where photos of solutions of 1 in the absence and presence of H2O2
under UV light (365 nm) illumination are displayed. Figure 2 de-
picts the plot of the relative fluorescence intensity (I/I0 ꢁ 1) at
510 nm versus concentration of H2O2. Interestingly, the fluores-
cence intensity of 1 increases almost linearly with the concentra-
Figure 2. The plot of (I/I0 ꢁ 1) at 510 nm versus the concentration of hydrogen
peroxide; inset shows the linear relation for concentration of hydrogen peroxide in
the range of 10.0–110.0 lM.
inset of Figure 2. Accordingly, the detection limit of H2O2 was
estimated to be 180.0 nM (n = 11 and S/N = 3).
tion of H2O2 in the range of 10.0–110.0 lM as displayed in the
Moreover, fluorescence responses of 1 to other reactive oxygen
species were examined. As depicted in Figure 3, significant fluores-
cence enhancement was observed only after incubation with H2O2.
Other ROS, such as singlet oxygen, hydroxy radical, superoxide
anion, and nitric oxide etc., induced only negligible fluorescence
enhancement for 1 under the same conditions. Thus, compound
1 shows high selectivity toward H2O2.
As illustrated in Scheme 1, such fluorescence enhancement is
attributed to the aggregation of compound 2 which is generated
from the oxidation reaction of 1 with H2O2. The formation of fluo-
rescent aggregates was confirmed by both confocal laser scanning
microscopic (CLSM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies. As
displayed in Figure 4, there were almost no fluorescent aggregates
for the solution of 1 (10.0
ever, fluorescent aggregates emerged after incubation with H2O2
(200.0 M) based on the CLSM images. DLS data (see Fig. 5) also
indicated the formation of aggregates of 200–600 nm for the
solution of 1 (5.0 M) after incubation with H2O2 (200.0 M).
lM) before incubation with H2O2; how-
l
l
l
Scheme 2. Synthetic approach to compound 1.