Organic Letters
Letter
P(Ad)3, common electron-rich ligands, were employed in the
presence of Fe(OAc)2, neither aromatic amine 1a bearing the
directing group nor 1b containing a traceless directing pyridyl
group produced the corresponding borylated product. With
enhanced reactivity of the C−N bond, the amine 1c containing
an electron-deficient Boc group generated the desired
compound in a 9% yield (Scheme 2). Different cyclic amides
Scheme 3. Representative Results for the Optimization of
the Iron-Catalyzed Borylation of 2e
a
Scheme 2. Optimization of the Reaction of Aryl Amine with
a
B2pin2
a
Reaction conditions (unless otherwise specified): Aryl ether (0.2
mmol), B2pin2 (0.4 mmol), [Fe] (5 mol %), Ligand (10 mol %), Base
b
(2.5 equiv), Solvent (2.0 mL), 120 °C, 12 h. NMR yield using
mesitylene as an internal standard. The isolated yield is shown in
parentheses.
a
were investigated employing P(t-Bu)3 as the ligand. The five-
member ring amide 1f showed the highest reactivity, resulting
in the corresponding product in 21% yield, which was in
agreement with those previously reported works (Scheme 2).4
Installing two electron-deficient groups onto the amine led to
the decomposition of substrates 1d and 1h, and only trace
amounts of the desired products were obtained (Scheme 2).
These results suggest that electron-rich ligands could promote
the borylation reaction when relatively reactive amides 1c and
1f were used as substrates, albeit with low efficiency (Scheme
borylation of C−N bonds catalyzed by iron is challenging in
the absence of Grignard reagents, as the C−N bonds are
challenging to undergo oxidative addition owing to the high
bond dissociation energy.11
Encouraged by these results, we envisioned that the
borylation of C−O bonds via iron catalysis should be more
feasible. Therefore, we turned our attention to the readily
available aryl ethers. The nickel-catalyzed transformation of
enol ethers to olefins was demonstrated by the Wenkert group
in 1979.12 To our knowledge, the construction of the C−
heteroatom bond from aryl ethers catalyzed by iron was not
reported. An important example of reductive cleavage of ether
C−O bond by iron catalyst was reported by the Wang group,13
in which a high temperature of 140−180 °C was required.
Inspired by the studies from the Kakiuchi5 and Snieckus
groups,14 the aryl ethers bearing a directing group, 2a, 2b, and
2c, were first investigated. No desired products were observed
after evaluation of some electron-rich phosphine ligands, such
as P(Cy)3, P(t-Bu)3, and P(Ad)3 in the presence of Fe(OAc)2
(Scheme 3). When the pyridyl group was used as a directing
group,15 2d did not undergo the borylation (Scheme 3). The
2-pyridyloxy group has been commonly used in the C−H bond
functionalization reactions,16 but there are no efficient
methods to remove the pyridine ring,17 thus limiting its
practical applications. The removal of the pyridine ring from
the 2-pyridyloxy moiety usually requires two steps: (i) N-
methylation with a strong methylating reagent and (ii)
cleavage of the C−O bond using a strong base. Therefore,
the development of an efficient method for direct borylation of
2-pyridyloxy via iron catalysis would be highly appealing.18 To
our delight, 2-pyridyl ether 2e indeed underwent the
borylation, providing the corresponding product in 32% yield
in the presence of P(Cy)3 (Scheme 3, entry 1). Other iron
sources were also tested. Fe(OAc)2 and Fe(acac)3 could
provide the product in moderate to good yields (Scheme 3,
entries 2−3). This reaction was very sensitive to inorganic
bases, and only strong bases, such as t-BuOLi and t-BuONa,
could efficiently promote this transformation (for details, see
ether and dioxane, also provided the corresponding product in
moderate yields, but toluene stood out as the best (Scheme 3,
entries 6−8). After investigating various ligands, 88% isolated
yield was provided with t-BuXPhos (Scheme 3, entry 9).
Control experiments demonstrated the importance of both
ligand and iron species. No desired product was observed
without the use of an iron catalyst or ligand (Scheme 3, entries
10−11).
We then set out to examine the scope of the reaction (Table
1). When naphthyl ethers were employed, the transformation
proceeded smoothly and provided the borylated products in
moderate to good yields (2ee−13ee, 47%−88%). Functional
groups, such as methoxy, amine, morpholyl, and fluoro, were
well-tolerated (3ee, 7ee−10ee). Substrate 4e containing an
electron-rich methoxy group at the 4-position on the ring
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX