4
Tetrahedron
spectroscopy. The J-value of the two styryl protons in products
In conclusion, we have described an efficient approach for
the regio-and stereoselective addition of imidazoles (electron-
deficient heterocycle) onto alkynes to provide a broad range of
synthetically and biologically important (Z)- and (E)-imidazolyl
enamines selectively in good yields. This transition-metal and
ligand-free methodology utilizes a basic system of KOH/DMSO
for the addition of imidazoles onto alkynes. The competitive
experiments clearly demonstrates that imidazole is less reactive
than pyrrole and more reactive than aniline. From a synthetic
point of view, the developed approach is general, cost effective
and could be used for the synthesis of vide range of imidazolyl
enamines of biological importance.
3a−q lies between 8.0−9.5 Hz which supports the Z-
stereoselectivity in the products; however products 4a−d with
coupling constant between 14.6−16.7 Hz conforms the E-
stereoselectivity in the addition products (Figure 4).
Scheme 2. Hydroamination with dialkyne.
Acknowledgments
We further explore the possibility of the reaction with a
dialkyne. More fascinatingly, when 1,4-diethynylbenzene 5 was
reacted with 4.0 equiv of 1a using KOH (40 mol %) at 120 °C,
for 3.5 h, the thermodynamically stable 1,4-bis((E)-2-(1H-
imidazol-1-yl)vinyl)benzene 6 was obtained in 49% yield
(Scheme 2). Reaction monitoring at incessant interval of time
showed that the addition of the imidazole onto alkyne takes place
very rapidly, leading to the transformation of kinetically stable Z-
isomer to thermodynamically stable E-isomer followed by the
attack on another alkyne group present in the substrate 5.
In order to validate the reactivity behavior of the imidazole
1a and pyrrole 7 on alkyne, we performed a control experiment.
We carried out the reaction of 1a (2.0 equiv), pyrrole (2.0 equiv),
with alkyne 2c (1 mmol) using 20 mol % of KOH in 2 mL of
DMSO at 120 °C for 15 min (Scheme 3). The results demonstrate
that the product 9 (addition of pyrrole on alkyne) was obtained in
72% yield, whereas product 3c (addition of imidazole on alkyne)
was formed only in 6% yield. This clearly reveals that imidazole
1a is less reactive than pyrrole and afforded the products in lower
yields along with unreacted alkyne. When the hydroamination
was performed using internal alkyne 8, imidazole fails to afford
the desired addition product 10; however highly reactive pyrrole
gave the hydroaminated product 11 in 73 % yield.
We thank CSIR and DU-DST-PURSE grant for the financial
support and USIC, University of Delhi for the use of
Instrumentation facility. MP and RKS are thankful to DST and
UGC for Fellowship.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
125.
References and notes
(1)
(a) Chen, P.; Barrish, J. C.; Iwanowicz, E.; Lin, J.; Bednarz, M.S.;
Chen, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4293; (b) Greenhill, J. V.; Lue,
P. Prog. Med. Chem. 1993, 30, 203; (c) Sullivan, J. D.; Giles, R. L.;
Looper, R. E. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2009, 5, 39; (d) Iradyan, M. A.;
Iradyan, N. S.; Arsenyan, F. G.; Stepanyan, G. M. Pharm. Chem. J.
2009, 43, 439; (d) Jin, Z. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 382; (e) Ebada, S.
S.; Proksch, P. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 225.
(2)
(a) Kobayashi, J.; Ishibashi, M. Alkaloids 1992, 41, 41; (b)
Kobayashi, J. Ishibashi, M. Compr. Nat. Prod Chem. 1999, 8, 415;
(c) Blunt, J. W.; Copp B. R.; Keyzers, R. A. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013,
30, 237; (d) Berlinck, R. G. S.; Burtoloso, A. C. B.; Silva, A. E.;
Romminger, S.; Morais, R. P.; Bandeira, K.; Mizuno, C. M. Nat.
Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 1382.
(3)
Grimmett, M. R. Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II;
Katritsky, A. R.; Scriven, E. F. V., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford. 1996, 3,
77.
(4)
(5)
Luca, L. D. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1.
Bhandari, K.; Srinivas, N.; Keshava, G.B.S.; Shukla, P. K. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 437.
Scheme 3. Competitive study between pyrrole and imidazole.
(6)
(a) Niwano, Y.; Seo, A.; Kanai, K.; Hamaguchi, H.; Uchida, K.;
Yamaguchi, H. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 2204. (b)
Di Santo, R.; Tafi, A.; Costi, R.; Botta, M.; Artico, M.; Corelli, F.;
Forte, M.; Caporuscio, F.; Angiolella, L.; Palamara, A. T. J. Med.
Chem. 2005, 48, 5140; (c) Botta, M.; Corelli, F.; Gasparrini, F.;
Messina, F.; Mugnaini, C. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4736. (d) Saha, A.
K.; Liu, L.; Simoneaux, R. L.; Kukla, M. J.; Marichal, P.; Odds, F.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2175.
To further confirm the reactivity behavior between
imidazole 1a and arylamine 12 we performed another control
experiment. We carried out the reaction of 1a (1 mmol), aniline
12 (1 mmol), with alkyne 2i (1 mmol) using 20 mol % of KOH in
2 mL of DMSO at 120 °C for 1.5 h (Scheme 4). The results
demonstrate that the product 3i (addition of imidazole on alkyne)
was obtained in 80% yield, whereas product 13 (addition of
aniline on alkyne) was not formed. This clearly reveals that
hydroamination of imidazole is preferred over arylamine.
(7)
(a) Katritzky A. R.; Rees. Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry,
1984, 5, 469; (b) Grimmett, M. R. Imidazole Benzimidazole
Synthesis Academic Press 1997; (c) Brown, E. G. Ring Nitrogen and
Key Biomolecules. Kluwer Academic Press, 1998; (d) Pozharskii,
A.F, et al. Heterocycles in Life and Society. John Wiley & Sons. 1997.
(e) Congiu, C.; Cocco, M. T.; Onnis, V. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett.
2008, 18, 989; (f) Venkatesan, A. M.; Agarwal, A.; Abe T.;
Ushirogochi, H.O.; Santos, D.; Li, Z.; Francisco, G.; Lin, Y. I.;
Peterson, P.J.; Yang, Y.; Weiss, W. J.; Shales, D. M.; Mansour, T.S.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 1890; (g) Nakamura, T.; Kakinuma,
H.; Umemiya, H.; Amada, H.; Miyata, N.; Taniguchi, K.; Bando, K.;
Sato, M. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 333; (h) Han, M. S.;
Kim, D. H. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1425; (i) Roman,
Scheme 4. Competitive study between imidazole and aniline.