Optimization of solid-supported Glaser-Hay reactions in the microwave

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules20045276

The translation of organometallic reactions into a microwave reactor has numerous advantages. Herein, we describe the application of a previously developed solid-supported Glaser-Hay reaction to microwave conditions. Overall, an array of diynes has been prepared demonstrating the ability to conduct chemoselective reactions in the microwave within 20 min compared to the 16 h thermal conditions. Moreover, non-microwave transparent alkynes have been found to react more quickly, preventing catalyst quenching, and resulting in higher yields.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules20045276

Molecules 2015, 20, 5276-5285; doi:10.3390/molecules20045276
OPEN ACCESS
molecules
ISSN 1420-3049
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Communication
Optimization of Solid-Supported Glaser-Hay Reactions in
the Microwave
Jessica S. Lampkowski, Johnathan C. Maza, Sanjana Verma and Douglas D. Young *
Department of Chemistry, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187,
USA; E-Mails: jslampkowski@email.wm.edu (J.S.L.); jcmaza@email.wm.edu (J.C.M.);
sverma01@email.wm.edu (S.V.)
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: dyoung01@wm.edu;
Tel.: +1-757-221-2539.
Academic Editor: Fernando Albericio
Received: 13 February 2015 / Accepted: 18 March 2015 / Published: 24 March 2015
Abstract: The translation of organometallic reactions into a microwave reactor has numerous
advantages. Herein, we describe the application of a previously developed solid-supported
Glaser-Hay reaction to microwave conditions. Overall, an array of diynes has been prepared
demonstrating the ability to conduct chemoselective reactions in the microwave within
20 min compared to the 16 h thermal conditions. Moreover, non-microwave transparent
alkynes have been found to react more quickly, preventing catalyst quenching, and
resulting in higher yields.
Keywords: microwave irradiation; solid-support; Glaser-Hay
1. Introduction
The Glaser-Hay reaction involves the coupling of terminal alkynes to afford polyynes in good to
excellent yields [1–4]. These polyynes are found in various applications ranging from biologically
active natural products to optical materials [5–8]. A substantial hurdle to the widespread application of
the Glaser-Hay reaction in synthetic organic chemistry is its lack of chemoselectivity, as the coupling
of two unique terminal alkynes typically results in a mixture of homodimer and heterodimer products
(Figure 1). While some chemoselective alkyne couplings have been elucidated, the simplicity of the
Glaser-Hay reaction makes it a desirable choice in the synthesis of polyynes [9–15]. To this end, we

Molecules 2015, 20
5277
have recently reported the chemoselective Glaser-Hay reaction via the immobilization of one terminal
alkyne [16,17]. Immobilization of the alkyne precludes its homodimerization, and dimerization of the
soluble alkyne can be rapidly washed away. This affords a facile synthesis of the heterodimeric
product in good yields and excellent purities.
Figure 1. Chemoselectivity of the Glaser-Hay reaction.
While the previous chemoselective reaction involving the solid support is useful, the 16 h reaction
time is synthetically limiting when preparing large libraries of molecules. To overcome this issue, we
set forth to investigate the potential rate enhancement that could be obtained by the utilization of
microwave chemistry. Microwave irradiation induces molecular motion via the alignment of ions or
dipoles with the oscillating electromagnetic field, and has been demonstrated to increase reaction
yields and to decrease reaction times [18,19]. Because the microwaves interact directly with the
reagents and solvent, instead of by convection, they afford efficient heating of the reactions, cleaner
reaction conditions, and in some cases, facilitate reactions that are not achievable by conventional
thermal heating [20,21]. By translating the previously described Glaser-Hay reaction to the microwave,
we aim to increase its synthetic utility even further. Previous research has successfully translated
a Glaser-Hay macrocyclization to the microwave, resulting in the standard reaction time of 48 h to be
decreased to 1–6 h [22]. Similarly, we aim to decrease the reaction times of the reported solid-supported
Glaser-Hay coupling from 16 h to 10–20 min.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Optimization of Microwave Conditions
Translation of the previously developed solid-supported Glaser-Hay reaction to the microwave was
initiated utilizing a propargyl alcohol immobilized resin and phenylacetylene as a soluble alkyne due
to the rapid monitoring of the reaction via TLC analysis and UV detection. While other solvents
including DCM, acetone, and toluene were briefly investigated, THF was found to be optimal under
microwave conditions. This correlated to the previously optimized thermal conditions and was ideal
due to the microwave transparency of THF. Microwave conditions were assessed under varying
irradiation times in both power mode (100, 200 and 300 W) and in temperature mode with set
temperatures. Interestingly, when attempted in power mode at any setting for 5–20 min, little diyne product
was detected. When examining the temperature profiles, temperatures ranging from 140–180 °C were

Molecules 2015, 20
5278
observed. At these temperatures it is possible that resin degradation may be occurring, resulting in
diminished yields. Consequently, we shifted our focus to temperature mode, which involves pre-setting
a maximum temperature the reaction can reach, and varying the reaction times. Temperatures between
40 °C and 100 °C were examined with irradiation times of 5–20 min (Table 1).
Table 1. Microwave Optimization of the Glaser-Hay Reaction.
Temperature (°C)
Time (min)
Yield (%)
40
60
20
5
0
26
74
12
77
77
0
60
10
5
80
80
10
20
5
80
100
100
10
63
Based on these preliminary results, it appears that a minimum of 10 min of reaction time is required
in order to yield significant product independent of temperature conditions. Prolonged reaction times
did not increase product yield. Optimal conditions were observed when irradiating for 10 min at 80 °C,
affording a 77% yield after resin cleavage. Increased temperatures resulted in decreased yields perhaps
due to resin or catalyst degradation under microwave conditions. However, these conditions represent
a significant time enhancement relative to the previously developed thermal conditions that required 16 h
of reaction time.
2.2. Comparison to Thermal Conditions
With optimized conditions in hand, the direct comparison of thermal conditions to the microwave
was assessed. Using a series of commercially available alkynes, an array of diynes was prepared and
their yields were compared to that obtained by thermal reaction at 60 °C for 16 h. Reactions were
performed with alkynes harboring a range of chemical functionality including aromatic rings (1, 3, and
4), aliphatic chains (2), ethers (3), basic residues (4, 5), and alcohols (6) with the propargyl alcohol
derivatized resin to yield a series of diynes (7–12). Interestingly, the previous conditions were not
found to be optimal for all soluble alkynes, perhaps due to their differential absorbance of microwave
irradiation. Thus, increasing reaction times to 20 min seemed to afford maximal results and enhanced
yields (Table 2).

Molecules 2015, 20
Table 2. Propargyl Alcohol Derivatized Resin Glaser-Hay Reactions.
5279
1) CuI/TMEDA
THF
Thermala or MWb
HO
O
R
R
2) 2% TFA, DCM, rt, 1 h
% Yield
Thermal a
%Yield
Microwave b
Alkyne
Product
95%
84%
77%
67%
75%
99%
55%
90%
40%
99%
92%
90%
a 60 °C, 16 h; b 80 °C, 20 min.
The assembly of the diyne library demonstrated several important factors must be considered when
using the microwave in this technology. Overall, microwave yields were good to excellent
(67%–92%), but were highly dependent on the soluble alkyne. In the case of incomplete reaction,
starting materials were removed via filtration through a silica plug. Alkynes with basic, coordinating
moieties (4–5) were obtained in higher yields in the microwave relative to the thermal conditions. We
hypothesize this is due to the rate enhancement in the microwave affording catalysis prior to catalyst
poisoning by soluble alkyne coordination to the copper catalyst. Additionally, somewhat nonpolar
alkynes (1–3) appear to be less reactive under microwave irradiation, resulting in lower yields than
thermal conditions. Attempts to extend reaction times in these cases did not result in any increase of
diyne product.
Due to the differences in soluble alkynes, we also investigated the influence of the immobilized
alkyne via derivitization of the trityl chloride resin with 4-ethynyl benzyl alcohol. This resin was then
reacted with the same set of soluble alkynes employed with the propargyl alcohol resin. Using the
previously described microwave conditions resulted in substantial amounts of unreacted alkyne on the
resin, requiring further optimization of conditions. Ultimately, this resin was found to be highly

Molecules 2015, 20
5280
adsorbing of microwave irradiation, heating much more rapidly than the propargyl alcohol resin. This
resulted in very low microwave input into the reactions. To rectify this, the reaction was subjected to 2 min
pulses at 120 °C for a total of 20 min (Table 3). Each pulse heats the reaction to 120 °C for a 2-min
interval, followed by cooling to room temperature prior to resubmission to microwave irradiation.
Table 3. Ethynyl Benzyl Alcohol Derivatized Resin Glaser-Hay Reactions.
% Yield
Thermal a
%Yield
Microwave b
Alkyne
Product
96%
98%
78%
76%
73%
53%
76%
86%
96%
40%
86%
86%
a 60 °C, 16 h; b 120 °C, 2 min × 10 pulses.

Molecules 2015, 20
5281
The series of diynes (13–18) were obtained in good to excellent yield, ranging from 76%–86%.
Similar to results obtained with the propargyl alcohol resin, soluble terminal alkynes with a degree of
polarity afforded higher yields under microwave conditions than observed under thermal conditions.
Also, the ethynyl benzyl alcohol resin demonstrated the need to optimize reaction conditions for alkynes
of differing reactivity and microwave transparency. Interestingly, the thermal yields of the reaction
with the catalyst coordinating alkyne 5 were higher, unlike reactions observed on the propargyl alcohol
resin. This observation may be reflective of the decreased reactivity of the ethynyl benzyl alcohol resin
no longer aiding the previously observed microwave enhancement in the presence of this type of
soluble alkyne.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. General
Solvents and reagents were obtained from either Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Fisher
Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) and used without further purification, unless noted. Tritylchloride
resin, 100–200 mesh, 1% DVB crosslinking, was purchased from Advanced Chemtech. (Louisville, KY,
USA) Microwave reactions were performed in a CEM Discover System. Reactions were conducted
under ambient atmosphere with non-distilled solvents. NMR data was acquired on a Varian Gemini
400 MHz. Compound purities were assessed by NMR and found to be 90% or greater for all compounds.
3.2. Alkyne Immobilization Protocol
Trityl chloride resin (200 mg, 0.36 mmol, 1 equiv.) and dichloromethane (5 mL) were added to
a flame-dried vial. The resin was swelled at room temperature with gentle stirring for 15 min. The
alkyn-ol (~1.2 equiv.) was added to reaction, followed by triethylamine (10.0 µL, 0.072 mmol,
0.2 equiv.). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The resin was transferred to
a syringe filter and washed with DCM and MeOH (5 alternating rinses with 5 mL each). The resin was
swelled in CH2Cl2 and dried under vacuum for 45 min before further use.
3.3. General Glaser-Hay Coupling Protocol
Soluble alkyne (0.70 mmol, 10 equiv.) was added to a flame dried microwave vial containing the
propargyl alcohol derivitized trityl resin (100 mg, 0.07 mmol, 1 equiv.), and tetrahydrofuran (2.0 mL).
Copper iodide (10 mg, 0.53 mmol.) and tetramethylethylenediamine (50 µL, 0.33 mmol.) were added
to a separate flame-dried vial then dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (2.0 mL). The catalyst mixture was
then added to the resin in one portion and placed in the microwave reactor to run for the allotted time
in temperature mode at a specific temperature. The completed reaction was transferred to a syringe
filter and washed with DCM and MeOH (5 alternating rinses with 5 mL each). The product was then
cleaved from the resin by treatment with 2% TFA (DCM, 1 mL, 1 h) and filtered into a vial. Product
was analyzed via 1H-NMR and GCMS.

Molecules 2015, 20
5282
3.4. Analytical Data
Compound 7: same as below: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 7 as a solid
1
(6 mg, 0.039 mmol, 77%). H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): ∂ 7.49 (t, J = 5.9, 2H), 7.34–7.26 (m, 3H),
4.45 (s, 2H), 1.94 (s, 1H); GCMS (Rt = 9.20 min) calculated for C11H8O 156.1, found 156.2.
Compound 8: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 8 as a solid (5 mg, 0.034 mmol,
67%) 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): ∂ 4.32 (s, 2H), 2.29 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.52 (m, 2H), 1.42 (sextet,
J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.23 Hz, 3H); GCMS (Rt = 7.29 min) calculated for C9H12O 136.1,
found 136.0.
Compound 9: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 9 as a solid (7 mg, 0.038 mmol,
75%) 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): ∂ 7.44 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 7.6, 2H), 4.14 (s, 2H), 3.82
(s, 3H); GCMS (Rt = 9.93 min) calculated for C12H10O2 186.1, found 186.2.
Compound 10: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 10 as a solid (7 mg, 0.045 mmol,
1
90%). H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): ∂ 8.01 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t,
J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (s, 2H). GCMS (Rt = 8.77 min) calculated for C10H7NO
157.1, found 157.2.
Compound 11: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 11 as a solid (5 mg, 0.046 mmol,
92%). Using 7 as a starting material (3.5 mg, 0.032 mmol, 91%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): ∂ 5.21
(s, 2H), 4.35 (s, 2H), 3.39 (s, 2H); GCMS (Rt = 6.01 min) calculated for C6H7NO 109.1, found 109.1.
Compound 12: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 12 as a solid (5 mg, 0.045 mmol,
1
90%). H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): ∂ 4.36 (s, 4H); GCMS (Rt = 7.88 min) calculated for C6H6O2
110.0, found 110.1.
Compound 13: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 13 as a solid. (9 mg, 0.039 mmol,
1
78%). H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.53 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.30 (m,
J = 7.5, 5H), 4.74 (s, 2H); GCMS (Rt = 10.75 min) calculated for C17H12O2 232.1, found 232.1.
Compound 14: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 14 as a solid. (4 mg, 0.019 mmol,
38%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.52 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 4.73 (s, 2H),
2.32 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.56 (quintet, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (m, 2H), 0.95 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); GCMS
(Rt = 9.85 min) calculated for C15H16O 212.1, found 212.2.
Compound 15: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 15 as a solid. (10 mg, 0.038 mmol,
1
76%). H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.53 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d,
J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.65 (s, 2H), 3.96 (s, 3H); GCMS (Rt = 13.10 min)
calculated for C18H14O2 262.1, found 262.1.
Compound 16: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 16 as a solid. (10 mg, 0.043 mmol,
1
86%). H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.61 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d,

Molecules 2015, 20
5283
J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 4.65 (s, 2H); GCMS
(Rt = 10.75 min) calculated for C6H11NO 233.1, found 233.3.
Compound 17: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 17 as a solid. (8 mg, 0.043 mmol,
86%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.40 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.61 (s, 2H),
3.28 (s, 2H). GCMS (Rt = 9.92 min) calculated for C12H11NO 185.1, found 185.2.
Compound 18: The solvent was removed in vacuo to give compound 18 as a solid (8 mg, 0.043 mmol,
86%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): ∂ 7.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.72 (s, 2H),
4.35 (s, 2H); GCMS (Rt = 9.94 min) calculated for C12H10O2 186.1, found 186.1.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, the utilization of microwave irradiation has been found to increase the reaction rate
of solid-supported Glaser-Hay reactions, improving their utility in the preparation of large combinatorial
libraries via a more efficient synthesis. Moreover, the polarity of the diyne was found to be an important
factor in reaction rate, as more polar alkynes were obtained in higher yields relative to their microwave
transparent counterparts. Moreover, alkynes with basic, coordinating moieties were often found to
perform better in the microwave than under thermal conditions as reduced catalyst poisoning was
observed due to enhanced reaction rates. Overall, the microwave mediated, solid-supported Glaser-Hay
reaction represents an efficient synthetic methodology to chemoselectively obtain a range of
heterodimeric polyynes that can be employed in a variety of applications.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the College of William & Mary and the Jeffress Memorial
Trust for their financial support of the research.
Author Contributions
Douglas Young planned and supervised the project as well as aided in the composition of the
manuscript. Jessica Lampkowski, Johnathan Maza, and Sanjana Verma were involved in the
optimization of the reactions as well as in the synthesis of the compounds. All authors have read and
approved the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Vilhelmsen, M.; Jensen, J.; Tortzen, C.; Nielsen, M. The Glaser-Hay Reaction: Optimization and
Scope Based on C-13 NMR Kinetics Experiments. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 701–711.
2. Glaser, C. Beitrage zur Kenntiniss des Acetyenylbenzols. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1896, 2,
422–424.

Molecules 2015, 20
5284
3. Hay, A.S. Polymerization by oxidative coupling. II. Oxidation of 2, 6-disubstituted phenols.
J. Poly. Sci. 1962, 58, 581.
4. Hay, A.S. Oxidative Coupling of Acetylenes. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3320.
5. Wong, W. Recent advances in luminescent transition metal polyyne polymers. J. Inorg.
Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2005, 15, 197–219.
6. Shi Shun, A.L.K.; Tykwinski, R.R. Synthesis of naturally occurring polyynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 1034–1057.
7. Slepkov, A.D.; Hegmann, F.A.; Eisler, S.; Elliott, E.; Tykwinski, R.R. The surprising nonlinear
optical properties of conjugated polyyne oligomers. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 6807–6810.
8. Pan, Y.; Lowary, T.; Tykwinski, R.R. Naturally occurring and synthetic polyyne glycosides. Can. J.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 87,1565–1582.
9. Klebansky, A.; Dolgopolsky, I.; Dobler, Z. The Role of Complex Compounds and Cations of
Complex-Forming Components in the Polymerization of Acetylene. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR
1957, 114, 323–326.
10. Yin, W.; He, C.; Chen, M.; Zhang, H.; Lei, A. Nickel-Catalyzed Oxidative Coupling Reactions of
Two Different Terminal Alkynes Using O-2 as the Oxidant at Room Temperature: Facile Syntheses
of Unsymmetric 1,3-Diynes. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 709–712.
11. Montierth, J.; DeMario, D.; Kurth, M.; Schore, N. The polymer-supported Cadiot-Chodkiewicz
coupling of acetylenes to produce unsymmetrical diynes. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 11741–11748.
12. Chodkiewicz, W.; Cadiot, P.; Willemart, A. Diethynyl-Arenes. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Seances
Acad. Sci. 1957, 245, 2061–2062.
13. Zheng, Q.; Hua, R.; Wan, Y. An Alternative CuCl—Piperidine-Catalyzed Oxidative Homocoupling
of Terminal Alkynes Affording 1,3-Diynes in Air. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 24, 314–316.
14. Wang, L.; Yan, J.; Li, P.; Wang, M.; Su, C. The Effect of Amines on Oxidative Homo-Coupling
of Terminal Alkynes Promoted by Copper Salts. J. Chem. Res. 2005, 2, 112–115.
15. Li, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Q. A Mild Copper-Mediated Glaser-Type Coupling Reaction
Under the Novel CuI/NBS/DIPEA Promoting System. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4033–4036.
16. Lampkowski, J.S.; Durham, C.E.; Padilla, M.S.; Young, D.D. Preparation of Asymmetrical Polyynes
by a Solid-Supported Glaser-Hay Reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 13, 424–427.
17. Tripp, V.T.; Lampkowski, J.S.; Tyler, R.; Young, D.D. Development of Solid-Supported
Glaser-Hay Couplings. ACS Comb. Sci. 2014, 16, 164–167.
18. Herrero, M.A.; Kremsner, J.M.; Kappe, C.O. Nonthermal Microwave Effects Revisited:
On the Importance of Internal Temperature Monitoring and Agitation in Microwave Chemistry.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 36–47.
19. Hoz, A., Loupy, A., Eds. Microwaves in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
2012.
20. Senaiar, R.; Young, D.D.; Deiters, A. Pyridines via Solid-Supported [2 + 2 + 2] Cyclotrimerization.
Chem. Commun. 2006, 1313–1315, doi:10.1039/B515901F.
21. Young, D.D.; Deiters, A. A General Approach to Chemo- and Regioselective Cyclotrimerization
Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5187–5190.

Molecules 2015, 20
5285
22. Bédard, A.C.; Collins, S.K. Microwave Accelerated Glaser-Hay Macrocyclizations at High
Concentrations. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6420–6422.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 7–18 are available from the authors.
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).