ChemComm
Communication
was obtained under the same conditions.14 However, poor stereo- screened for this reaction and all the substrates gave the desired
selectivity as compared to N-pyranosides was observed, possibly due products with excellent yields and stereoselectivities. By varying
to the difference in conformation and reactivity of intermediates. the chirality of the C3 position of the glycal substrates, both a- and
Although the result is less than satisfactory, it may provide an access b-isomers can be obtained with high stereoselectivities.
to the formation of the N-furanosyl linkage and further investigation
is currently ongoing in our laboratory.
We gratefully acknowledge the support by Nanyang Technological
University (RG50/08) and support by an NMRC grant (H1N1 R/001/
To explain the selectivities of palladium catalysed glycosylation, 2009) from Ministry of Health, Singapore. We thank Yong-Xin Li and
the steric effect of the C3 substituent was always mentioned.15 Dr Ganguly Rakesh for X-ray analysis.
However, this hypothesis does not match the results from our
previous studies in a few cases.9,16 Recently, a double coordination
Notes and references
1 (a) L. A. Lasky, J. E. Groopman and C. W. Fennie, et al., Science, 1986,
effect was introduced which provided a more reasonable explana-
tion.17 Based on the above results, a double coordination effect
233, 209; (b) A. Kobata, Acc. Chem. Res., 1993, 26, 319; (c) R. A. Dwek,
mechanism is therefore proposed as follows (Scheme 4): the first
step involved the formation of the carbamate intermediate 3 from
the reaction of glycal 1 and CDI analogues. Without any catalyst, an
allylic cation II and an imidazole anion III were then generated in situ
through the decarboxylation of unstable intermediate I. Under
this set of conditions, the a-isomer was furnished as the major
product due to the anomeric effect, which made the heteroatomic
substituent III prefer axial orientation. Meanwhile, the lower energy
chair-form transition state of nucleophilic addition from the a-face
may further enhance a-selectivity. On the other hand, in the presence
of Pd(PPh3)4, double coordination of the palladium catalyst involving
the double bond of glycal and the lone pair of the nitrogen atom
resulted in the formation of key intermediate IV with the palladium
species on the b-face. Subsequently, intermediate V was generated
through a decarboxylative reaction promoted by the palladium
catalyst. Thereafter, nucleophilic addition gave compound 4 with
b-selectivity and the elimination of the palladium catalyst completed
the catalytic cycle. For asymmetric CDI analogues, since both of the
nitrogen can work as a nucleophile in the next step, two different
products can be obtained.
Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 683.
2 (a) E. Lukevics and A. Tablecka, Nucleoside Synthesis Organosilicon Methods,
E. Horwood, New York, 1991; (b) L. L. Rossi and A. Basu, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 3596; (c) B. L. Willkinson, H. Long, E. Sim and
A. J. Fairbanks, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, 18, 6265; (d) P. Norris, Curr.
Top. Med. Chem., 2008, 8, 101.
3 For selected methods, see: (a) R. R. Schmidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1986, 25, 212; (b) H. Kunz and W. Gnter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1990,
29, 1050; (c) V. Bolitt, B. Chaguir and D. Sinou, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992,
33, 2481; (d) C. Unverzagt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1996, 35, 2350;
(e) K. A. Savin, J. C. G. Woo and J. S. Danishefsky, J. Org. Chem., 1999,
74, 4183; ( f ) Y. Guindon, M. Gagnon, I. Thumin, D. Chapdelaine,
´
G. Jung and B. Gerin, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 241; (g) S. R. Guppi, M. Zhou
and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 293; (h) A. Schweifer and
F. Hammerschmidt, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 8159.
4 For selected examples by Tunge’s group, see: (a) R. R. P. Torregrosa,
Y. Ariyarathna, K. Chattopadhyay and J. A. Tunge, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2010, 132, 9280; (b) R. Jana, J. J. Partridge and J. A. Tunge, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5157; (c) J. D. Weaver, A. Recio,
A. J. Grenning and J. A. Tunge, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 1846.
5 For selected examples by Trost’s group, see: (a) B. M. Trost and J. Xu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17180; (b) B. M. Trost, J. Y. Xu and
T. Schmidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 18343; (c) B. M. Trost,
B. Schaffner, M. Osipov and D. A. A. Wilton, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2011, 50, 3548.
6 For selected examples by Stoltz’s group, see: (a) D. C. Behenna and
B. M. Stoltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 15044; (b) N. H. Sherden,
D. C. Behenna, S. C. Virgil and B. M. Stoltz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2009, 48, 6840; (c) D. C. Behenna, Y. Liu, T. Yurino, J. Kim,
D. E. White, S. C. Virgil and B. M. Stoltz, Nat. Chem., 2012, 4, 130.
7 Selected examples from other groups: (a) M. Nakamura, A. Hajra,
K. Endo and E. Nakamura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 7248;
(b) S.-L. You and L.-X. Dai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 5246;
(c) D. Imao, A. Itoi, A. Yamazaki, M. Shirakura, R. Ohtoshi, K. Ogata,
Y. Ohmori, T. Ohta and Y. Ito, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 1652;
(d) S. B. J. Kan, R. Matsubara, F. Berthiol and S. Kobayashi, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 6354; (e) W. H. Fields, A. K. Khan, M. Sabat and
J. J. Chruma, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 5131; ( f ) J. Wang, Z. Cui, Y. Zhang,
H. Li, L. Wu and Z. Liu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 663.
8 (a) Y. Bai, J. Zeng, S. Cai and X.-W. Liu, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4394;
(b) S. Xiang, S. Cai, J. Zeng and X.-W. Liu, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4608;
(c) Y. Bai, M. Leow, J. Zeng and X.-W. Liu, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 5648.
9 J. Zeng, J. Ma, S. Xiang, S. Cai and X.-W. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2013, 52, 5134.
In conclusion, we have developed a concise and highly efficient
strategy for the synthesis of N-glycosyl imidazole analogues. This
reaction was based on a palladium catalysed decarboxylative
allylation and three sequential steps of carbamation, decarboxyla-
tion and allylation were involved in this one-pot reaction. Different
kinds of protecting groups, glycals and various CDI analogues were
10 S. Xiang, Z. Lu, J. He, K. L. M. Hoang, J. Zeng and X.-W. Liu,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 14047.
11 For more details, see CCDC number 957218.
12 S. R. Mellegaard-Waetzig, D. K. Rayabarapu and J. A. Tunge, Synlett,
2005, 2759.
13 For the decarboxylative reaction of compound 5 derivative, only a
mixture of a : b = 1 : 1 C-glycoside was obtained in ref. 9.
14 The 5-TBDPS protected furanosyl glycal was prepared according to
Pedersen’s method. For more details, see ESI†.
15 H.-H. Li and X.-S. Ye, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 3855.
16 Y. Bai, K. L. M. Hoang, H. Liao and X.-W. Liu, J. Org. Chem., 2013,
78, 8821.
Scheme 4 Plausible reaction mechanism.
17 B. P. Schuff, G. J. Mercer and H. M. Nguyen, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 3173.
4224 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 4222--4224
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014