A. L. Barsamian et al.
PhH (5 × 10 mL) followed each time by concentration. To remove less
polar contaminants, the residue was triterated with Et2O (4 × 5 mL); this
time, the triturant being the discard and the residual powder the
retained material. Analysis of the resulting amorphous powder (115 mg,
the desired labelled β-EHSS (>94 wt.% in [13C]4-3, eff. 15 mg, 0.045 mmol,
83% yield) associated now with only a minor residual amount of [13C]4-1
(<6 wt.%). Data for [13C]4-3: IR (KBr) 2927, 1679, 1463, 1400, 1262, 1219,
1199, 1153, 1054, 898, 789, 729, 669, and 645 cmÀ1
;
1H NMR (700 MHz,
dry weight) by 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed it to be a 1:1 molar mixture d6-DMSO) δ 12.2 (1H, br s, OH), 3.93–3.83 (2H, m), 3.59 (1H, br d, JCH
=
1
of [13C]4-7 and [13C]4-sulfosuccinate (i.e. 61 wt% in [13C]4-7, 70 mg,
0.203 mmol, 41% yield from [13C]4-4) that was used without further
purification in the next step. NMR spectral data for [13C]4-7 (from a
139.0 Hz), 2.85 (1H, br d, JCH = 132.5 Hz), 2.72 (1H, br d, JCH = 131.0 Hz),
1.52–1.48 (1H, m), 1.37–1.20 (8H, m), 0.86 (3H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), and 0.83
(3H, tm, J = 7.2 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 172.7 (0, d,
1
1
mixture with [13C]4-sulfosuccinate): 1H NMR (700 MHz, CD3OD-D2O, 2:1) 1JCC = 55.1 Hz), 168.6 (0, d, JCC = 59.7 Hz), 66.0 (2, d, JCC = 7.2 Hz), 61.6
1
2
1
1
δ 7.32 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.95 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 5.08 (1H, d, J = 12.5 Hz), (1, dd, JCC = 59.9, 38.0 Hz), 38.1 (1), 34.1 (2, dd, JCC = 54.8, 38.0 Hz),
1
5.06 (1H, d, J = 13.2 Hz), 4.06 (1H, dm, JCH = 136.4 Hz), 3.82 (3H, s), and 29.5 (2), 28.3 (2), 22.9 (2), 22.4 (2), 13.9 (3), and 10.7 (3) ppm; MS (ES
3.35–2.88 (2H, m) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CD3OD-D2O, 2:1) δ 173.6 (0,
+) m/z 359 (M + Na)+; and HRMS (ES+) m/z 359.0926 (calcd. for
1
d, JCC = 58.3 Hz), 172.5–171.6 (0, m), 131.6 (2C, 1), 115.4 (2C, 1), 66.8 (2),
12C183C4H21Na2O7S: 359.0938).
1
64.4–63.3 (1, m), 56.5 (3), and 35.3 (2, dd, JCC = 58.5, 37.8 Hz) ppm.
Sodium [13C]4-1-(2-ethylhexyloxycarbonyl)-2-(4-methoxy-
Conclusion
benzyloxycarbonyl)-ethanesulfonate ([13C]4-8)
Regioselective syntheses of stable isotope-labelled α-EHSS
([13C]4-2) and β-EHSS ([13C]4-3) have been successfully realized.
The ultimate regiochemical outcome of each synthesis was
unequivocally established by the combined action of 13C/13C
and 1H/13C NMR spectral correlation experiments that were
facilitated by the high level of 13C-atom enrichment. The stable
isotope-labelled materials described herein will prove useful as
LC-MS/MS standards for the trace analysis of DOSS and its
A 100-mL RB flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with
the mixture of [13C]4-7 and [13C]4-sulfosuccinate obtained previously
(115 mg, 1:1 molar ratio, 0.203 mmol
(5, 86 μL, d = 0.833, 72 mg, 0.551 mmol), 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
(DMAP, 122 mg, 1.00 mmol), and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium chloride
(DMAP•HCl, 119 mg, 0.751 mmol). The flask was flushed with Ar gas
and, then, the contents dissolved in anhydrous dimethylformamide
(DMF) (6.0 mL) with stirring (30 min). DCC (185 mg, 0.898 mmol) in
[
13C]4-7), 2-ethylhexan-1-ol
anhydrous DMF (1.0 mL) was added dropwise, and the resulting mixture degradation products in laboratory microcosms and in Gulf
was allowed to stir for 96 h at rt. After this time, the mixture was diluted
with EtOAc (75 mL), filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo.
The residue was triturated with three portions of EtOAc (25 mL then
2 × 7 mL), and the combined triturant was concentrated in vacuo. The
residue (244 mg) was subjected to column chromatography (SiO2, eluting
with 0–5% MeOH in EtOAc) to afford a co-eluting mixture of [13C]4-8,
of Mexico field samples collected as a result of emergency
response efforts connected to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Acknowledgements
[
13C]4-DOSS (1), and DMAP. To remove the DMAP, the mixture was
The BP Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (GoMRI) funded
research consortium project ‘Ecosystem Impacts of Oil and Gas
Inputs to the Gulf (ECOGIG)’, led by the University of Mississippi,
is thanked for support of this work. This is ECOGIG manuscript
number 190. Research reported in this publication was
supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award
Number T32ES007060. The content is solely the responsibility of
the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views
of the National Institutes of Health. Mr. Rodger Kohnert (OSU) is
thanked for his assistance in obtaining the INADEQUATE NMR
spectrum for [13C]4-2, and Ms. Michelle Romero (OSU) is
gratefully acknowledged for obtaining mass spectra.
dissolved in EtOAc (35 mL), washed with aq. 1.0 M HCl (2 × 1.50 mL),
H2O (1 mL), and brine (3 × 1.0 mL), then dried (Na2SO4) and
concentrated in vacuo. This treatment afforded 94 mg of a pure two
component mixture of [13C]4-8 (36 wt.%, eff. 34 mg, 0.075 mmol, 37%)
and [13C]4-DOSS (1) as a colourless paste that was used directly in
the next transformation. Data for [13C]4-8 (from a mixture with [13C]4-1):
1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.24 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.83 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz),
1
5.02 (2H, s), 4.40 (1H, br d, JCH = 139.9 Hz), 4.12–3.90 (2H, m), 3.77 (3H,
1
s), 3.18 (2H, br d, JCH = 132.0 Hz), 1.53–1.45 (1H, m), 1.40–1.20 (8H, m),
and 0.90–0.82 (6H, m) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.8 (0, d, 1JCC
=
58.7 Hz), 170.0 (0, d, 1JCC = 58.9 Hz), 159.7 (0), 130.2 (2C, 1), 128.0 (0), 114.0
(2C, 1), 69.0 (2), 66.8 (2), 61.2 (1, dd, 1JCC = 59.1, 36.4 Hz), 55.4 (3), 38.5 (1),
1
33.2 (2, dd, JCC = 59.0, 36.7 Hz), 30.1 (2), 28.9 (2), 23.4 (2), 23.1 (2), 14.2
(3), and 10.9 (3) ppm; MS (ES+) m/z 479 (M + Na)+; and HRMS (ES+) m/z
Conflict of interest
479.1524 (calcd. for 12
13
C C4H29Na2O8S: 479.1513).
16
The authors did not report any conflict of interest.
Sodium [13C]4-2-carboxy-1-(2-ethylhexyloxycarbonyl)
ethanesulfonate ([13C]4-3)
References
A stirred solution of a portion of the two component mixture of [13C]4-8
and [13C]4-DOSS (1) obtained previously (68 mg, 36 wt.% in [13C]4-8, eff.
24.5 mg, 0.054 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) at 0°C was treated dropwise with
trifluoroacetic acid (0.10 mL) during 1 min. The resulting mixture was
allowed to warm to rt during 1 h and then concentrated in vacuo. The
residue was treated with Et2O (5 mL) and H2O (0.1 mL), shaken, and
concentrated. The resulting solids were triturated with excess pentane
(17 mL), the triturant was separated by filtration, and the filter cake was
washed with further pentane (3 mL). The combined pentane filtrate
and washings (containing [13C]4-3 and [13C]4-1 but now free of any minor
inorganic impurities) were concentrated in vacuo. To remove a majority
of [13C]4-1 from [13C]4-3, the residue was now triturated with Et2O
(3 × 5 mL); this time, the triturant being discarded and the residual
powder retained. Analysis of this final colourless amorphous solid
material (16 mg, dry weight) by 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed it to be
[1] B. Graham, W. K. Reilly, F. Beinecke, D. F. Boesch, T. D. Garcia,
C. A. Murray, F. Ulmer, Deep Water: The Gulf Oil Disaster and
the Future of Offshore Drilling, National Commission on the BP
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, 2011.
[2] United States Environmental Protection Agency website: EPA
response to BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico, questions and answers
[1 October 2013].
[3] a) T. V. K. Deepika, J. Oleo Sci. 2006, 55, 429–439; b) J. Hibbs,
Anionic Surfactants. In Chemistry and Technology of Surfactants
(Ed.: R. J. Farn), Blackwell: Oxford, 2006, 91–132.
[4] S. G. Hales, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1993, 12, 1821–1828.
[5] P. Campo, A. D. Venosa, M. T. Suidan, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47,
1960–1967.
[6] B. J. Place, M. J. Perkins, E. Sinclair, A. L. Barsamian, P. R. Blakemore,
J. A. Field, Deep Sea Res, 2014, in press.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Label Compd. Radiopharm 2014, 57 397–401