C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Preparation of synthetic lipoproteins. (a) Allylic taurine car-
bamates 9 and 10 serve as convenient water-soluble lipid precursors. (b)
ESI-MS analysis of farnesylated 4a. Conditions: 200 µM 4a, 1 mM 9,
400 µM Pd(OAc)2, 2 mM TPPTS, phosphate buffer, pH 9, 100 min, room
temperature. (c) To confirm the product structure, cresol adduct 11 was
prepared under analogous reaction conditions. (d) Modification of 4a using
10. Identical reactions conditions were used, with the addition of 5% DMSO.
Figure 3. Incorporation of synthetic lipoproteins into lipid bilayers. A
mixture of 4a, 4c (singly modified), and 4d (doubly modified) was incubated
with 100 nm small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) for 20 min in the presence
of 4 mM â-octyl-D-glucopyranoside. The unbound protein was removed
by passing the vesicles through Sephacryl S-1000 gel filtration resin. (b)
SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that only lipid-modified proteins were
associated with the vesicles.
reactions was verified by exposing this protein to Oregon Green
maleimide, a well-known reagent for the modification of cysteine
residues (lane 6*). In contrast, the protein coat of bacteriophage
MS2 (7, lane 7, demonstrated previously to possess reactive tyrosine
residues10) was successfully modified. Finally, the reaction also
proceeded to high levels of conversion when carried out on activated
R-chymotrypsin A (8). After disulfide reduction with DTT (which
cleaves the protein into three separate peptide chains), SDS-PAGE
analysis indicated that only the fragment at 10 kD (corresponding
to Y171) had been modified (lane 8).
effect highly selective transformations through the activation of
otherwise inert substrates. In addition to targeting an under-utilized
functional group, this reaction provides an important step forward
for the preparation of artificial lipoproteins. Current efforts are
focusing on the use of alternative phosphine ligands to direct
modifications to one of several tyrosine residues present on more
complex protein targets.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge the DOE Nano-
scale Science, Engineering, and Technology Program for generous
financial support, as well as the NIH (GM072700-01) and the
University of California, Berkeley, Chemistry Department. We
would also like to thank Jodi Gureasko and John Kuriyan for
samples of H-Ras, and John Antos, Bill Galush, Bryan Jackson,
and Jay Groves for helpful discussions.
A particularly attractive feature of this reaction is its ability to
cleave a “disposable” group upon formation of the π-allyl complex.
This can allow the aqueous solubilization of otherwise prohibitively
hydrophobic molecules by coupling them to charged carrier groups,
such as taurine (Figure 2a). To demonstrate this possibility, water-
soluble farnesyl carbamate 9 (1 mM) was exposed to 200 µM 4a,
2 mM TPPTS, and 400 µM Pd(OAc)2 in phosphate buffer at pH 9.
ESI-MS analysis indicated that 30% overall conversion to farne-
sylated product 4b was observed. Although Pd-catalyzed rearrange-
ments of the double bonds can be envisioned during this reaction,
linear allyl ether 11 was the only product observed upon exposure
of p-cresol to comparable reaction conditions.11
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental procedures
and characterization data for all intermediates. This material is available
References
Similar success was achieved for the alkylation of 4a using
exceptionally hydrophobic C17 chains. Taurine carbamate 10
displays good solubility in 95:5 H2O:DMSO mixtures and affords
singly and doubly modified protein conjugates (Figure 2d). The
sudden increase in doubly modified product may arise from the
association of singly modified protein with additional molecules
of carbamate 10 or through relaxation of the protein structure by
the small amount of organic cosolvent.
This “solubility switching” strategy provides convenient access
to proteins that can be incorporated into lipid membranes. To
explore this possibility, a mixture of 4a, 4c, and 4d (resulting from
the modification of 4a with 10) was exposed to 100 nm small
unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) for 20 min (Figure 3a). A nonionic
surfactant, â-octyl-D-glucopyranoside, was also added to the solution
to discourage the aggregation of the lipidated proteins. Following
this step, the unbound protein was removed from the sample by
passing the vesicles through Sephacryl S-1000 gel filtration media.
The protein content of the resulting samples was then determined
using SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 3b, none of the free protein
samples were able to pass through the resin in the absence of SUVs,
and vesicles exposed to unmodified 4a carried no protein with them
through the media. In contrast, SUVs were able to carry the lipid-
modified proteins through the gel filtration column, suggesting that
they had been embedded in the membrane bilayers. More detailed
studies examining the nature of this association are in progress.
Through these studies, a new tyrosine modification reaction has
been developed, capitalizing on the ability of transition metals to
(1) (a) Wang, Q.; Chan, T. R.; Hilgraf, R.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B.;
Finn, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3192-3193. (b) Deiters, A.;
Cropp, T. A.; Mukherji, M.; Chin, J. W.; Anderson, J. C.; Schultz, P. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11782-11783. (c) Link, A. J.; Tirrell, D.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11164-11165. (d) Antos, J. M.; Francis,
M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10256-10257. (e) McFarland, J.
M.; Francis, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13490-13491.
(2) (a) Dibowski, H.; Schmidtchen, F. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
476-478. (b) Bong, D. T.; Ghadiri, M. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2509-
2511. (c) Ojida, A.; Tsutsumi, H.; Kasagi, N.; Hamachi, I. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 3301-3305.
(3) See: Trost, B. M.; Lee, C. Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation Reactions. In
Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New
York, 2000.
(4) (a) Muzart, J.; Genet, J. P.; Dennis, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 326,
C23-C28. (b) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
815-816. (c) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
9074-9075.
(5) For additional examples of palladium π-allyl chemistry in aqueous media,
see: (a) Genet, J. P.; Blart, E.; Savignac, M. Synlett 1992, 715-717. (b)
Lemaire-Audoire, S.; Savignac, M.; Pourcelot, G.; Genet, J. P.; Bernard,
J. M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1997, 116, 247-258. (c) Genet, J. P.;
Savignac, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 305-317. (d) Danjo, H.;
Tanaka, D.; Hayashi, T.; Uozumi, Y. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14341-14352.
(e) Uozumi, Y.; Shibatomi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2919-2920.
(6) Joshi, N. S.; Whitaker, L. R.; Francis, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 15942-15943.
(7) See Supporting Information for sample quantitation details.
(8) Both phosphate and carbonate buffers (each at 100 mM) have been used
in the reaction with comparable results.
(9) For a similar elimination of a π-allyl complex, see: Takacs, J. M.; Lawson,
E. C.; Clement, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5956-5957.
(10) Hooker, J. M.; Kovacs, E. W.; Francis, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 3718-3719.
(11) Geranyl groups have also been transferred to phenols without olefin
rearrangement. See: Goux, C.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D. Synlett 1992,
725-727.
JA057106K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 4, 2006 1081