Catalytic Reduction and Cyclization of Haloalkynes
Reagents. Each of the following compounds was purchased from
commercial sources and was used without further purification:
1-bromopentane (97%), 1,4-dibromobutane (99%), 1,5-dibromopen-
tane (99%), 1-hexyne (97%), 1,4-diiodobutane (99+%), 1,5-diiodo-
pentane (97%), 1,3-dibromopropane (99%), 1,3-diiodopropane
(99%), 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN, 98%), tri-n-
butyltin hydride (97%), dodecane (99+%), 1.6 M n-butyllithium
in hexanes, 5-decyne (98%), and 4-nonyne (98%). Argon was used
to deaerate solutions for all electrochemical experiments. Dimethyl-
formamide (DMF, 99.9%) was used without further purification
as the solvent for cyclic voltammetry and controlled-potential
electrolysis; the concentration of residual water in the solvent is
typically 40 mM.27 Tetramethylammonium tetrafluoroborate
(TMABF4) was employed as the supporting electrolyte.
process to give species 6 and 7, respectively. However, for
purposes of the present study, the electroreductive intramolecular
cyclization of haloalkynes can be readily understood in terms
of 6 alone as the active catalyst. Accordingly, after the one-
electron reduction of 5 to 6 [reaction 1], the latter transfers an
electron to a haloalkyne, causing cleavage of the carbon-
halogen bond to give a halide ion and an alkyn-1-yl radical (8)
and to regenerate 5 [reaction 2]. As quickly as 8 appears, it can
undergo cyclization, coupling, hydrogen-atom abstraction from
the medium (SH), or disproportionation as depicted in reactions
3-6.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of Bromo- and Iodoalkynes. We prepared 1-bromo-
4-nonyne, 1-iodo-4-nonyne, 1-bromo-5-decyne, 1-iodo-5-decyne,
11-bromo-5-undecyne, and 11-iodo-5-undecyne by means of a
previously published general procedure1 that involves addition of
10 g of 1-hexyne in 80 mL of dry THF to 66 mL of 1.6 M
n-butyllithium in hexane, followed by injection of the appropriate
amount of an R,ω-dibromo- or R,ω-diiodoalkane into the solution.
After being refluxed overnight, the mixture was hydrolyzed by
addition of 2 mL of water. After drying with anhydrous sodium
sulfate, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the
residue was vacuum distilled to give the desired product.27
Synthesis of Pentylidenecycloalkanes. Pentylidenecyclopentane
was prepared according to a published procedure;1,5 equivalent
quantities of a 10% solution of tri-n-butyltin hydride in benzene
and a 0.07 M solution of 1-bromo-5-decyne in benzene (containing
1.8 mol % of AIBN as initiator) were mixed. Then the resulting
solution was refluxed for 36 h, after which the product was purified
by distillation: m/z (70 eV) 138, M+ (44); 95, [M - 43]+ (100);
67, [M - 71]+ (81).5
Pentylidenecyclobutane and pentylidenecyclohexane were identi-
fied as electrolysis products by a comparison of their gas chro-
matographic retention times and mass spectra with those of authentic
compounds synthesized according to a published procedure.28 For
pentylidenecyclobutane: m/z (70 eV) 124, M+ (58); 95, [M - 29]+
(76); 81, [M - 43]+ (98); 67, [M - 57]+ (100). For pentylidene-
cyclohexane: m/z 152, M+ (49); 109, [M - 43]+ (73); 81, [M -
71]+ (69); 67, [M - 85]+ (100).
Synthesis of Alkadiynes. We identified docosa-5,17-diyne as
an electrolysis product by comparison of its gas chromatographic
retention time and mass spectrum with those of an authentic sample.
This compound was prepared by overnight refluxing of 0.92 g of
sodium (0.04 mol) and 4.62 g (0.02 mol) of 11-bromo-5-undecyne
dissolved in anhydrous diethyl ether. Unreacted sodium was
destroyed by addition of methanol to the reaction mixture. Then
the ether phase was washed twice with water and dried over
anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After the ether was evaporated, the
residue was distilled to remove unreacted starting material and low-
boiling side products. Mass spectra yielded the following results:
m/z (70 eV) 302, M+ (trace); 273, [M - 29]+ (10); 259, [M -
43]+ (28); 245, [M - 57]+ (47); 147, [M - 155]+ (38); 95, [M -
207]+ (62); 81, [M - 221]+ (100); 67, [M - 235]+ (95); high-
resolution electron impact mass spectrometry (HRMS) exact mass
calculated for C22H38 (M+) 302.2974, found 302.2977.
We employed the same procedure to synthesize authentic samples
of icosa-5,15-diyne and octadeca-5,13-diyne. For icosa-5,15-
diyne: m/z (70 eV) 274, M+ (trace); 245, [M - 29]+ (8); 231, [M
- 43]+ (16); 217, [M - 57]+ (62); 175, [M - 99]+ (25); 147, [M
- 127]+ (42); 81, [M - 193]+ (100); 67, [M - 207]+ (100); high-
resolution chemical ionization mass spectrometry (HRMS) exact
mass calculated for C20H35 (M + 1)+ 275.2739, found 275.2733.
Instrumentation, Electrodes, Cells, and Procedures. Instru-
mentation used for controlled-potential electrolyses is described
elsewhere.19,20 For cyclic voltammetry, we utilized a scanning
potentiostat; experiments were performed and manipulated via a
companion computer program installed on a personal computer. A
circular, planar working electrode (area ) 0.077 cm2) was
constructed by press-fitting a 3-mm-diameter glassy carbon rod into
a Teflon shroud. Reticulated vitreous carbon disk working electrodes
(approximately 2.4 cm in diameter, 0.4 cm in thickness, and having
an approximate geometric area of 200 cm2) for controlled-potential
electrolyses were cut from material (RVC 2X1-100S) supplied by
Energy Research & Generation, Inc. (Oakland, CA); cleaning,
preparing, and handling of these electrodes are described in an
earlier publication.21 Descriptions of electrochemical cells for cyclic
voltammetry and controlled-potential electrolysis can be found
elsewhere.22,23 For each controlled-potential electrolysis, the solution
volume was approximately 40 mL, the initial concentration of
nickel(II) salen was 2.0 mM, and the concentration of haloalkyne
was 20.0 mM. All potentials reported in this study are with respect
to a reference electrode consisting of a cadmium-saturated mercury
amalgam in contact with DMF saturated with both cadmium
chloride and sodium chloride; this reference electrode has a potential
of -0.76 V versus an aqueous saturated calomel electrode (SCE)
at 25 °C.24,25
Separation, Identification, and Quantitation of Electrolysis
Products. Electrolysis products in DMF-0.10 TMABF4 were
partitioned between diethyl ether and water, and the ether phase
was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated by means
of rotary evaporation. Separation, identification, and quantitation
were performed by means of gas chromatography. Quantitation
methods have been described in a previous paper.26 Peak areas for
the various products were determined with respect to that of an
internal standard (n-dodecane) added to the solution at the beginning
of an electrolysis. Additionally, gas chromatography-mass spec-
trometry was used to confirm the identities of all products through
comparison of their retention times and mass spectra with those of
commercially available and chemically synthesized authentic
samples. High-resolution mass spectrometry employing either
chemical ionization or electron impact was performed to aid in the
identification of products.
(19) Pritts, W. A.; Peters, D. G. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1995, 380, 147-
160.
(20) Klein, L. J.; Alleman, K. S.; Peters, D. G.; Karty, J. A.; Reilly, J.
P. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 481, 24-33.
(21) Cleary, J. A.; Mubarak, M. S.; Vieira, K. L.; Anderson, M. R.; Peters,
D. G. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1986, 198, 107-124.
(22) Dahm, C. E.; Peters, D. G. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 3117-3123.
(23) Vieira, K. L.; Peters, D. G. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1985, 196, 93-
104.
(24) Marple, L. W. Anal. Chem. 1967, 39, 844-846.
(25) Manning, C. W.; Purdy, W. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 1970, 51, 124-
126.
(26) Pritts, W. A.; Vieira, K. L.; Peters, D. G. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65,
2145-2149.
(27) La Perriere, D. M.; Carroll, W. F., Jr.; Willett, B. C.; Torp, E. C.;
Peters, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7561-7568.
(28) Michaely, W. J., Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington,
1971.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2006 627