1954
J. Rojas et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1951–1954
4H), 7.88 (d, J=8.2Hz, 1H, 6 0-H). (13): H NMR (CDCl3) d
1
References and Notes
4.53 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.68 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.72(s, 3H, OCH ),
3
6.38 (d, J=2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d,
J=16.0 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.28–7.65 (m, 3H), 7.70 (d, J=15.6 Hz,
1H, b-H), 7.85 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H, 60-H). (14): 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d 3.59 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.75 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.91 (s,
3H, OCH3), 6.48 (d, J=2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H),
7.20 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.38–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.67 (d,
1. Laskin, D. L.; Pendino, K. J. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Tox-
icol. 1995, 35, 655.
2. Wright, C. D.; Mulsch, A.; Busse, R.; Osswald, H. Bio-
chem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989, 160, 813.
3. Marcinkiewicz, J.; Grabowska, A.; Chain, B. Eur. J.
Immunol. 1995, 25, 947.
J=15.9 Hz, 1H, b-H), 7.78 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H, 60-H). (15): H
1
4. Kaur, H.; Halliwell, B. FEBS Lett. 1994, 350, 9.
5. Knowles, R. G.; Moncada, S. Biochem. J. 1994, 298, 249.
6. MacMicking, J.; Xie, Q. W.; Nathan, C. Annu. Rev.
Immunol. 1997, 15, 323.
7. Xie, Q. W.; Nathan, C. J. Leucocyte Biol. 1994, 56, 576.
8. Alcaraz, M. J.; Guillen, I. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002, 8, 125.
9. Herencia, F.; Ferrandiz, M. L.; Ubeda, A.; Dominguez,
J. N.; Charris, J. E.; Lobo, G. M.; Alcaraz, M. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 1169.
10. Herencia, F.; Ferrandiz, M. L.; Ubeda, A.; Guillen, I.;
Dominguez, J. N.; Charris, J. E.; Lobo, G. M.; Alcaraz, M. J.
FEBS Lett. 1999, 453, 129.
11. Herencia, F.; Ferrandiz, M. L.; Ubeda, A.; Guillen, I.;
Dominguez, J. N.; Charris, J. E.; Lobo, G. M.; Alcaraz, M. J.
Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 43.
NMR (CDCl3) d 4.48 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.56 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.61
(s, 3H, OCH3), 6.85–7.90 (m, 6H), 8.02(d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H, b-
H). (16): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 4.61 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.86 (s, 3H,
OCH3), 4.92(s, 3H, OCH 3), 7.54–7.75 (m, 6H), 7.80 (d,
J=15.9 Hz, 1H, b-H), 7.92(d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H, 60-H). (17): H
1
NMR (CDCl3) d 3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.90 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.95
(s, 3H, OCH3), 7.62(d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.64–7.75 (m,
5H), 7.78 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H, b-H), 7.96 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H, 60-
H). In addition, all compounds had IR, LSIMS and elemental
analysis in complete agreement with the assigned structures.
15. The substituted methyl ketone (1 mmol) and the aldehyde
(1 mmol) were dissolved in a minimum amount of methanol
(normally 2–4 mL) and then a single NaOH pellet was added
(about 100 mg). The reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature until an off-white to bright yellow solid was
formed (within a few min to 24 h). The solid was collected by
filtration and washed with cold methanol. The product was
recrystallized from appropriate solvent(s) whenever necessary.
16. Cell culture: The mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7
was cultured in DMEM medium containing 2mM l-gluta-
mine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 10%
fetal bovine serum. Cells were resuspended at a concentration
of 2 ꢃ 106/mL and co-incubated with Escherichia coli LPS
(1 mg/mL) at 37 ꢁC for 20 h in the presence of test compounds
or vehicle. The nitrite concentration as a reflection of NO
release was assayed fluorometrically. The amount of nitrite
was obtained by extrapolation from a standard curve with
sodium nitrite as a standard. The mitochondrial-dependent
reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-
zolium bromide (MTT) to formazan was used to assess the
possible cytotoxic effects of compounds. iNOS activity in
intact cells: RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulated for 20 h with
LPS were washed and Hank’s buffer supplemented with
l-arginine (0.5 mM) was added for 2h incubation with test
compounds to determine their effects on iNOS activity.
Supernatants were collected for the measurement of nitrite
accumulation for the last 2h fluorometrically as above. Wes-
tern blot assay: Cellular lysates from cell line RAW 264.7 (106/
well) incubated for 18 h with LPS were obtained with lysis
buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholic acid, 20 mM NaCl,
and 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4). Following centrifugation (10,000ꢃ
g, 15 min), supernatant protein was determined and 25 mg
protein were loaded on 12% SDS–PAGE and transferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes for 90 min at 125 mA. Membranes
were blocked in PBS–Tween 20 containing 3% w/v unfatted
milk and incubated with anti-iNOS polyclonal antibody (1/
1000 dilution). Blots were washed and incubated with perox-
idase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1/20,000 dilution;
Dako; Glostrup, Denmark). The immunoreactive bands were
visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL;
Amersham Iberica, Spain). Statistical analysis: Statistical eva-
luation included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) fol-
lowed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons. p Values of
p<0.05 (*) or p<0.01 (**) were taken as significant. Results
are shown as meanꢂSEM for n experiments. Inhibitory con-
centration 50% (IC50) values were calculated from at least
four significant concentrations.
12. Li, R.; Kenyon, G. L.; Cohen, F. E.; Chen, X.; Gong, B.;
Dominguez, J. N.; Davidson, E.; Kurzban, G.; Miller, R. E.;
Rosenthal, P. J.; McKerrow, J. H. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 5031.
13. Spectral data for dimethoxychalcone derivatives: (1): 1H
NMR (CDCl3) d 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.46
(d, J=2.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 6.52 (dd, J=2.1 and 8.6 Hz, 1H, 5-H),
7.12(d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.32–7.51 (m, 5H), 7.70 (d,
J=16.1 Hz, 1H, b-H). (2): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.82(s, 3H,
OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.47 (d, J=2.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 6.58
(dd, J=1.9 and 8.5 Hz, 1H, 5-H), 7.14 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H, a-
H), 7.30–7.47 (m, 4H), 7.65 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H, b-H), 7.82(d,
J=8.7 Hz, 1H, 60-H). (3): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.80 (s, 3H,
OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.45 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 6.56
(dd, J=2.0 and 8.6 Hz, 1H, 5-H), 7.10 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H, a-
H), 7.32–7.52 (m, 4H), 7.68 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H, b-H), 7.80 (d,
J=8.6 Hz, 1H, 60-H). (4): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.88 (s, 3H,
OCH3), 3.90 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.99 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H, 5-
1
H),7.63–8.19 (m, 5H), 8.20 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H, b-H). (5): H
NMR (CDCl3) d 3.78 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.91
(d, J=9.0 Hz 1H), 7.00–7.42(m, 5H), 7.76 (d, J=8.5 Hz 1H),
7.93 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H, b-H). (6): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.86 (s,
3H, OCH3), 4.02(s, 3H, OCH ), 6.80–7.40 (m, 6H), 7.46 (d,
3
J=14.8 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.70 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H, b-H), 8.05 (d,
J=8.0 Hz, 1H, 60-H). In addition, all compounds had IR,
LSIMS and elemental analysis in complete agreement with the
assigned structures.
1
14. Spectral data for trimethoxychalcone derivatives: (7): H
NMR (CDCl3) d 3.99 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.04 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.11
(s, 3H, OCH3), 6.68–8.02(m, 8H). ( 8): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d
4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.09 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.14 (s, 3H, OCH3),
7.30 (d, J=14.8 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.38–7.47 (m, 4H), 7.88 (d,
J=15.9 Hz, 1H, b-H), 7.98 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H, 60-H). (9): H
1
NMR (CDCl3) d 4.67 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.78 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.84
(s, 3H, OCH3), 6.35–7.70 (m, 5H), 7.80 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H, b-
0
1
H), 7.98 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H, 6 -H). (10): H NMR (CDCl3) d
3.92(s, 3H, OCH ), 4.15 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.20 (s, 3H, OCH3),
3
6.89 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.28–7.85 (m, 6H). (11): 1H
NMR (CDCl3) d 4.65 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.78
(s, 3H, OCH3), 6.68–7.80 (m, 7H), 7.90 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H, b-
H). (12): 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 4.53 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.62(s, 3H,
OCH3), 4.65 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.32(d, J=2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (d,
J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H, a-H), 7.25–7.50 (m,