Table 1 Effect of varying polymerisation conditions on the yield and molecular weight (determined by GPC) of the polymer 20
Experiment
Concentration of 19/M
Polymerisation time/h
Amount of initiator (wt% of 19)
Yield (%)
Mn (×103)
1
2
3
4
0.06
0.04
0.1
24
48
48
48
1.6
1.6
1.6
2.4
22
62
62
62
6.7
5.6
6.2
3.7
0.1
Scheme 6
Scheme 7
Scheme
4
Reagents and conditions: i. TBDMSCl, 2,6-dimethyl-
of the alkyl chain brings the polymerisable moiety close to the
inositol unit, causing slow propagation. The polymerisation
and the molecular weight have yet to be optimised. Removal of
the PMB groups in polymer 20 was carried out in the presence
of TFA in 89% yield (Scheme 7).
pyridine, DMF, 25 ЊC, 24 h; ii. NaH, p-methoxybenzyl chloride, DMF,
25 ЊC, 12 h; iii. TBAF, THF, 25 ЊC, 1 h; iv. DMSO, oxalyl chloride,
THF, Et3N, Ϫ78 ЊC to 25 ЊC, 18 h; v. NaBH4, methanol–THF, 25 ЊC,
18 h; vi. NaH, DMF, p-methoxybenzyl chloride, 25 ЊC, 12 h.
In conclusion, we have successfully synthesised the poly-
(pentyl methacrylate) carrying a conformationally rigid scyllo-
inositol substituent as a possible metal-chelating ligand, which
will be investigated in future.
Acknowledgements
We thank EPSRC for financial support and provision of the
Swansea MS service, the Cambridge Overseas Trust, Robinson
College, and the CVCP (UUK) for scholarships (to T.-H. Kim).
References
‡ All new compounds exhibited satisfactory analytical data, which
included combustion microanalysis, IR, 1H and 13C NMR spectra, and
mass spectra. Experimental procedures for the preparation of com-
pounds 3, 5, 6 and 20 have been deposited as Electronic Supplementary
Information.
1 G. Wulff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 21.
2 T. Kaliyappan and P. Kannan, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2000, 25, 343.
3 S. J. Angyal, Tetrahedron, 1974, 30, 1695.
4 K. Hegetschweiler, M. Ghisletta, T. F. Fässler, R. Nesper,
H. W. Schmalle and G. Rihs, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 2032.
5 J. Tae, R. D. Rogers and L. A. Paquette, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 139;
L. A. Paquette and J. Tae, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 4974.
6 T.-H. Kim, P. Dokolas, N. Feeder, M. Giles, A. B. Holmes and
M. Walther, Chem. Commun., 2000, 2419.
7 T.-H. Kim, M. Giles and A. B. Holmes, Chem. Commun., 2000,
2421.
8 H. W. Lee and Y. Kishi, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 4402.
9 I. Kadota, M. Kawada, V. Gevorgyan and Y. Yamamoto, J. Org.
Chem., 1997, 62, 7439.
10 S. M. McElvain and J. W. Nelson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1942,
64, 1825.
11 D. C. Billington, R. Baker, J. J. Kulagowski, I. M. Mawer, J. P. Vacca,
S. J. deSolms and J. R. Huff, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1989,
1423.
12 E. J. Corey and J. W. Suggs, J. Org. Chem., 1973, 38, 3224.
13 R. Gigg and C. D. Warren, J. Chem. Soc. (C), 1968, 1903.
Scheme 5 Reagents: i. Rh()Cl(PPh3)3, DABCO, ethanol–toluene–
H2O; ii. Hg()O, Hg()Cl2, acetone–H2O; iii. methacryloyl chloride,
DMAP, pyridine.
Polymerisation of the scyllo-inositol monomer 19 was carried
out at 65 ЊC in toluene with AIBN as a radical initiator under
various conditions (Scheme 6 and Table 1).
Although the molecular weight of the polymer 20 depends
on the concentration of the monomer and the amount of
initiator, the polymerisation yield is only dependent on the
reaction time. This indicates that the polymer grows slowly,
requiring longer reaction time and was not consistent with our
original assumption that the alkyl spacer should circumvent the
slow propagation step of the polymerisable group due to the
bulky inositol scaffold. It is now thought that the entanglement
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 2524–2525
2525