10.1002/anie.201703492
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
electrophilic imine carbon centre of 20 to form intermediate 21
present in the reaction mixture (m/z 912). DFT calculations
performed on a simplified model,[13] suggest that thiol addition
destabilizes the complex by increasing the electronic density on
the B-atom bond, weakening the B-O bond of the aminophenol
(Scheme 6, see also section 6.2 SI). This process leads to the
opening of the 5-member ring and to the formation of
intermediate 22 in which Btz (m/z of 367) is more solvent
exposed and consequently more susceptible to hydrolysis. This
corresponds to the less stable intermediate along the path, 15
kcal/mol above the reagents. This mechanism is also supported
by the presence of compound 24 (m/z of 489), which probably
derives from an intramolecular addition of the amino group on to
the GSH amide and consequent release of a glycine residue.
Hydrolysis of 24 forms the imine 25 that is also clearly present in
the reaction mixture (m/z 258). The free energy balance
calculated for the entire process indicates a fairly exergonic
reaction with ΔG = –6 kcal/mol.
spectrometry and DFT calculations, was proposed a reaction
mechanism for the GSH induced hydrolysis of the B-complex
that involves the GSH thiol addition to the electrophilic imine
carbon. Considering the boronated core straightforward
modularity, stability in human plasma and stimulus
responsiveness, the availability of cytotoxic drugs that maybe
simply borylated (e.g. SN38), this platform evidences unique
properties to be used in the construction of multivalent
therapeutic conjugates and as a protective group for BAs that
blocks the undesired reactivity of this function.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT),
Portugal
(grants:
SFRH/BD/94779/2013,
PTDC/QEQ-
QOR/1434/2014,
UID/DTP/04138/2013,
SAICTPAC/0019/2015
(iMed.ULisboa), UID/QUI/00100/2013 (LFV). Patent rights granted to
Hovione SA PT109941.
Keywords: Boronic acids • Multivalent • Bortezomib • SMDC
[1]
a) D. Hanahan, R. A. Weinberg, Cell 2011, 144, 646-674; b) Nilay Sethi
and Yibin Kang, Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 735-748; c) M. A. Swartz,
N. Iida, E. W. Roberts, S. Sangaletti, M. H. Wong, F. E. Yull, L. M.
Coussens, Y. A. DeClerck, Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 2473–2480.
Selected examples of multifunctional constructs: a) E. A. Rossi, D. M.
Goldenberg, C.-H. Chang, Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 309−323; b)
C. H. Kim, J. Y. Axup, A. Dubrovska, S. A. Kazane, B. A. Hutchins, E. D.
Wold, V. V. Smider, P. G. Schultz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
9918−9921; c) H. Y. Liu, P. Zrazhevskiy, X. Gao, Bioconjugate Chem.
2014, 25, 1511−1516; d) P. J. McEnaney, K. J. Fitzgerald, A. X. Zhang,
E. F. Douglass, Jr., W. Shan, A. Balog, M. D. Kolesnikova, D. A.
Spiegel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8034−18043; e) L. N. Anderson,
P. K. Koech, A. E. Plymale, E. V. Landorf, A. Konopka, F. R. Collart, M.
S. Lipton, M. F. Romine, A. T. Wright, ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11,
345−354.
[2]
[3]
[4]
a) P. Akkapeddi, S.-A. Azizi, A. M. Freedy, P. M. S. D. Cal, P. M. P.
Gois, G. J. L. Bernardes, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 2954–2963; b) I. Vergote,
C. P. Leamon, Ther Adv Med Oncol., 2015, 7, 206-218.
a) R. V. J. Chari, M. L. Miller, W. C. Widdison, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2014, 53, 3796 – 3827; c) S. Puthenveetil, S. Musto, F. Loganzo, L. N.
Tumey, C. J. O´Donnell, E. Graziani, Bioconjugate Chem. 2016, 27,
1030-1039; d) M. R. Levengood, X. Zhang, J. H. Hunter, K. K.
Emmerton, J. B. Miyamoto, T. S. Lewis, P. D. Senter, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 733-737.
Scheme 6. ESI-MS analysis of the conjugation reaction between B-complex
20 and GSH.
[5]
[6]
Recent examples: a) T. Flagstad, M. T. Petersen, T. E. Nielsen, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8395–8397; b) F. M. F. Santos, J. N. Rosa, N.
R. Candeias, C. P. Carvalho, A. I. Matos, A. E. Ventura, H. F. Florindo,
L. C. Silva, U. Pischel, P. M. P. Gois, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1631–
1637.
In summary, here is presented for the first time a modular
platform to construct cancer cell targeting drug conjugates, using
BAs to promote the assembly of functional components featuring
a cytotoxic drug (Btz), Peg chains and azide handles. The
multivalent boronated core was assembled in a single step (up
to 25 % isolated yield) and the azide component was effectively
post-functionalized with folate targeting units via a SPAAC
reaction. This molecular architecture afforded conjugates with
high selectivity against folate positive MDA-MB-231 cancer cells
and IC50 in the nanomolar the range. The boronated core was
shown to be quite stable in human plasma (up to 60 h half-life),
though reversible in the presence of GSH. The intracellular
delivery of the cargo attached to the BA component was
confirmed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Based on mass
F. Montalbano, P. M. S. D. Cal, M. A. B. R. Carvalho, L. M. Gonçalves,
S. D. Lucas, R. C. Guedes, L. F. Veiros, R. Moreira, P. M. P. Gois, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 4465–4472.
[7]
[8]
N. Ballatori, S. M. Krance, S. Notenboom, S. Shi, Kim Tieu, C. L.
Hammond, Biol Chem. 2009, 390, 191–214.
a) S. J. Baker, C. Z. Ding, T. Akama, Y.-K. Zhang, V. Hernadez, Y. Xia,
Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 1275-1288; b) R. Smoum, A. Rubinstein, V.
M. Dembitsky, M. Srebnik, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4156–4220.
M. Srinivasarao, C. V. Galliford, P. S. Low, Nature Rev Drug Discovery,
2015, 14, 203–219.
[9]
[10] A. F. Trindade, R. F. M. Frade, E. M. S. Maçôas,C. Graça, C. A. B.
Rodrigues, J. M. G. Martinho, C. A. M. Afonso, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2014, 12, 3181–3190.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.