S. Marchesan et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 3615–3618
3617
A different analysis on toxicity should be performed, con-
sidering the different profiles between substituent position
and toxicity with respect to the anti-HIV properties. In
fact, considering both anti-HIV and cytotoxicity proper-
ties, the best compounds of this series were the trans-3 iso-
mer, which presents a CC50/EC50 ratio of 26, which was
higher than reference compound 2 (CC50/EC50 = 12).
molecular modeling studies, and to Dott. Fabio Hollan
(CSPA, University of Trieste) for his continuous sup-
port with mass spectrometry. This work was carried
out with partial support from the EU (Project No.
QLRT-2000-0291 and RTN network ÔWONDER-
FULLÕ), MIUR (cofin prot. 2004035502), and the Uni-
versity of Trieste.
Preliminary computational studies were performed on
compounds 2 and 3 utilizing MOE. The dipolar mo-
ments were 8.8 D for 2 and 3.2 for 3. The relative hydro-
phobic surface, expressed as (hydrophobic surface/total
surface) · 100, has also been calculated and in the case
of 2 it is 76%, while for 3 it is 92%, demonstrating a sig-
nificant reduction in the amphiphilic character of the
N,N-dimethylfulleropyrrolidine trans-2 with respect to
2. Therefore, differences in toxicity between the two con-
sidered compounds could be attributed to differences in
amphipathicity, a reason these compounds could be
considered useful probes for biological studies. These re-
sults are in agreement with our recent study on toxicity
and on the hemolytic effect of C60 derivatives, from
which the toxic effect also seems to be related to the
amphiphilic character of the molecules.19
References and notes
1. Boutorine, A. S.; Tokuyama, H.; Takasugi, M.; Isobe, H.;
´ `
Nakamura, E.; Helene, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1994, 33, 2462.
2. Da Ros, T.; Vazquez, E.; Spalluto, G.; Moro, S.;
´
Boutorine, A.; Prato, M. J. Supramol. Chem. 2002, 327.
3. Dugan, L. L.; Gabrielsen, J. K.; Yu, S. P.; Lin, T. S.; Choi,
D. W. Neurobiol. Dis. 1996, 3, 129.
4. Dugan, L. L.; Turetsky, D. M.; Du, C.; Lobner, D.;
Wheeler, M.; Almli, C. R.; Shen, C. K.-F.; Luh, T.-Y.;
Choi, D. W.; Lin, T.-S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997,
94, 9434.
5. Bisaglia, M.; Natalini, B.; Pellicciari, R.; Straface, E.;
Malorni, W.; Monti, D.; Franceschi, C.; Schettini, G. J.
Neurochem. 2000, 74, 1179.
6. Monti, D.; Moretti, L.; Salvioli, S.; Straface, E.; Malori,
W.; Pellicciari, R.; Schettini, G.; Bisaglia, M.; Pincelli, C.;
Fuselli, C.; Bonafe, M.; Franceschi, C. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 2000, 277, 711.
7. Sijbesma, R.; Srdanov, G.; Wudl, F.; Castoro, J. A.;
Wilkins, C.; Friedman, S. H.; DeCamp, D. L.; Kenyon, G.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6510.
8. Friedman, S. H.; DeCamp, D. L.; Sijbesma, R.; Srdanov,
G.; Wudl, F.; Kenyon, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
6506.
None of the compounds were active against a variety of
DNA and RNA viruses in cell culture, including herpes
simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, vaccinia virus, and
vesicularstomatitisvirus(VSV)inHELcell cultures; para-
influenza-3, reovirus-1, Sindbis, Coxsackie B4, and Punta
Toro virus in Vero cell cultures; VSV, Coxsackie B4, and
respiratory syncytial virus in HeLa cell cultures; and
Moloney murine sarcoma virus in C3H/3T3 cell cultures.
The assays were performed as previously described.27
9. Ruoff, R. S.; Tse, D. S.; Malhotra, R.; Lorents, D. C. J.
Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 3379.
10. Brettreich, M.; Hirsch, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
2731.
11. Bosi, S.; Feruglio, L.; Milic, D.; Prato, M. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 4741.
3. Conclusions
This study confirms and increases further our knowledge
about the structure–activity relationship of C60 deriva-
tives as anti-HIV agents. In particular, patterns of substi-
tutions have been found for having improved action
against HIV-1 and HIV-2 strains, and a significant in-
crease in the CC50/EC50 ratio was also obtained, leading
to a better selectivity of antiviral inhibition. In fact, deriv-
ative 3 presents an EC50 of 0.21 lM for HIV-1 (as 1) and
also an interesting inhibition of HIV-2 (EC50 0.2–
1.0 lM).
12. Toniolo, C.; Bianco, A.; Maggini, M.; Scorrano, G.;
Prato, M.; Marastoni, M.; Tomatis, R.; Spisani, S.; Palu,
G.; Blair, E. D. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4558.
13. Nakamura, E.; Tokuyama, H.; Yamago, S.; Shiraki, T.;
Sugiura, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 2143.
14. Schuster, D. I.; Wilson, S. R.; Schinazi, R. F. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 1253.
15. Friedman, S. H.; Ganapathi, P. S.; Rubin, Y.; Kenyon, G.
L. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2424.
16. Marcorin, G. L.; Da Ros, T.; Castellano, S.; Stefancich, G.;
Bonin, I.; Miertus, S.; Prato, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3955.
17. Schuster, D. I.; Wilson, L. J.; Kirschner, A. N.; Schinazi,
R. F.; Schlueter-Wirtz, S.; Tharnish, P.; Barnett, T.;
Ermolieff, J.; Tang, J.; Brettreich, M.; Hirsch, A. In
Fullerene 2000—Functionalized Fullerenes; Martin, N.,
Maggini, M., Guldi, D. M., Eds.; The Electrochemical
Society: Pennington, NJ, USA, 2000; 9, p 267.
18. Bosi, S.; Da Ros, T.; Spalluto, G.; Balzarini, J.; Prato, M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 4437.
19. Bosi, S.; Feruglio, L.; Da Ros, T.; Spalluto, G.; Grego-
retti, B.; Terdoslavich, M.; Decorti, G.; Passamonti, S.;
Moro, S.; Prato, M. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6711.
20. Cusan, C.; Da Ros, T.; Spalluto, G.; Foley, S.; Janot, J.-
M.; Seta, P.; Larroque, C.; Tomasini, M.; Antonelli, T.;
Ferraro, L.; Prato, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 17, 2928.
21. Mashino, T.; Okuda, K.; Hirota, T.; Hirobe, M.; Nagano,
T.; Mochizuki, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2959.
Recently, Mashino et al. reported HIV reverse transcrip-
tase (HIV-RT) inhibition by 3, 4, and 5 in the micromo-
lar range,28 but we cannot attribute the action of 3–7
versus the HIV infection to a specific mechanism,
HIV-P and/or HIV-RT mediated. Further studies are
in progress in our laboratories to understand better
the mechanism of action, to increase antiviral potency
and, most importantly, to improve the CC50/EC50 ratio.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Mrs. Ann Absillis for her technical
assistance, to Dr. Paolo Braiuca for his help in the