Highly regioselective indoline synthesis under nickel/photoredox dual catalysis

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b05597

Nickel/photoredox catalysis is used to synthesize indolines in one step from iodoacetanilides and alkenes. Very high regioselectivity for 3-substituted indoline products is obtained for both aliphatic and styrenyl olefins. Mechanistic investigations indic

Full text of DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b05597

Communication
pubs.acs.org/JACS
Highly Regioselective Indoline Synthesis under Nickel/Photoredox
Dual Catalysis
Sarah Z. Tasker and Timothy F. Jamison*
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
S
* Supporting Information
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Indolines and Indoles via an
Intermolecular Alkene or Alkyne Annulation Strategy
ABSTRACT: Nickel/photoredox catalysis is used to
synthesize indolines in one step from iodoacetanilides
and alkenes. Very high regioselectivity for 3-substituted
indoline products is obtained for both aliphatic and
styrenyl olefins. Mechanistic investigations indicate that
oxidation to Ni(III) is necessary to perform the difficult
C−N bond-forming reductive elimination, producing a
Ni(I) complex, which in turn is reduced to Ni(0). This
process serves to further demonstrate the utility of
photoredox catalysts as controlled single electron transfer
agents in multioxidation state nickel catalysis.
mong the many advantages of using nickel in the
1
Adevelopment of new synthetic methods is the availability
of various oxidation states for catalysis, including Ni(0/I/II/III)
and even a recently reported well-defined Ni(IV) species.2
Nickel-catalyzed methods have generally fallen into either those
proposed to proceed via a Ni(0/II) pathway (e.g., aryl cross-
coupling,3 reductive coupling4) or those proposed to proceed via
a Ni(I/III) pathway (e.g., Csp3 cross-coupling5). However,
controlled access to additional oxidation states in a single
catalytic cycle can lead to novel and interesting chemistry
(Scheme 1). For example, Weix and co-workers recently
reported a cross-electrophile coupling with a concurrent polar
Ni(0/II) oxidative addition of an aryl halide and radical Ni(III/I/
II) oxidative addition/reductive elimination of an alkyl electro-
phile.6 The simultaneous recent reports from the research groups
of Molander7 and MacMillan and Doyle8 also describe aryl−alkyl
cross-coupling by using visible light photoredox catalysis9 to
generate alkyl carbon radicals, which can be trapped by Ni(II)
intermediates.10 Then, after reductive elimination, the sub-
sequent Ni(I) species is reduced by the same photoredox catalyst
to Ni(0) to complete the catalytic cycle. This field continues to
grow rapidly, giving access to novel reaction manifolds.11 Herein,
we report a nickel-catalyzed synthesis of indolines, likely enabled
by a mechanistically distinct direct oxidation and reduction of
nickel intermediates.
Our development of nickel-catalyzed Mizoroki−Heck reac-
tions of aliphatic olefins12 prompted us to consider whether an
appropriately positioned nitrogen-based functional group could
intercept the Ni−alkyl migratory insertion intermediate and
participate in a direct Csp3−N reductive elimination, thus
providing indoline products (Scheme 2a). Such reductive
eliminations are known to be accelerated by oxidation to Ni(III)
in stoichiometric reactions,13 so we reasoned that this reaction
might be appropriate for multioxidation state nickel catalysis.
This approach would also be analogous to the Larock indole
synthesis (Scheme 2a).14
Scheme 1. Recent Examples of Catalytic Reactions Involving
Four Different Oxidation States of Nickel
However, in contrast to indoles, where convergent annulation
strategies are common, most methods to synthesize indolines, a
common motif in natural products and pharmaceutically active
compounds, involve multiple steps.15 Generally, either the
Csp3−N bond or the Csp2−Csp3 bond is formed first, followed
Received: June 3, 2015
© XXXX American Chemical Society
A
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05597
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
unbiased nature of aliphatic terminal alkenes. Although similar
results had been seen in nickel-catalyzed Heck reactions
previously, only sterically demanding phosphine ligands had
been used successfully.12 After this initial result, we attempted
optimization of various reaction parameters,21 but quickly
discovered that catalytic turnover from Ni(II) was likely not
feasible since formation of indoline products was only observed
upon exposure of the reaction mixture to air during workup.
Csp3−N bond reductive elimination from low-valent Group 10
metals is known in rare cases,18,22 and Hillhouse and co-worker
had previously demonstrated that it could occur stoichiometri-
cally after extended reaction times at room temperature when β-
H elimination was not possible.13a However, consistent with our
results, they demonstrated that reductive elimination was made
far more facile by oxidation to Ni(III) by a number of
stoichiometric oxidants, including oxygen.
If oxidation to Ni(III) is necessary for reductive elimination,
single electron reduction of the Ni(I) species formed therein
would also be necessary to transition from a stoichiometric to a
catalytic manifold, a scenario, in theory, fulfilled by a photoredox
catalytic cycle. Spurred by the recent reports of Molander7 and
Doyle and MacMillan,8 we were excited to find that the addition
of the visible light photoredox catalyst Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 under
conditions similar to those reported by Molander (acetone, 2,6-
lutidine) produced significantly more indoline product than the
same reaction without photoredox catalyst (Table 1, entries 4
and 5). Further optimization using triethylamine furnished, for
the first time, yields in excess of the catalyst loading (entry 6).
Use of aryl iodides rather than bromides and blue LEDs to
shorten reaction times provided the optimal conditions for
excellent yields of indoline product (entry 8). Again, we were
gratified to see that under these conditions, indoline products
were produced in high selectivities (>19:1) over Heck products.
With these optimized conditions in hand, we explored the
scope of this transformation (Scheme 3). Substitution at the 4- or
5-positions of the 2-iodoacetanilide electrophile was well-
tolerated with both electron donating (e.g., 6b) and electron
withdrawing (e.g., 6c) substituents. However, substitution at the
3- or 6- positions of the arene resulted in substantially lower
Table 1. Reaction Optimization
a
X; R
ligand
base
yield 6
0%
1
OTf; Piv (1)
phosphine, PyBOX, various
phenanthroline-
type
organic/
inorganic
2
3
1
IPr
LiOt-Bu
7%
b
Cl (2), OTf (3), IPr
Br (4), I (5);
Ac
LiOt-Bu
10−14%
c
4
5
6
7
8
9
Br; Ac (4)
IPr
2,6-lutidine
2,6-lutidine
5%
cd
,
4
IPr, Ru(bpy)3
15%
33%
90%
88%
cd
,
4
IPr, Ru(bpy)3, 66 h Et3N
IPr, Ru(bpy)3, 48 h Et3N
IPr, Ru(bpy)3, 26 h Et3N
IPr, Ru(bpy)3, 26 h Et3N
cd
,
I; Ac (5)
ce
,
5
5
cf
,
g
9%
a
Yield 6 determined by GC using dodecane as an internal standard,
selectivity 6 to sum of Heck (7), isomerized Heck (e.g., 9), and 2-alkyl
b
c
indoline (8) > 19:1 unless otherwise noted. ≥10:1. Acetone (0.22
d
M). Compact fluorescent light (CFL), Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (2 mol %).
e
f
Blue LEDs, Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (1 mol %). Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (1 mol %)
g
reaction run in absence of light. 9:1.
by a cyclization to form the five-membered ring. Perhaps
surprisingly, given the ubiquity of the Larock indole synthesis, a
general indoline synthesis of 2-haloaniline derivatives with
alkenes has not been reported, although a few alkene annulation
methods have been developed (Scheme 2b). This approach
presents two main challenges: C−N bond reductive elimination
must outcompete β-hydride elimination (forming Heck-type
products), and Csp3−N reductive elimination is inherently
challenging.16 These two issues were first addressed by Larock
and co-workers, who reported indoline formation using 1,3-
dienes, which cannot undergo β-H elimination.17 C−N bond
formation also presumably proceeds via external nucleophilic
attack on a π-allyl intermediate. Other intermolecular annulation
approaches involve the use of alkenes without available β-H
atoms, first reported by Catellani and co-worker,18 or forego use
of alkenes altogether.19 Perhaps the most general approach thus
far was disclosed by Glorius and co-workers earlier this year.20
They reported using an internal diazinecarboxylate oxidant and
Rh(III)-catalyzed directed C−H functionalization to couple
arenes with chiefly electron-poor alkenes, yielding 2-substituted
aminoindolines. The 1-amino group can then be removed in a
subsequent step to reveal the NH-indoline.
a
Scheme 3. Scope of Aryl Electrophile
We began our development of a complementary and general
approach to indoline synthesis by testing conditions similar to
those of Heck reactions (Table 1, entry 1) and found that for a
variety of electrophiles, aniline protecting groups, bases, and
phosphine and N-type ligands, only Heck products were
observed. Finally, upon using the N-heterocyclic carbene
(NHC) ligand IPr, we were able to detect a small amount of
indoline product (entry 2). We were gratified to see that the
indoline product was produced in high selectivity (>19:1)
compared to the sum of all other products. This suggests that not
only was β-H elimination suppressed but also that alkene
migratory insertion had been highly selective for arene insertion
at the internal position, a difficult step given the electronically
a
All yields are isolated yields. Selectivity 6 to sum of 7−9 > 19:1 unless
otherwise noted. Reaction conditions: Ni(cod)2 (15 mol %), IPr (16
mol %), Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (1 mol %), Et3N (2 equiv), acetone (0.22
M), blue LEDs, rt, 26 h. Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (2 mol %), CFL, 35 °C, 48
b
c
d
h. 7:1. GC yield.
B
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05597
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
a
yields (6f and 6g). In several cases, reaction yields were improved
by slightly elevated temperatures (35 °C) and longer reaction
times, although generally greater amounts of products
corresponding to β-H elimination were observed at higher
temperatures.
Scheme 5. Mechanistic Studies
The substrate scope of alkene coupling partners is significantly
broader (Scheme 4). A variety of functional groups are well
tolerated in the indoline formation, including trimethylsilyl
groups (6i), protected alcohols and amines (6j, 6n), ketones
(6m), and alkyl chlorides (6o). Styrene was also a competent
coupling partner and gave the same 3-substituted indoline
product 6p as aliphatic alkenes despite the overwhelming
preference for arene insertion to the terminal position of such
alkenes. For styrenyl substrates, increased amounts of Heck
products were observed, but 2-substituted indoline products
1
a
were not observed by H NMR analysis. Styrenes substituted
GC yield using dodecane as an internal standard.
with electron donating and electron withdrawing groups were
also competent reaction partners (6q, 6r). Only terminal
monosubstituted alkenes were reactive under these conditions;
internal and 1,1-disubstituted alkenes gave no desired product.
GC analysis. When no oxidant was added, very little indoline was
observed, and a number of other products were formed in trace
amounts. However, when stirred open to air or PhI(OAc)2 was
added, significant amounts of product 6a (75 and 60%,
respectively) were observed with good selectivity for the desired
indoline product. The addition of catalytic Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2
surprisingly did not produce significant amounts of 6a, possibly
because of the larger than normal excess of Ni species compared
to photoredox catalyst leading to unselective or unproductive
oxidation/reduction and/or to photoredox catalyst death. Given
that stoichiometric oxidants do successfully increase the amount
of C−N bond formation as expected, a necessary oxidation to
Ni(III) prior to product formation is still likely.
a
Scheme 4. Scope of Alkene Coupling Partner
Scheme 6. Proposed Mechanism
a
All yields are isolated yields. Selectivity 6 to sum of 7−9 > 19:1 unless
otherwise noted. Reaction conditions: Ni(cod)2 (15 mol %), IPr (16
mol %), Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (1 mol %), Et3N (2 equiv), acetone (0.22
M), blue LEDs, rt, 26 h. Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (2 mol %), CFL, 35 °C, 48
h. 5:1. 12:1. 9:1. 8:1. 11:1.
b
c
d
e
f
g
We next set out to probe the mechanism of this reaction. The
intermediacy of a discrete Heck reaction followed by hydro-
amination was ruled out by reacting 5d with 1-octene in the
presence of independently synthesized Heck product 7a
(Scheme 5a).23 No formation of product 6a arising from 7a
was observed, suggesting that it is not a competent intermediate.
Next, we sought to investigate whether oxidation to Ni(III) was
indeed responsible for product formation (Scheme 5b). 2-
Iodoacetanilide (5a) was submitted to stoichiometric reaction
conditions without photoredox catalyst for 12 h. This mixture
was then split into portions and exposed to various oxidants,
before filtration through alumina under inert atmosphere and
We provisionally propose the catalytic cycle shown in Scheme
6, and several lines of evidence support the steps depicted.
Crystal structures of oxidative addition and migratory insertion
complexes were obtained,24 and the formation of complexes 10
and 12 were studied by H NMR. The feasibility of the
proposed redox steps were further examined by performing
cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies on Ni(0) complex 10 and
Ni(II) complex 12. The Ni(0/I) oxidation of 10 was irreversible,
so an exact E1/2 value could not be calculated.25 The potential
21
1
C
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05597
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
wave of the Ni(I/0) transition of 10 peaks at −1.12 V vs Fc/Fc+
(or ∼−0.74 V vs SCE)26 suggesting that it should be easily
2013, 135, 12004. (b) Schley, N. D.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014,
136, 16588.
9
+
II/I
(6) (a) Everson, D. A.; Shrestha, R.; Weix, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 920. (b) Biswas, S.; Weix, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16192.
(7) Tellis, J. C.; Primer, D. N.; Molander, G. A. Science 2014, 345, 433.
(8) Zuo, Z.; Ahneman, D. T.; Chu, L.; Terrett, J. A.; Doyle, A. G.;
MacMillan, D. W. C. Science 2014, 345, 437.
reduced by Ru(bpy)3 [E1/2 = −1.33 V vs SCE in MeCN].
The Ni(II/III) oxidation of 12 is reversible, and E1/2III/II = −0.20
V vs Fc/Fc+ (or ∼+0.18 V vs SCE), suggesting that it should also
be easily oxidized by *Ru(bpy)32+ [E1/2II/I = +0.77 V vs SCE in
MeCN].9 The selectivity for desired reaction formation in the
presence of so many redox-active species rather than off-cycle
redox events is impressive.27 Also, for the first time, the
photoredox cycle appears to oxidize and reduce nickel directly,
rather than generating free carbon-based radicals that are then
trapped by nickel. Several mechanistic puzzles still remain,
however, including why both iodide and N-acetyl protecting
group are necessary for good reaction yields21 and the exact role
of triethylamine, so further mechanistic studies are needed to
further elucidate the mechanism of this complex transformation.
In summary, the first general annulation reaction of 2-
iodoaniline derivatives and terminal alkenes to form indolines
has been developed. Using a nickel/NHC catalytic system, high
selectivities for insertion to the terminal position of both aliphatic
and styrenyl alkenes is achieved. Moreover, Csp3−N bond
formation is achieved by leveraging the various oxidation states
available to nickel within the same reaction system using
photoredox catalysis as a powerful tool. We envision that using
similar dual catalytic systems will enable other reactions for
which reductive elimination would otherwise be particularly
challenging.
(9) Prier, C. K.; Rankic, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Chem. Rev. 2013,
113, 5322.
(10) Recent studies have also suggested trapping of a radical by Ni(0),
rather than Ni(II): Gutierrez, O.; Tellis, J. C.; Primer, D. N.; Molander,
G. A.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4896.
(11) (a) Noble, A.; McCarver, S. J.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2015, 137, 624. (b) Primer, D. N.; Karakaya, I.; Tellis, J. C.;
Molander, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2195. (c) Xuan, J.; Zeng,
T.-T.; Chen, J.-R.; Lu, L.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 4962.
(12) (a) Tasker, S. Z.; Gutierrez, A. C.; Jamison, T. F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1858. (b) Matsubara, R.; Gutierrez, A. C.; Jamison, T.
F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19020.
(13) (a) Koo, K.; Hillhouse, G. L. Organometallics 1995, 14, 4421.
(b) Lin, B. L.; Clough, C. R.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 2890.
(14) Larock, R. C.; Yum, E. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6689.
(15) Liu, D.; Zhao, G.; Xiang, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2010, 3975.
(16) Hartwig, J. F. Nature 2008, 455, 314.
(17) Larock, R. C.; Berrios-Pena, N.; Narayanan, K. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
̃
55, 3447.
(18) Catellani, M.; Del Rio, A. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1998, 47, 928.
(19) (a) Thansandote, P.; Raemy, M.; Rudolph, A.; Lautens, M. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 5255. (b) Gilmore, C. D.; Allan, K. M.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1558.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05597.
(20) Zhao, D.; Vas
2015, 54, 1657.
́ ́
quez-Cespedes, S.; Glorius, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
■
S
(21) See Supporting Information for more details.
(22) Ni: (a) Miura, T.; Morimoto, M.; Yamauchi, M.; Murakami, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5359. Pd: (b) Marquard, S. L.; Rosenfeld, D. C.;
Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 793. (c) Hanley, P. S.;
Marquard, S. L.; Cundari, T. R.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,
134, 15281.
Experimental procedures and spectral data for all
unknown compounds (PDF)
X-ray data (CIF)
(23) Qin, L.; Ren, X.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 5915.
X-ray data CIF)
(24) CCDC 1403188 and 1403189 contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of
charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.
ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
(25) Pletcher, D.; Greef, R.; Peat, R.; Peter, L. M.; Robinson, J.
Instrumental Methods in Electrochemistry; Horwood: Chichester, U.K.,
2001.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*tfj@mit.edu
Notes
■
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(26) Pavlishchuk, V. V.; Addison, A. W. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 298,
97.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
(27) The need for Et3N or i-Pr2EtN for good yields is curious since the
large excess of these amines relative to Ni should result in their oxidation
Support for this work was provided by the NIGMS (GM63755)
and NSF (Graduate Research Fellowship to S.Z.T.). We are
grateful to Megan Jackson for help in obtaining cyclic
2+
by *Ru(bpy)3 as well. Whether amine oxidation modulates the
oxidizing strength of the photoredox catalyst acting as a SET relay for Ni
oxidation, acts to build up the reducing Ru(bpy)3 , or is irrelevant (with
Et3N acting solely as a base) is unclear.
+
voltammograms, Dr. Peter Muller for X-ray crystallography, Li
Li for HRMS data, and Dr. Eric Standley, Dr. Kim Jensen, and Dr.
Matthew Katcher for helpful discussions.
̈
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Tasker, S. Z.; Standley, E. A.; Jamison, T. F. Nature 2014, 509,
299. (b) Ananikov, V. P. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1964.
(2) Camasso, N. M.; Sanford, M. S. Science 2015, 347, 1218.
(3) Yamaguchi, J.; Muto, K.; Itami, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 19.
(4) (a) Montgomery, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3890.
(b) Standley, E. A.; Tasker, S. Z.; Jensen, K. L.; Jamison, T. F. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2015, 48, 1503.
(5) The radical nature of oxidative addition of an alkyl halide often
involves the brief intermediacy of a Ni(II) species as well:
(a) Breitenfeld, J.; Ruiz, J.; Wodrich, M. D.; Hu, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
D
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05597
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX