5228 Organometallics, Vol. 15, No. 24, 1996
Cianfriglia et al.
M-Pd-I complexes, the metal-iodo moiety has cer-
tainly been activated, but other critical key steps need
to be realized in order to complete the catalytic cycle.19
However, convincing evidence that the process we are
studying plays a role in the formation of a metal-carbon
bond promoted by palladium arises from the smooth
reaction occurring between the oxidative addition in-
termediates 16 and 17 and the acetylenic stannane 18,
to form the products of transmetalation, 19 and 20 (eq
5). In reference to the mechanism of the Pd-catalyzed
carbon-carbon bond formation, although the oxidative
addition step is the trigger of the whole catalytic cycle,7
transmetalation is almost invariably the rate-limiting
step, and generally, when the oxidative addition-
transmetalation-reductive elimination sequence fails,
it is this step which warrants attention.1,7,20 In 19 and
20, the metal center M and the acetylide, i.e., the two
partners to be coupled, although joined by the interposi-
tion of palladium, constitute already a single molecular
unit, and the completion of the coupling process through
the trans to cis isomerization and the reductive elimina-
tion steps is expected to be an overall downhill energetic
pathway. In this respect, the behavior of 20 is note-
worthy. During the recording of its 31P NMR spectrum,
it showed a behavior similar to the reversible formation
of the trigonal complex 21 (eq 6), which may be the
precursor to the cis isomer. In the carbon-carbon
coupling reaction, the formation of a similar trigonal
complex has been already invoked as intermediate
during the trans to cis isomerization preceding reductive
elimination.7b,21
aspects of the carbon-carbon coupling itself, for which
important reinterpretations have been proposed.5,7 More-
over, it is also worthy of note that, while the Mo-Pd
bond is quite a common feature, complexes such as 4,
17, and 20 add to the very few existing examples
showing a direct W-Pd bond.14 In our opinion, the
successful isolation of complexes 19 and 20 represents,
indeed, the disclosure of a new scenario in the endless
world of surprises of palladium chemistry.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Rea gen ts a n d Meth od s. Elemental analyses were per-
formed by the Servizio Microanalisi of the Area della Ricerca
di Roma (C.N.R., Montelibretti, Italy).
Solvents, including those used for chromatograpy, and
liquids were thoroughly degassed before use. Flash chroma-
tography was performed with 230-400 mesh silica gel (Merck).
All reactions were carried out under an atmosphere of
prepurified argon using conventional vacuum line and Schlenk
tube techniques22 in oven-dried glassware, or in a nitrogen-
filled Braun glovebox. Liquids were transferred by syringe
or cannula techniques. THF and Et2O were distilled from
sodium-potassium alloy. DMF was distilled from CaH2 under
reduced pressure. Preparation of the 1,3-diphenyl-2,4-cyclo-
pentadiene required modification of the literature report.23 The
crude ethyl 3-benzoylpropionate precursor had to be formed
using an excess of ethyl alcohol and then dissolved in Et2O
and washed to neutrality with an ice-cold solution of NaHCO3
to remove the remaining alcohol and the H2SO4 used to
catalyze its formation. Without these precautions, formation
of the ester was incomplete, and extensive decomposition took
place during distillation. Moreover, the subsequent cyclization
step must be performed by using the minimum amount of
benzene solvent so as to obtain a 1 M solution of EtONa. Bis-
(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium [Pd(dba)2],24 (CH3CN)3Mo-
(CO)3,25 (CH3CN)3W(CO)3,25 Pd[P(C6H5)3]4,26 (CH3)3SnCtCC6-
Preliminary evidence that these complexes further
evolve toward the completion of the catalytic cycle has
already been obtained.12
29
H5,27 HCtC(C6H4)p-NO2,28 and Bu3SnNEt2 were prepared
according to published procedures.
Con clu sion
TlOCH2CH3 (Aldrich), ClP(C6H5)2 (Strem), and ICH2CH2I
(Aldrich) were used as received. The active organometallic
content of the organolithium reagents was checked periodically
by titration with 2,5-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol.30
In conclusion, with the isolation of the oxidative
addition and transmetalation intermediates 16,17, and
19,20, we showed impressive analogies between the Pd-
catalyzed carbon-carbon and metal-carbon bond for-
mation mechanisms, and these results suggest that this
second pathway could disclose the feasibility of a similar
efficient and useful chemistry as that of the former
process. Moreover, the model we engineered in the
present study, by allowing a large degree of systematic
variations, seems particularly suitable to carry out
systematic and quantitative investigations of the pro-
cesses under examination. One can study the depen-
dence of the various steps of these transformations from
steric and electronic factors, by varying the type of
ancillary ligands, both on the metal M and the Pd, and
the number and type of the substituents on the Cp as
well as on the coordinating side arm. The easy isolation
of the oxidative addition intermediate should also allow
its use for systematic screening of the transmetalation
process, taking advantage of the easy availability of a
large variety of organotin partners.6 These studies,
besides clarifying the factors influencing the metal-
carbon formation phenomenon, by reversing the paral-
lelism, might also shed light on many still unclear
(
5-2,4-P h 2C5H3)Tl (7). This compound was prepared by
adopting the method developed by Mathey and Lampin13 for
a similar compound. A 500 mL Schlenk flask was loaded with
17.85 g (81.78 mmol) of 6 and 400 mL of ethyl ether. To this
was added 20.4 g (81.78 mmol) of thallium ethoxide by a
syringe, causing the formation of a yellow precipitate. After
1 h of stirring, the suspension was filtered and the solid
washed with ethyl ether (3 × 20 mL) and then dried under
vacuum to afford 33.44 g (97%) of product.
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 5.39 (d, 2H, J ) 2.2 Hz), 5.89 (t,
1H, J ) 2.2 Hz), 6.17 (t, 2H, J ) 7.7 Hz), 6.41 (t, 4H, J ) 7.7
Hz), 6.59 (d, 4H, J ) 7.7 Hz). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 71.08,
75.21, 90.90, 91.67, 92.99, 96.49, 107.56. IR (Nujol, KBr): 1595
(m), 1519 (m), 897 (w), 794 (w), 756 (m), 691 (m) cm-1. Anal.
Calcd for C17H13Tl: C, 48.42; H, 3.10. Found: C, 48.50; H,
3.15.
(22) Shriver, D. F., Dredzon, M. A. The Manipulation of Air-Sensitive
Compounds, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986.
(23) (a) Kugel, M. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1898, 299, 50. (b) Drake, N.
L.; Adams, J . R., J r. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 1326.
(24) Ukay, T.; Kawazawa, H.; Ishii, Y.; Bonnett, J . J .; Ibers, J . A. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1974, 65, 253.
(25) Tate, D. P.; Knipple, W. R.; Augl, J . M. Inorg. Chem. 1962, 1,
433.
(26) Coulson, D. R. Inorg. Synth. 1972, 13, 121.
(27) Lorberth, J . J . Organomet. Chem. 1969, 16, 327.
(28) Takahashi, S.; Kuroyama, Y.; Sonogashira, K.; Hagihara, N.
Synthesis 1980, 627.
(19) Grushin, V. V.; Alper, H. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1047.
(20) Negishi, E.; Takahashi, T.; Baba, S.; Van Horn, D. E.; Okukado,
N. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2393.
(21) (a) Stang, P. J .; Kowalski, M. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
3356. (b) Portnoy, M.; Milstein, D. Organometallics 1993, 12, 1655.
(29) J ones, K.; Lappert, M. F. J . Chem. Soc. 1965, 1944.
(30) Winkle, M. R.; Lansinger, J . M.; Ronald, R. C. J . Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1980, 87.