Umm-E-Farwa et al.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 40 (2021) 127979
Table 2
Yields (%) and biological activities of synthesized dibenzazepine-linked isoxazoles (33–54).
Compd. #
R
Yield
(%)
α
-Glucosidase inhibition
Lipase inhibition
Carbonic anhydrase inhibition
IC50 ± SDa
Ki ± SDa
Mode of inhibition
IC50 ± SDa
IC50 ± SDa
(µM)
(µM)
(µM)
(µM)
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
–
H
60
58
59
50
49
52
70
65
59
63
72
65
70
79
64
56
50
42
54
52
46
62
–
77.90 ± 1.14
154.86 ± 2.07
114.23 ± 0.81
160.62 ± 1.24
106.82 ± 0.43
98.62 ± 0.94
231.16 ± 1.62
64.86 ± 1.03
71.17 ± 1.34
333.30 ± 1.67
142.23 ± 2.03
Inactive
85.84 ± 0.01
Non-competitive
259.61 ± 0.79
169.23 ± 0.81
178.26 ± 1.09
162.85 ± 2.31
408.23 ± 1.59
415.04 ± 2.46
281.42 ± 2.14
inactive
121.10 ± 1.71
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
inactive
–
2′′-F
–
–
3′′-F
–
–
4′′-F
–
–
2′′-Cl
–
–
3′′-Cl
–
–
4′′-Cl
–
–
2′′-Br
55.57 ± 0.01
Non-competitive
3′′-Br
76.35 ± 0.01
Non-competitive
142.85 ± 2.03
inactive
2′′-Me
–
–
3′′-Me
–
–
inactive
4′′-Me
–
–
inactive
4′′-OEt
3′′-OBn
4′′-OBn
3′′-CN
214.79 ± 3.21
35.62 ± 1.48
165.71 ± 0.74
52.16 ± 1.56
46.62 ± 0.79
85.42 ± 0.38
189.51 ± 0.73
Inactive
–
–
287.84 ± 3.06
inactive
31.14 ± 0.01
Mixed
–
–
398.78 ± 1.73
289.90 ± 0.94
301.62 ± 1.34
139.12 ± 0.81
283.85 ± 1.43
274.37 ± 1.53
269.34 ± 1.45
181.89 ± 1.43
–
59.37 ± 0.00
Non-competitive
4′′-CN
54.76 ± 0.01
Non-competitive
2′′-NO2
3′′-NO2
4′′-NO2
3′′-OEt-4′′-Cl
3′′-Cl-4′′-NMe2
Acarboseb
Orlistatc
Acetazolamided
94.04 ± 0.01
Non-competitive
–
–
–
–
Inactive
–
–
109.75 ± 1.74
875.75 ± 2.08
–
115.37 ± 0.01
Non-competitive
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
0.01 ± 0.13
–
–
–
–
–
0.12 ± 0.00
a SD = Standard Deviation; b Standard drug for
α
-glucosidase inhibition; c Standard drug for lipase inhibition; d Standard drug for carbonic anhydrase inhibition;
Synthesized compounds 33–54 were found to be inactive in cytotoxicity assay as well as anti-glycation and DPPH inhibitory activity.
respectively, was found to be more active, and showed 19-fold better
than the reference drug. Comparatively, -glucosidase inhibitory activ-
interactions (see Supplementary Material, Fig. 9). Compound 40 with Br
α
at 2′′-position showed similar interactions to compound 33 (see Sup-
plementary Material, Fig. 10), and showed H-bonds with Lys156,
Ser157, Ser311, Asp242, and Gln353. Arg315 interacted with Br-
ity of nitro-substituted compounds was decreased, as this group was
switched from 2′′- (compound 50) to 3′′-position (compound 51). While,
compound 52 with nitro group at 4′′-position was found to be inactive.
Further, kinetic studies of dibenzazepine-linked isoxazoles 33, 40,
41, 46, 48, 49, 50 and 54 were done to investigate their mode of inhi-
bition (see Supplementary Material, Figs. 1–8). For this, various kinetic
parameters, such as, Vmax (enzyme’s maximum velocity) and Km ([S]
when enzyme’s velocity is half of the maximum) were examined using
different kinetic plots (Lineweaver-Burk plot, its secondary replots, and
Dixon plots). Lineweaver-Burk plot can be defined as the reciprocal of
reaction rate against reciprocal of substrate concentration [S]), while it´s
secondary replot is the plot of slope vs inhibitor concentration [I]. Dixon
plot was defined as a reciprocal of enzyme’s maximum velocity (Vmax) vs
inhibitor concentration [I].
substituted phenyl ring via π-cationic interactions, while Tyr158 inter-
acted via π-π stacking interactions. Change in position of Br group form
2′′- to 3′′-position in compound 41 resulted in a different docked pose
(see Supplementary Material, Fig. 11). Compound was able to retain the
H-bonds with Lys156, Ser157, Asp242, Asp352, and Ser311, while
π
-cationic, and π-π stacking interactions were lost. This was in accor-
dance with the kinetics results that showed a better Ki value for com-
pound 40 (Ki = 55.57 ± 0.01 µM), in comparison to compound 41 (Ki =
76.35 ± 0.01 µM).
Compound 46 with benzyloxy group showed a completely different
docked pose and resulted in H-bonding interactions with Ser157,
Asp242, Pro312, Gln353, and Glu411 (see Supplementary Material, Fig
.12). Compound 48 (3′′-substituted CN group) showed Ser240, Asp242,
Isoxazole 46 showed a mixed-type of inhibition (see Supplementary
Material, Fig. 1) with Ki = 31.14 ± 0.01 µM (Table 2). In this mode, Vmax
decreased, nevertheless, Km value either decreased or increased. How-
ever, isoxazoles 33 (Ki = 85.84 ± 0.01 µM), 40 (Ki = 55.57 ± 0.01 µM),
41 (Ki = 76.35 ± 0.01 µM), 48 (Ki = 59.37 ± 0.00 µM), 49 (Ki = 54.76 ±
0.01 µM), 50 (Ki = 94.04 ± 0.01 µM), and 54 (Ki = 115.37 ± 0.01 µM)
showed a non-competitive type of inhibition (see Supplementary Ma-
terial, Figs. 2–8). In this mode, Vmax was decreased whereas, apparent
Asp352, Gln353, and π-π stacking interactions (blue dotted line) with
Phe303 (see Supplementary Material, Fig. 13). Compound 49 (4′′-
substituted CN group) showed H-bonding interactions with Lys156,
Ser157, Asp242, Ser311, and Glu411 and π-π stacking interactions (blue
dotted line) with Tyr158 (see Supplementary Material, Fig. 14).
Compound 50 with NO2 group at 2′′-position showed H-bonds (red-
dotted line) with Ser157, Asp352. Arg315 interacted via π-cation and
K
m was not affected.
salt bridge formation (see Supplementary Material, Fig. 15). Compound
54 with Cl group at 3′′- and dimethylamino group at 4′′-position showed
H-bonding interactions with Pro312, Asn350, Gln353, and Glu411 (see
Supplementary Material, Fig. 16).
Compounds 33, 40, 41, 46, 48–50, and 54 with significant in vitro
α
-glucosidase inhibitory activity, were then preceded for ligand-
receptor interaction studies via molecular docking studies. All the
compounds showed binding interactions with critical amino acid resi-
Synthesized dibenzazepine-linked isoxazoles (33–54) were also
screened for other biological activities (Table 2), such as antiglycation
using rutin (IC50 = 55.80 ± 0.00 µM), DPPH inhibitory activity using N-
acetyl-L-cysteine (IC50 = 96.90 ± 0.66 µM) and gallic acid (IC50 = 21.80
± 1.03 µM) as reference compounds, respectively. But all compounds
were found to be inactive. Results for carbonic anhydrase inhibitory
activity of isoxazoles (33–54) using acetazolamide (IC50 = 0.12 ± 0.00
µM), showed unsubstituted derivative 33 as only and weakly active
dues of α-glucosidase enzyme. All the compounds (except compound 46)
were found to be non-competitive inhibitors via kinetic studies. There-
fore, sitemap analysis was performed to identify the best allosteric site in
α
-glucosidase enzyme.
Unsubstituted congener 33 (IC50 = 77.90 ± 1.14 µM; Ki = 85.84 ±
0.01 µM) showed H-bonding interactions with Lys156, Ser157, Asp352,
Ser311 and Glu411, while it interacted with Tyr158 via π-π stacking
4