1812 Organometallics, Vol. 16, No. 8, 1997
Notes
Ta ble 2. Selected Bon d Len gth s (Å) a n d An gles
[Ar N(CH2)3NAr ]Ti[CH2B(C6F 5)2](C6F 5) (3a ). B-
(C6F5)3 (76 mg, 0.15 mmol) in pentane (5 mL) was added
dropwise at 23 °C to [ArN(CH2)3NAr]TiMe2 (1a ; 70 mg,
0.15 mmol) dissolved in pentane (5 mL) to give a yellow-
orange precipitate. After ∼2 h the solution turned
homogeneous. Stirring was continued for 16 h. The
clear solution was passed through a plug of Celite,
concentrated to ∼2 mL, and cooled to -30 °C. 3a (120
mg, 0.12 mmol, 83%) was obtained as an orange crystal-
line solid. 1H NMR: δ 7.12 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.01 (m, 3H,
Ar), 4.58 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.92 (br s, 2H, TiCH2), 3.31
(sept, 2H, CHMe2), 3.28 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 3.20 (m, 2H,
NCH2), 1.42 (m, 1H, NCH2CH2), 2.29 (m, 1H, NCH2CH2),
1.30 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.04 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.95 (d, 6H,
CHMe2), 0.78 (d, 6H, CHMe2). 13C{1H} NMR: δ 145.4,
144.0, 141.4, 129.4, 125.0, 109.5 (TiCH2), 65.0, 33.4,
29.5, 28.2, 27.0, 26.2, 22.6, 22.4 (the carbon resonances
for the perfluorophenyl groups appear as multiplets
from 150-135 ppm). 19F{1H} NMR: δ -119.4 (d, 2F,
Fo), -132.3 (d, 4F, Fo), -154.0 (t, 2F, Fp), -155.1 (t, 1F,
Fp), -163.2 (m, 2F, Fm), -164.2 (m, 4F, Fm). 11B{1H}
NMR: δ 79.4. Anal. Calcd for C33H53ClN2Ti: C, 57.16;
H, 4.38; N, 2.90. Found: C, 57.49; H, 4.81; N, 2.69.
X-r a y Cr ysta llogr a p h ic An a lysis of 3a ‚CH2Cl2.
Crystallographic data appear in Table 1. The final unit
cell parameters were obtained by least squares on the
setting angles for 25 reflections with 2θ ) 31.5-45.6°.
The intensities of three standard reflections, measured
every 200 reflections, decayed linearly by 1.8%. The
data were processed24 and corrected for Lorentz and
polarization effects, decay, and absorption (empirical,
based on azimuthal scans). The structure was solved
by direct methods. The dichloromethane molecule was
severely disordered. The 6 largest peaks in the solvent
region were refined as chlorine and the next 4 peaks as
carbon. The occupancy factors and isotropic thermal
parameters were refined for all 10 solvent peaks. All
other non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic
thermal parameters. Hydrogen atoms (excluding those
associated with the solvent) were fixed in idealized
(d eg) for 3a ‚CH2Cl2
Bond Distances
Ti(1)-N(1)
Ti(1)-C(28)
C(34)-B(1)
C(41)-B(1)
1.846(4)
2.191(4)
1.503(6)
1.584(7)
Ti(1)-N(2)
Ti(1)-C(34)
C(35)-B(1)
B(1)-F(1)a
1.849(3)
2.111(4)
1.567(7)
2.94
Bond Angles
N(1)-Ti(1)-N(2)
N(1)-Ti(1)-C(34)
N(2)-Ti(1)-C(34)
Ti(1)-N(1)-C(1)
C(1)-N(1)-C(4)
Ti(1)-N(2)-C(16)
100.8(2) N(1)-Ti(1)-C(28)
102.8(2)
104.8(2)
113.5(2) N(2)-Ti(1)-C(28)
111.2(2) C(28)-Ti(1)-C(34) 121.5(2)
119.1(3) Ti(1)-N(1)-C(4)
116.3(4) Ti(1)-N(2)-C(3)
122.7(3) C(3)-N(2)-C(16)
124.5(3)
122.8(3)
114.6(3)
Ti(1)-C(28)-C(29) 120.9(3) Ti(1)-C(28)-C(33) 127.7(4)
Ti(1)-C(34)-B(1)
C(34)-B(1)-C(41)
125.1(3) C(34)-B(1)-C(35)
122.0(5) C(35)-B(1)-C(41)
120.9(5)
117.1(4)
a
Close contact.
methylaluminoxane) systems concomitant with meth-
ane evolution has been observed.22 Perhaps the forma-
tion of complex 3a can be viewed as a model for this
process.
Con clu sion
A living R-olefin polymerization system is generated
from the titanium dimethyl complexes 1a,b and B(C6F5)3
(2a ,b). In the absence of monomer, compound 2b is
stable; however, the bulkier complex 2a deactivates to
give the methylene derivative 3a . In principle, migra-
tion of the pentafluorophenyl group back to boron could
generate a single-component catalyst. The titanium is
clearly more electrophilic than boron in this instance,
precluding formation of this species. We are currently
exploring the interaction of other group 13 Lewis acids,
for example AlClMe2, in the hope of generating chelating
diamide analogues of Tebbe’s reagent [Cp2Ti](µ-CH2)-
(µ-Cl)[AlMe2].23
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Deta ils. All experiments were performed
under an atmosphere of dry dinitrogen using standard
Schlenk techniques or in an Innovative Technology Inc.
glovebox. Pentane was treated with 5% HNO3 in H2-
SO4 to remove any olefins prior to being distilled under
argon from sodium/benzophenone ketyl. The com-
pounds [ArN(CH2)3NAr]TiMe2 (1a ; Ar ) 2,6-iPr2C6H3)
and [Ar′N(CH2)3NAr′]TiMe2 (1b; Ar′ ) 2,6-Me2C6H3)14
positions (C-H ) 0.98 Å, BH ) 1.2Bbonded atom).
A
secondary extinction correction (Zachariasen type, iso-
tropic) was applied, the final value of the extinction
coefficient being [2.6(3)] × 10-7. Neutral atom scatter-
ing factors and anomalous dispersion corrections for all
atoms were taken from ref 25. Selected bond lengths
and angles for 3a appear in Table 2.
15
and B(C6F5)3 were prepared according to literature
Ack n ow led gm en t . Funding from the NSERC
(Canada) in the form of a Research Grant to D.H.M. and
Union Carbide Canada is gratefully acknowledged.
procedures. [ArN(CH2)3NAr]Ti(13CH3)2 (13C2-1a ) was
prepared from 2 equiv of 13CH3MgI and [ArN(CH2)3NAr]-
TiCl2 in ether.14 Proton (300 MHz), carbon (75.5 MHz),
boron (96.2 MHz), and fluorine (282.2 MHz) NMR
spectra were recorded in d8-toluene at approximately
23 °C on a Varian XL-300 spectrometer. The proton
chemical shifts were referenced to internal C6D5CD2H
(δ 2.09 ppm) and the carbon resonances to Cipso-C6D5-
CD3 (δ 137.5 ppm). Fluorine and boron chemical shifts
were referenced externally to CFCl3 (δ 0.0 ppm) and
BF3‚Et2O (δ 0.0 ppm), respectively. Elemental analyses
were performed by Guelph Chemical Laboratories Ltd.,
Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Text giving experi-
mental details and tables giving final atomic coordinates and
equivalent isotropic thermal parameters, all bond lengths and
angles, hydrogen atom parameters, and anisotropic thermal
parameters for 3a (20 pages). Ordering information is given
on any current masthead page.
OM961034B
(24) teXsan: Crystal Structure Analysis Package; Molecular Struc-
ture Corp.: The Woodlands, TX, 1995.
(25) (a) International Tables for X-Ray Crystallography; Kynoch
Press: Birmingham, U.K. (present distributor Kluwer Academic:
Boston, MA), 1974; Vol. IV, pp 99-102. (b) International Tables for
Crystallography; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 1992; Vol. C, pp 200-
206.
(22) Kaminsky, W. In Education in Advanced Chemistry; Marciniec,
B., Ed.; Poznan: Wroclaw, Poland, 1996; Vol. 2.
(23) Tebbe, F. N.; Parshall, G. W.; Reddy, G. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 3611.