Table 1 MALDI-TOF MS Data for dendrimer building blocks
Conjugate
MW (theory)
MW (exptl.)
Error
5d
6d
7d
5130.5
5383.8
10277.0
5126.3
5380.3
10271.1
0.08%
0.07%
0.06%
To demonstrate the self-assembly ability of the obtained
conjugates, the three compounds were combined in equimolar
ratios in aqueous 50 mM NaCl solution. The solutions were
allowed to anneal at room temperature for 12 h, and the
resulting structures were analyzed by non-denaturing poly-
acrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2). The single strand
conjugate 7d is shown in lane 2. Upon hybridization with either
5d or 6d, the mobility of the duplex band is reduced (lanes 3 and
4, respectively). Complexation of 7d with both 16-mers
produces a trimer of 32 base pairs, as can be seen in lane 5. The
migration of the trimer is slower than expected for an
unmodified 32-mer due to the presence of the three dendrons on
the duplex. The distinct major band in this sample indicates
hybridization of the conjugates to give the desired dendrimer
target in high yield.
Fig. 2 Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of self-assembled
dendrimers. Lane 1: Double stranded DNA ladder (20, 30, 40 bp). Lane 2:
7d. Lane 3: 5d + 7d. Lane 4: 6d + 7d. Lane 5: 5d + 6d + 7d.
Oligonucleotides were visualized using GelStar stain (BioWhittaker).
The self-assembly of dendronized oligonucleotides stream-
lines the synthetic demands required to incorporate multiple
functional groups on the periphery of a single molecular target.
Through variation of the sequences and lengths of the DNA
strands, the structure and functional properties of the assembled
dendrimers can be tuned. Furthermore, due to the solid-phase
nature of the synthesis, dendrimers bearing more complex
functionality can be envisaged, and indeed, we have already
successfully attached higher generation dendrimers, chromo-
phores, and polymers to the periphery of these molecules.
Current efforts involve the exploration of the physical proper-
ties of these materials and the continued use of this strategy for
the construction of multicomponent nanoscale materials
through self-assembly.
The authors would like to thank the US Department of
Energy (DE-AC03-76SF00098) and Lawrence Berkeley Na-
tional Laboratory’s Molecular Design Institute II, funded by the
office of Naval Research (Grant No. N0001498F0402) for
support. Fellowship support (MBF) from the Miller Institute for
Basic Research in Science is gratefully acknowledged.
Scheme 2 Solid phase synthesis of oligonucleotide–dendron conjugates. (i)
3% TCA/CH2Cl2. (ii) 4, DMAP, EDC, CH2Cl2 (iii) 10% TCA/ethylene
glycol. (iv) Morpholine/methanol (1+1), 60 °C. 5a–d: DNA (5A-3A)
TTCTCTTCAGTTCACA. 6a–d: DNA (5A-3A) GCAGACGGTAATGACG.
7a–d: DNA (5A-3A) CGTCATTACCGTCTGCTGTGAACTGAAGAGAA.
The shaded sphere represents the controlled-pore glass support.
conditions were uniquely effective for the complete removal of
the acetal protecting groups without leading to depurination of
the oligonucleotide strand. The peripheral hydroxy groups
liberated by this procedure provide reactive sites that can be
further functionalized using phosphoramidites or additional
acylating agents.
The final step in the conjugate synthesis was the cleavage of
the oligonucleotide from the solid support and concomitant
removal of the nucleotide base and phosphate protecting
groups. The typical ammonium hydroxide conditions used for
this purpose could not be employed, as they readily cleaved the
ester moiety linking the dendron to the DNA strand. However,
a 2 h exposure to a 1+1 mixture of morpholine/MeOH at 60 °C
was found to remove all of the protective groups from the
oligonucleotide strand and cleave the material from the
synthesis support without interfering with the pivaloyl ester
linkage. Using this protocol, conjugate 5d was obtained with
four hydroxy groups at the periphery of the dendron. Both 6d
and 7d were cleaved from the CPG beads prior to acetal
removal, providing conjugates with isopropylidene function-
alized dendrons.
Notes and references
1 A. Adronov and J. M. J. Fréchet, Chem. Commun., 2000, 18,
1701–1710.
2 H. Ihre, O. L. De Jesús, F. C. Szoka and J. M. J. Fréchet, Bioconjug.
Chem., 2002, 13, 443–452.
3 Y. Kim and S. C. Zimmerman, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2001, 2,
733–742.
4 D. C. Tully, K. Wilder, J. M. J. Fréchet, A. R. Trimble and C. F. Quate,
Adv. Mater., 1999, 11, 314–318.
5 C. Modrakowski, S. C. Flores, M. Beinhoff and A. D. Schlüter,
Synthesis, 2001, 14 , 2143–2155.
6 S. M. Grayson and J. M. J. Fréchet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
10335–10344.
7 W. Zhang, I. D. T. Nowlan, L. M. Thomson, W. M. Lackowski and E.
E. Simanek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8914–8922.
8 F. Vögtle, S. Gestermann, R. Hesse, H. Schwierz and B. Windisch,
Progress in Polymer Science, 2000, 25, 987–1041.
9 J. M. J. Fréchet, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2002, 99, 4782–4787.
10 S. C. Zimmerman and L. J. Lawless, Top. Curr. Chem., 2001, 217,
95–120.
11 M. S. Shchepinov, K. U. Mir, J. K. Elder, M. D. Frank–Kamenetskii and
E. M. Southern, Nucleic Acids Res., 1999, 27, 3035–3041.
12 C. M. Niemeyer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4128–4158.
13 J. M. Tomkins, B. K. Nabbs, K. Barnes, M. Legido, A. J. Blacker, R. A.
McKendry and C. Abell, ChemBioChem, 2001, 5, 375–378.
14 H. Ihre, A. Hult, J. M. J. Fréchet and I. Gitsov, Macromolecules, 1998,
31, 4061–4068.
Purification of the crude conjugates was accomplished by
reverse phase HPLC; the collected fractions were analyzed by
matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight
(MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Table 1) for character-
ization. All obtained molecular weights agreed with the
calculated values to within 0.08%.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2954–2955
2955