(
)
E.A. Bijpost et al.rJournal of Organometallic Chemistry 551 1998 159–164
163
1
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
0.26 g, 0.25 mmol, 43% . H NMR CD2Cl2 d 2.86
F 000 s1050. Besides compound 2, the crystal also
contains non-coordinating diethylether molecules in a
1:2 ratio with the zirconium complex. Data were col-
lected on an Enraf-Nonius CAD-4F diffractometer an
.
Ž
Ž
.
.
Ž
m, C H2 S, 2H , 2.72 m, C H CH3 , 1H , 2.34 t,
.
Ž
.
Js6.4 Hz, ZrC H2CH, 1H , 2.29 s, SCH3, 3H , 2.03
Ž
Ž
.
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
.
Ž
s, C5 C H3 5, 15H , 1.98 s, C5 C H3 5, 15H , 0.98 d,
Ž
.
Ž
.
w
x
Js6.0 Hz, CH2CH C H3 , 3H , 0.47 bs, BC H3, 3H ,
on-line liquid nitrogen cooling system 15 at 130 K
˚
.
Ž
.
Ž
y0.78 dt, Js12.8 Hz, Js2.8 Hz, ZrC H2CH, 1H .
with Mo Ka ls0.71073 A . Unit cell parameters and
13
Ž
.
Ž
.
.
C NMR CD2Cl2 d 148.6 d, JCF s222 Hz, C6 F5 ,
orientation matrix were determined from a least-squares
Ž
Ž
w
x
137.8 d, JCF s242 Hz, C6 F5 , 136.7 d, JCF s258 Hz,
treatment of the SET4 16 setting angles of 22 high
order reflections. The unit cell was identified as tri-
clinic, space group P1. Reduced cell calculations did not
indicate any higher metric lattice symmetry 17 and
examination of the final atomic coordinates of the struc-
ture did not yield extra metric symmetry elements 18–
20 .
The structure was solved by Patterson methods and
extension of the model was accomplished by direct
methods applied to difference structure factors using the
.
Ž
Ž
. .
Ž
.
..
,
C6 F5 , 125.7 s, C5 CH3 , 74.8 ZrCH2 , 52.3
5
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
Ž
CH2 S , 38.7 CH3S , 28.0 CH CH3
. .
17.7
CH CH3 , 12.0 C5 CH3 , 10.6 bs, BCH3 . 19 F
Ž
.
Ž
Ž
Ž
.
w
x
5
Ž
.
Ž
.
NMR CD2Cl2 d-134.91 d, JFF s20.3 Hz, o-F ,
Ž
.
Ž
w
y166.80 t, JFF s20.3 Hz, p-F , y169.50 t, JFF
s
.
x
19.2 Hz, m-F . Anal. Found: C, 52.58; H, 4.57. Calc.
for C44 H44 BF15SZr: C, 53.28; H, 4.47.
3.4. General procedure for attempts to polymerise func-
w
x
tionalised 1-alkenes.
program DIRDIF 21 . The positional and anisotropic
thermal displacement parameters for the non-hydrogen
atoms were refined with block-diagonal least-squares
5
w
Ž
.
x
Ž
.
.
In a drybox h -C5Me5 2 ZrMe2 5.1 mg, 13 mmol
)
5
Ž
.
Ž
. Ž
Cp sh -C5Me5 and B C6 F5 6.5 mg, 13 mmol
3
Ž
. w x
procedures CRYLSQ 22 minimising the function Q
2
w
Ž
<
<
<
<. x
were placed in an ampoule and were dissolved in 0.4 ml
of bromobenzene or toluene to give a yellow solution.
s Ýh w Fo y k Fc . A subsequent difference
Fourier synthesis resulted in the location of most of the
hydrogen atom positions, but also showed some density
which could be correlated to a, over an inversion
centre, disordered solvent molecule of diethylether. No
discrete model could be fitted in this density. The
BYPASS procedure 23 was used to take into account
the electron density in the potential solvent area, which
resulted in an electron count of 22.3 in a volume of 207
A in the unit cell. The hydrogen atoms were included
Ž
.
The functionalised alkene 200 equivalents was then
added to the catalyst solution. The ampoule was sealed
and placed in a thermostated bath at a fixed temperature
Ž
.
25–1008C . After 5 days, the reaction mixture was
w
x
quenched with methanol and passed over a column of
silica. The resulting mixture was analyzed with GC and
GC-MS.
3
˚
3.5. General procedure for pre-complexation of 2 and 3
by Lewis acids under ethene atmosphere
in the refinement riding on their carrier atoms with their
positions calculated by using sp2 or sp3 hybridisation
at the C-atom as appropriate with a fixed C–H distance
˚
Ž .
In a drybox 10 mmol of 2 3 and 10 mmol of Lewis
of 0.98 A. Final refinement on Fo by full-matrix
Ž
Ž
.
w xw . x
Ph3C B C6 F5 ,
4
Ž
acid MgCl2 , AlCl3, B C6 F5
,
block-diagonal least-squares techniques with anisotropic
thermal displacement parameters for the non-hydrogen
atoms and one overall common thermal displacement
factor for the hydrogen atoms converged at RF s0.079
3
.
AlMe3 were placed in an NMR tube equipped with a
Young valve and dissolved in 0.4 ml CD2Cl2. The
NMR tube was taken out of the drybox and attached to
the high-vacuum line. The solution was cooled to
y1968C. The tube was evacuated and brought under
Ž
.
wRs0.088 ; WsD for 6023 reflections with I)2.5
Ž .
s I and 569 parameters. Unit weights were used
throughout the refinement. The peaks in the final differ-
ence Fourier map calculations showed residual electron
densities of no chemical significance. Neutral atom
Ž
.
ethene ;1 atm . The mixture was then warmed to
room temperature. The reaction was monitored by NMR
spectroscopy. When no further reaction was observed,
the mixture was quenched with methanol and passed
over a column of silica. The soluble organic fraction
was analyzed by GC-MS.
w
x
scattering factors 24 were used and anomalous disper-
w
x
sion factors 25 were included in F . All calculations
c
were carried out on the HP9000r735 computer at the
University of Groningen with the programme packages
5
[(
w
x
w
x
Ž
.
3.6. Crystal data and structure determination of h -
Xtal 26 , PLATON 27 calculation of geometric data
and a locally modified version of the programme
PLUTO preparation of illustrations .
)
(
)
]
C
M e
(
Z r C H C H M e C H O E t
5
5
2
2
) 2][
]
( )
2
8
[
Ž
.
MeB C6 F5
C4 H10 O
3
0.5
w
x
C45 H46 BF15OZr C4 H10O 0.5, Mr s1026.93, triclinic
8 A. Meetsma, 1992. Extended version of the program PLUTO.
Univ. of Groningen, The Netherlands, unpublished. W.D.S. Mother-
well, W. Clegg, 1978. PLUTO. Program for plotting molecular and
crystal structures. Univ. of Cambridge, England, unpublished.
Ž . Ž .
space group P1 with as10.742 3 , bs14.674 2 , cs
˚
Ž .
Ž .
Ž .
Ž .
14.827 3 A, a s 95.16 1 8, b s 102.20 1 8, g s
3
y3
˚
Ž .
96.42 1 8, Vs2254.5 8 A , Zs2, Dx s1.513 g cm
,