1020
C. Este6e, B. Vidal / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 1019–1021
Table 1. Yields and purities of sulfamides prepared according to Scheme 1
Entry
Amine R1NH2
Alcohol R2OH
Purityb
Yieldc
1a
2
3
4
5
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)ethylamine
4-Methoxyaniline
–
80
88
92
95
75
80
88
75
50
80
90
75
93
90
95
45
61
42
45
51
40
50
40
38
48
38
45
55
58
55
Benzyl alcohol
4-Chlorobenzyl alcohol
3-Methoxybenzyl alcohol
2-Methoxybenzyl alcohol
3,4-Dimethoxybenzyl alcohol
2,6-Difluorobenzyl alcohol
sec-Phenethyl alcohol
Propargyl alcohol
3-Phenyl-2-propyn-1-ol
3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)propan-1-ol
–
6
7
8d
9
10d
11d
12a
13
14
15
4-Methoxyaniline
4-Methoxyaniline
4-Methoxyaniline
Benzyl alcohol
3-Methoxybenzyl alcohol
4-Chlorobenzyl alcohol
a Obtained after cleavage of the product from resin 2.
b Purity was determined by HPLC analysis of crude products at 210 nm. Products show satisfactory NMR and MS data, which are consistent
with the proposed structure.
c The crude yields were based on weight of crude samples and were relative to the initial loading of the BAL linked resin.
d The Mitsunobu protocol was repeated twice.
1
DVB) through a reductive amination to give 2.7 Con-
version to the BOC substituted sulfamide is accom-
plished by reaction with excess (5 equivalents)
sulfamoylating reagent 1 in DMF–DCM at room tem-
perature overnight.8 After a washing regimen, the prod-
ucts (5) were efficiently and simultaneously deprotected
and cleaved from the resin with TFA–CHCl3–H2O
(50:50:1). We found that either anilines or aliphatic
primary amines attached to the BAL linker were
efficiently sulfamoylated (entries 1 and 12).
ADDP related impurities. H NMR, HPLC and MS
were performed on all sulfamides to determine the
purity and confirm the structure.
N-Alkylation could not be achieved or gave products
with very low HPLC purity with heteroarylmethyl alco-
hols (2-thiophenemethanol, 3-pyridylcarbinol), or other
aliphatic alcohols such as 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)-
ethanol.
In summary, we describe an efficient and convenient
method for the solid-phase preparation of unsymmetri-
cally substituted sulfamides. Reaction of solid-phase
bound amines with the sulfamoylating reagent 1, fol-
lowed by N-alkylation under Mitsunobu conditions,
and deprotection and cleavage from the resin leads to
the target compounds with acceptable yields and good
purities. This method is presently being automatised for
the production of libraries of compounds.
Furthermore, we decided to explore the scope and
limitations of the Mitsunobu reaction on the resin
bound intermediate 3. The reaction of different poly-
mer supported BOC sulfamides with 6 equivalents of
the alcohol, tributylphosphine and 1,1%-(azodicar-
bonyl)dipiperidine (ADDP) in DCM provided cleanly
N-alkylated products (Scheme 1).9 Again, after a wash-
ing regimen and treatment with TFA–CHCl3–H2O
(50:50:1), unsymmetrically substituted sulfamides (6)
were obtained.
Acknowledgements
Further results, which illustrate the scope of this syn-
thesis, are listed in Table 1. As shown in Table 1,
benzylic alcohols substituted by either electron donat-
ing or electron withdrawing groups work well even in
hindered benzylic alcohols (entries 2–7). Analogously,
sulfamoylated anilines are also cleanly alkylated (entries
13–15).
The authors wish to thank Professor Fernando Alberi-
cio for helpful discussions during the preparation of the
manuscript. We wish to thank Dr. Mar´ıa-Jose´ Gonza´-
lez for supplying HPLC-MS data.
Secondary benzylic alcohols (entry 8), propargylic alco-
hols (entries 9–10) as well as aliphatic alcohols (entry
11) work equally well although a double Mitsunobu
treatment was required. This result provides a clear
advantage of the solid-phase approach with respect to
what we observed when we performed the same experi-
ment in solution phase where the final compound was
contaminated with a large excess of phosphine and
References
1. (a) Spillane, W. J.; McHugh, F. A.; Burke, P. O. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 1, 13–18; (b) Kloek, J. A.;
Leschinsky, K. L. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 4028–4029.
2. McDermott, S. D.; Spillane, W. J. Synthesis 1983, 192–
195.