4274
H. P. Wang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4272–4274
3. Cox, A. D.; Der, C. J. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2002, 1,
599.
4. Hilger, R. A.; Scheulen, M. E.; Strumberg, D. Onkologie
2002, 25, 511.
sigmoidal regression. SI, the selectivity of growth inhibi-
tion of each test compound, was defined as the ratio of
IC50 on wild-type to IC50 on ras-transformed cell lines.
5. Inouye, S.; Shomura, T.; Tsuruoka, T.; Ogawa, Y.;
Watanabe, H.; Yoshida, J.; Niida, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1975, 23, 2669.
6. Shindo-Okada, N.; Makabe, O.; Nagallara, H.; Nishim-
ura, S. Mol. Carcinogen. 1989, 2, 159.
7. Krzyzosiak, W. J.; Shindo-Okada, N.; Teshima, H.;
Nakajima, K.; Nishimura, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1992, 89, 4879.
8. Monden, Y.; Hamano, T. F.; Shindo-Okada, N.; Nishim-
ura, S. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 886, 109.
9. Purro, S. A.; Bisig, C. G.; Contin, M. A.; Barra, H. S.;
Arce, C. A. Biochem. J. 2003, 375, 121.
10. Campa, M. J.; Glickman, J. F.; Yamamoto, K.; Chang, K.
J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 7654.
11. Benoit, R. M.; Eiseman, J.; Jacobs, S. C.; Kyprianou, N.
Urology 1995, 46, 370.
12. Copper, M. S.; Seton, A. W.; Stevens, M. F. G.; Westwell,
A. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 2613.
13. Scopes, D. I. C.; Hayes, N. F.; Bays, D. E.; Belton, D.;
Brain, J.; Brown, D. S.; Judd, D. B.; McElroy, A. B.;
Meerholz, C. A.; Naylor, A.; Hayes, A. G.; Sheehan, M.
J.; Birch, P. J.; Tyers, M. B. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35,
490.
The inhibitory activity of compounds 4–15 is summa-
rized in Table 1. The acid analogues 4 and 5 were slight-
ly more active than azatyrosine on inhibiting the growth
of ras-transformed cells. The ester analogues 6 showed
an IC50 about 75-fold lower than that of azatyrosine.
Comparison of the IC50 between azatyrosine and its
amide analogue 7 indicated that high lipophilicity might
increase the intracellular bioavailability for exhibiting
the inhibitory activity. Thus, we further synthesized a
series of amide analogues 8–15. As indicated in Table
1, all the amide analogues showed higher activity than
azatyrosine on both cell lines. Compound 12 exhibited
the highest activity among all the amide analogues test-
ed with IC50 16.5 2.2 lM, a concentration 458-fold
lower than that for azatyrosine. The SI of compound
12 was 138.5, indicating its high selective toxicity on
ras-transformed cells. Although cyclic tertiary amides
(13–15) showed good activity, their SIÕs were unfortu-
nately low.
In conclusion, most of the compounds exhibited an
inhibitory effect on ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells with
activities more potent than that of azatyrosine. Com-
pound 12 was the most active with the highest selective
toxicity on ras-transformed cells. Whether the activity
came from the compound per se or from azatyrosine,
the potential metabolite, need to be further investigated.
14. All compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, mass and
C, H, N elemental analysis. Spectral data of representative
compounds. 8: mp 117.0–117.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3)
d, ppm: 8.23 (pyridine-a-H, 1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz), 7.37 (Ph,
5H, m), 7.17 (pyridine-c-H, 1H, dd, J = 2.6, 8.6 Hz),
7.10 (pyridine-b-H, 1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 6.73 (NH,
1H, br), 6.19 (–CH–CO, 1H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 5.06
(Ph–CH2–, 2H, s), 4.46 (NH, 1H, br), 3.11
(–CH2CHCONHCH2–, 4H, m), 1.41 (t-Bu, 9H, s), 1.36
(–NHCH2CH2CH3, 2H, hexalet, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.77
(–NHCH2CH2CH3, 3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz); EI-MS (70 eV),
339 (100%), 248, 225, 91; Anal. Calcd for C23H31N3O4: C,
66.81; H, 7.56; N, 10.16. Found: C, 66.43; H, 7.26; N 10.20.
15. NIH 3T3 wild-type and NIH 3T3 val12-ras cells were
kindly supplied by Professor W. P. Wang of the Immu-
nology Department of National Taiwan University Med-
ical College and Dr. M. Campa of Duke University,
respectively.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by a grant supported by
Standard Pharmaceutical Company, Taiwan (1999).
References and notes
1. Ayllon, V.; Rebollo, A. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2000, 17, 65.
2. Barbacid, M. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987, 56, 779.
16. Hansen, B. M.; Nielson, S. E.; Berg, K. J. Immunol.
Methods 1989, 119, 203.