Table 1 Selected equilibrium parameters for O and CO binding (P in Torr), in toluene at 25 ¡C, except for Mb and Hb (H O, pH 7, 25 ¡C)
2
1@2
2
P
(O )
P
(CO)
M
Ref.
1@2
2
1@2
Mb
5 ] 10~1
3 ] 10~1
2 ] 10~2
1.4 ] 10~3
3 ] 10~1
8.9 ] 10~3
1.9 ] 10~1
2.9
2 ] 10~1
3 ] 10~4
3.1 ] 10~4
25
8
9
9
10
11
12
13
14
Hb (human R)
Hb (human T)
170
133
4270
8 ] 10~2
8 ] 10~1
105
100
0.3
40
38
1.6 ] 10~2
2.3
21
Fe(picket-fence)(1,2-DiMeIm)
FeG2(1,2-DiMeIm)
FeTACN(1,2-DiMeIm)
FeArC2Py
FeSFH-C7(1-MeIm)a
Fe4C2(2-MeIm), 4
Fe4Cl(2-MeIm), 3b
3 ] 10~2
9.8 ] 10~5
This work
This work
\10~5
\10~5
È
a The complex remains mostly Ðve-coordinate at the concentration of nitrogeneous base used by the authors. b To obtain a precise value, higher
dilutions than 105 would have been necessary; this is the reason why only limiting values are reported.
Our results are gathered in Table 1 together with the data
observed for natural proteins and the landmark picket-fence
References
1 M. Momenteau and C. A. Reed, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 659 and
references herein.
2 J. P. Collman, R. R. Gagne, T. R. Halbert, J.-C. Marchon and
C. A. Reed, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 7868.
model. In this Table are reported both the partial pressure at
half-saturation for O and CO binding and the partition coef-
2
Ðcient M that characterizes the preference for CO versus O
2
binding. It is deÐned as the ratio of P (O ) over P (CO), or
the ratio of K (CO) over K (O ): the lowest M gives the best
discrimination against CO. For example, FeTACN(1,2-
3 (a) J. Mispelter, M. Momenteau, D. Lavalette and J.-M. Lhoste, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 5165. (b) D. Lavalette, C. Tetreau, J.
Mispelter, M. Momenteau and J.-M. Lhoste, Eur. J. Biochem.,
1984, 145, 555.
1@2
2
1@2
eq
eq
2
DiMeIm) recently reported by Collman et al.12 (Table 1) has
4 G. E. Wuenschell, C. Tetreau, D. Lavalette and C. A. Reed, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 3346.
the same affinity for O and CO, therefore an M value equal
2
to ca. 1. In our case, it is striking that the porphyrin Fe4C2
5 B. Andrioletti, B. Boitrel and R. Guilard, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
(2-MeIm), 4, has an affinity for O 100 times greater than the
1312.
2
highest affinity already reported for synthetic models such as
6 J. P. Collman and C. A. Reed, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 2048.
7 (a) T. J. Beugelsdijk and R. S. Drago, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97,
6466. (b) J. P. Collman, J. I. Braumann, K. M. Doxsee, T. R.
Halbert and K. S. Suslick, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978, 75,
564. (c) J. R. Long and R. S. Drago, J. Chem. Educ., 1982, 59, 1037.
8 F. Antonini and M. Brunori, Hemoglobin and Myoglobin and
T heir Reactions with L igands, North Holland Publishing,
Amsterdam, 1971.
9 C. A. Sawicki and Q. H. Gibson, J. Biol. Chem., 1977, 252, 7538.
10 J. P. Collman, J. I. Brauman, B. L. Iverson, J. L. Sessler, R. M.
Morris and Q. H. Gibson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 3052.
11 J. P. Collman, L. Fu, A. Zingg and F. Diederich, Chem. Commun.,
1997, 193.
12 J. P. Collman, P. C. Herrmann, L. Fu, T. A. Eberspacher, M.
Eubanks, B. Boitrel, P. Hayoz, X. Zhang, J. I. Brauman and V. W.
Day, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 3481.
13 E. Rose, B. Boitrel, M. Quelquejeu and A. Kossanyi, T etrahedron
L ett., 1993, 34, 7267.
14 M. Momenteau, B. Loock, C. Tetreau, D. Lavalette, A. Crois, C.
Schae†er, C. Huel and J.-M. Lhoste, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin T rans.
2, 1987, 249.
15 M. Lim, T. A. Jackson and P. A. AnÐnrud, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.,
1997, 2, 531.
FeSFH-C7(1-MeIm) or FeG2(1,2-DiMeIm). It is very tempt-
ing to explain the very high affinity of our models by a
favored distal H-bonding stabilization due to the presence of
two secondary apical amines. The slightly better affinity of
porphyrin 3 could be explained by a stronger H bond
resulting from a shorter distance between the amino group
and dioxygen, illustrating that in our models, the e†ective dis-
crimination comes from stabilization of O (presumably
2
through hydrogen bonding) rather than CO destabilization by
steric e†ects.15 On the other hand, the observed CO affinity is
also very high and quite comparable to the FeSFH-C7
(1-MeIm) of Momenteau et al.14 (see Table 1). It is also worth
noting that these two observations are consistent with the
pocket shaped by the TREN that is apparently not congested
enough to a†ect signiÐcantly the CO affinity in terms of steric
e†ects.
In conclusion, “arborÏ porphyrins are the Ðrst models of
myoglobin with speciÐc features such as a polar-capped struc-
ture, including secondary amines in an almost apical position,
as potential H-bonding groups. Our preliminary studies show
that these models are both very stable in oxygenated solution
and show reversible binding. The two di†erent linkers,
employed to graft the TREN, lead to a signiÐcant discrimi-
nation against CO, the M values being close to 0.1. Further
studies are in progress, Ðrst to conÐrm the role of the capping
structure and the potential H-bonding secondary amines, and
secondly to determine the kinetic rates.
Received in Strasbourg, France, 8th July 1998;
L etter 8/05357J
1332
New J. Chem., 1998, Pages 1331È1332