Syntheses
mon refined P–H distance (1.245(15) Å) was used for the
refinement. The largest hole and peak in the final Fourier-
difference map were Ϫ0.86 and 0.74 e ÅϪ3 (ca. 1.2 Å from Dy(1)
and O(11)).
[Ln(H2PO2)3(H2O)n] (types A and AЈ, n ؍
1; C, n ؍
0), gen-
eral procedure. Sodium hypophosphite (ca. 1.00 g) was dis-
solved in pH 1.4 (KCl–HCl) buffer solution (10 ml). Hydrated
lanthanide chloride (ca. 1.20 g) in the buffer solution (10
ml) was added. The mixture was allowed to stand in air at
room temperature for one hour. A solid precipitated from
solution where Ln = La–Eu, Dy–Lu. For Ln = Gd or Tb
addition of a seed crystal resulted in rapid precipitation from
the supersaturated solution. The resulting solids, bearing the
characteristic colour of the Ln3ϩ ions, were collected by suction
filtration, washed with water, and dried at the pump. Yields 61–
89%. Representative analyses: [Ce(H2PO2)3(H2O)], found P
26.1, H8CeO7P3 requires 26.3%; [Dy(H2PO2)3], found P 25.6.
H6DyO6P3 requires 26.0%; [Sm(H2PO2)3(H2O)], M found 366,
theoretical 363; [Eu(H2PO2)3(H2O)], M found 362, theoretical
365.
[Pr(H2PO2)(HPO3)(H2O)]ؒH2O. The structure was solved by
Patterson methods.32
A common refined P–H distance
(1.266(26) Å) was used, which was considered a reasonable step
in the light of the similarity of the IR stretching frequencies.
Some systematic error in the data necessitated that phosphite O
atoms be weakly restrained to be isotropic to prevent ‘non-
positive definite’ collapse. Water H atoms were restrained to sit
30% along the length of their putative hydrogen-bonding vec-
tors and, as a result, the refinement was unstable and required
damping. Final error limits were estimated using undamped
cycles of refinement. The largest hole and peak in the final
Fourier-difference map were Ϫ1.29 and 3.99 e ÅϪ3 (at Pr).
CCDC reference number 186/1450.
[Ln(H2PO2)3] (type B). Stoichiometric amounts of sodium
hypophosphite and the lanthanide chloride were dissolved sep-
arately in the minimum amount of water. On mixing a precipi-
tate was formed immediately, and the reaction mixture heated
under reflux under nitrogen for several hours. Needle-like crys-
tals formed of the colour of the corresponding Ln3ϩ ion, which
were collected by suction filtration, washed with water, and
dried at the pump. Yields 51–69%. [Pr(H2PO2)3)], M found 336,
theoretical 336.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of the EPSRC’s
X-Ray Crystallography Service, and Chemical Database
Service at Daresbury. Thanks are due to Stephanie Barnett for
simulations of powder patterns, and to all in the Divison of
Ceramics for use of apparatus.
References
[Tb(H2PO2)3] (type C) from [Tb(H2PO2)3(H2O)] (type AЈ). A
small quantity of [Tb(H2PO2)3(H2O)] was stirred under reflux
with excess of trimethyl orthoformate in a nitrogen atmosphere
for 2 h. The resulting material was filtered in a dry-box, washed
with dry thf and allowed to dry.
1 X.-Z. Zhang, A.-L. Guo, Y.-T. Xu, X.-F. Li and P.-N. Sun,
Polyhedron, 1987, 6, 1041.
2 F. A. Hart, in Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, eds. G.
Wilkinson, R. D. Gillard and J. A. McCleverty, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1987, vol. 3.
3 M. D. Marcos, R. Ibanez, P. Amoros and A. LeBail, Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1991, 47, 1152.
[Ln(H2PO2)(HPO3)(H2O)n]ؒH2O (type 1, n ؍
1; 2, n ؍
0).
Air oxidation of the lanthanide hypophosphite complexes,
monitored by IR spectroscopy, was achieved by in situ air oxid-
ation on heating the lanthanide chloride with sodium hypo-
phosphite in aqueous solution on a steam-bath for several
hours. Needle like crystals were formed for the praseodymium
and neodymium complex, whilst for the later lanthanides the
complexes were obtained as fine powders. The products were
filtered off, washed with water and dried in air at the pump.
Representative analyses: [Nd(H2PO2)(HPO3)(H2O)]ؒH2O, M
found 301, theoretical 325; [Tm(H2PO2)(HPO3)], M found 316,
theoretical 314; [Lu(H2PO2)(HPO3)], M found 325, theoretical
320.
4 T. J. R. Weakley, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1979, 35, 42.
5 M. D. Marcos, P. Amoros, F. Sapina, A. Beltran-Porter,
R. Martinez-Manez and J. P. Attfield, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 5044.
6 T. Matsuzaki and Y. Itaka, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1969, 25, 1932.
7 B. O. Loopstra, Int. Estab. Nucl. Energy Res. Publ., 1958, 15, 64.
8 A. R. Pedrazuela, S. Garcia-Blanco and L. Rivoir, An. Soc. Esp. Fis.
Quim., 1953, 49, 255.
9 T. Akimoto, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tokyo, 1965.
10 T. J. R. Weakley, J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 1983, 5, 279.
11 T. J. R. Weakley and W. W. L. Watt, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1979,
35, 3023.
12 P. A. Tanner, T. Sze, T. C. Mak and W. Yip, J. Cryst. Spectrosc. Res.,
1992, 22, 25.
13 P. A. Tanner, S.-T Hung, T. C. W. Mak and W. Ru-Ji, Polyhedron,
1992, 11, 817.
14 W. H. Zachariasen and R. C. L. Mooney, J. Chem. Phys., 1934, 2, 34.
15 V. M. Ionov, L. A. Aslanov, V. B. Rybakov and M. A. Porai-Koshits,
Kristallografiya, 1973, 18, 403.
16 V. M. Ionov, L. A. Aslanov, M. A. Porai-Koshits and V. B. Rybakov,
Kristallografiya, 1973, 18, 405.
17 J. A. Seddon, A. R. W. Jackson, R. A. Kresinski and A. W. G. Platt,
Polyhedron, 1996, 15, 1899.
18 L. A. Aslanov, V. M. Ionov, M. A. Porai-Koshits, V. G. Lebedev,
B. N. Kulikovskii, O. N. Gilyarov and T. L. Novoderezhkina, Izv.
Acad. Nauk. SSSR, Neorg. Mater., 1975, 11, 96.
19 J. Laane and J. R. Ohlsen, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1980, 27, 465.
20 K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and
Coordination Compounds, 4th edn., Wiley, New York, 1986.
21 J. W. Mellor, Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical
Chemistry, Longmans, New York, London, 1971, vol. 8, suppl. 3.
22 E. K. Davies, SNOOPI, Chemical Crystallography Laboratory,
University of Oxford, 1982.
23 The United Kingdom Chemical Database Service, D. A Fletcher,
R. F. McMeeking and D. Parkin, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996,
36, 746.
24 D. L. Faithfull, J. M. Harrowfield, M. I. Ogden, B. W. Skelton,
K. Third and A. H. White, Aust. J. Chem., 1992, 45, 583.
25 M. C. Favas, D. L. Kepert, B. W. Skelton and A. H. White, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1980, 454.
Crystallography
Diffraction data were collected, using Mo-Kα radiation,
according to previously published procedures.29 Non-H atoms
were modelled30 anisotropically, and H atoms isotropically,
these being placed in theoretical positions. Following con-
vergence of full-matrix least-squares refinement30 using merged
data, these were corrected31 for absorption effects and refine-
ment resumed to convergence.
[Ce(H2PO2)3(H2O)]. The structure was solved by isomorph-
ous replacement.15 A common refined P–H distance (1.309(14)
Å) was used, and water H atoms were restrained to sit 30%
along the length of their putative hydrogen-bonding vectors
and, as a result, the refinement was unstable and required slight
damping. Final error limits were estimated using undamped
cycles of refinement. The largest hole and peak in the final
Fourier-difference map were Ϫ1.08 and 1.40 e ÅϪ3 (at Ce).
[Dy(H2PO2)3]. Data were collected as for triclinic symmetry,
and transformed to the above system. The structure was solved
by trial placement of heavy atoms at special positions. A com-
26 M. A. Porai-Koshits and L. A. Aslanov, J. Struct. Chem., 1978, 13,
244.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 2189–2196
2195