Thiaplatinacycles Derived from Phosphites
Organometallics, Vol. 22, No. 23, 2003 4737
for 2a , C24H38O3P2PtS: C, 43.43; H, 5.73; S, 4.82. Found: C,
42.98; H, 5.68; S, 5.07. FAB+: m/z 664. Mp: 109-114 °C. NMR
Indeed, the use of diphosphines such as dppe (1,2-bis-
(diphenylphosphino)ethane) affords a better yield than
that with alkylic monophosphines, but a bit lower when
compared with phosphite-containing thiaplatinacycles.
For compounds 2b to 4 the observed trends seem to be
related to the corresponding cone angle for phosphites,
the best yield being observed for the complex containing
the phosphite with the smaller cone angle. Perhaps
associated with such small cone angle for P(OEt)3 all
the expected compounds derived from the phosphine
substitution were observed and isolated. In contrast, for
P(OiPr)3 and P(OPh)3 only one particular isomer could
be observed and isolated.
1
spectra were as follows. H: δ 0.85 (m, 9H, CH3-, Et-P); 1.2
(m, 9H, CH3-, EtO-P); 1.7 (m, 6H, -CH2-, Et-P); 4.15 (m,
6H, -CH2-, EtO-P); 6.85-7.1 (m, 4H); 7.4-7.6 (m, 4H). 31P-
{1H}: δ 15.4 (d, (1J (Pt-P) ) 3084 Hz, 2J (P-P) ) 28 Hz); 123.3
2
(1J (Pt-P) ) 3065 Hz, J (P-P) ) 28 Hz). 13C{1H}: δ 8.11 (d,
2
3
CH3, J (P-C) 15 Hz, Et-P); 16.5 (d, CH3, J (P-C) 2 Hz, EtO-
P); 16.7 (d, -CH2-, 1J (P-C) 33 Hz, Et-P); 61.4 (m, br, -CH2-,
EtO-P); 123.3 (s, CH); 124.2 (s, CH); 126.0 (s, CH); 126.2 (s,
CH); 126.3 (s, CH); 126.8 (d, CH, 4J (P-C) 8 Hz); 130.4 (s, CH);
135.9 (d, CH, 3J (P-C) 10 Hz); 136.8 (m, br, C); 143.1 (s, C);
148.9 (s, C), 164.0 (w, br, C).
Yield for 2b: 20%. Anal. Calcd for 2b, C24H38O3P2PtS: C,
43.43; H, 5.73; S, 4.82. Found: C, 42.99; H, 5.70; S, 5.00.
FAB+: m/z 664. Mp: 101-102 °C. NMR spectra were as
Con clu sion s
1
follows. H: δ 0.9-1.2 (m, 18H, CH3-, Et-P and EtO-P); 2.0
(m, 6H, -CH2-, Et-P); 3.8 (m, 6H, -CH2-, EtO-P); 6.85-7.1
(m, 4H); 7.4-7.6 (m, 4H). 31P{1H}: δ 10.6 (d, (1J (Pt-P) ) 1691
Hz, 2J (P-P) ) 28 Hz); 104.7 (1J (Pt-P) ) 5405 Hz, 2J (P-P) )
28 Hz). 13C{1H}: δ 8.28 (d, CH3, 2J (P-C) 14 Hz, Et-P); 14.8
(d, -CH2-, 1J (P-C) 29 Hz, Et-P); 15.7 (d, CH3-, 3J (P-C) 7
Hz, EtO-P); 61.4 (m, br, -CH2-, EtO-P); 123.2 (s, CH); 124.3
(s, CH); 125.9 (s, CH); 126.2 (s, CH); 126.4 (s, CH); 126.9 (s,
The phosphine substitution by a phosphite in [Pt(η2-
C,S-C12H8)(PEt3)2] is a feasible process to produce
complexes of the type [Pt(η2-C,S-C12H8)(PEt3)(P(OR)3)]
in good yields and purity, avoiding the reductive elimi-
nation of DBT. Even when the conditions for achieving
a complete HDS cycle for DBT have not yet been
established, these results do indicate the importance in
the reaction of the thiaplatinacycle as intermediates or
precursors. We have also demonstrated that the pres-
ence of at least one σ-donor/ π-acceptor ligand, with a
small cone angle, such as triethyl phosphite, is a key
factor for improvement of HDS and the promoter effect
of both acid and basic alumina.
3
2
CH); 130.7 (s, CH); 136.9 (d, CH, J (P-C) 9 Hz, J (Pt-C) 45
2
Hz); 138.9 (pt, C, J (Pt-C) 25 Hz); 143.1 (s, C); 148.6 (pt, C,
2
2J (Pt-C) 75 Hz), 154.4 (d, C, J (P-C) 90 Hz). For complex 5,
yield was 10% approximately determined in solution by 31P-
{1H} NMR, with signals at δ 107.0 (1J (Pt-P) ) 2938 Hz, 2J (P-
P) ) 44 Hz); 123.3 (1J (Pt-P) ) 5160 Hz, 2J (P-P) ) 44 Hz).
P r ep a r a tion of [P t(η2-C,S-C12H8)(P Et3)(P (OiP r )3)], 3. 3
was prespared by a procedure similar to that described above,
using 0.25 g (0.40 mmol) of 1 dissolved in toluene (10 mL),
adding tri-isopropyl phosphite (0.2 mL, 0.8 mmol) under argon.
The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C for 3 h with stirring.
After this the reaction was evaporated to dryness to yield a
viscous residue, which was further dried for 2 h. Freshly
distilled dried hexane was added (3 × 3 mL) and filtered to
yield a yellow residue, which was dried for 2 h. Yield for 3:
95%. Anal. Calcd for 3, C27H44O3P2PtS: C, 45.95; H, 6.24; S,
4.54. Found: C, 45.57; H, 6.43; S, 4.61. FAB+: m/z 706. Mp:
165-167 °C with decomposition. NMR spectra were as follows.
1H: δ 0.85-1.0 (m, 9H, CH3-, Et-P); 1.2-1.4 (m, 18H, CH3-,
iPrO-P); 1.75 (m, 6H, -CH2-, Et-P); 5.0 (m, 3H, -CH-, iPrO-
P); 6.85-7.1 (m, 4H); 7.4-7.6 (m, 4H). 31P{1H}: δ 14.8 (d,
(1J (Pt-P) ) 3118 Hz, 2J (P-P) ) 29 Hz); 120.5 (1J (Pt-P) )
Exp er im en ta l Section
All reactions were carried out using standard Schlenk
techniques under argon. Solvents were dried and distilled
before use. Deuterated solvents (Aldrich) for NMR experiments
were dried over molecular sieves. All other chemicals, filter
aids, and chromatographic materials were reagent grade and
used as received. 1H, 13C{1H}, and 31P{1H} NMR spectra were
determined on a Varian Unity (300 MHz) or a Bruker (500
MHz) spectrometer in CDCl3, unless otherwise stated; chemi-
cal shifts (δ) are relative to the deuterated solvent, and 31P
NMR spectra are relative to external H3PO4. Infrared spectra
were obtained in a Perkin-Elmer 1600 FT spectrophotometer.
Mass determinations (FAB+) were performed on a J EOL SX-
102 A, using a nitrobenzilic alcohol matrix, and GC-MS
determinations were performed on a Varian Saturn 3. Gal-
braith Laboratories carried out elemental analyses. Melting
points were determined in a Electrothermal digital melting
point apparatus. The synthesis of [Pt(η2-C,S-C12H8)(PEt3)2] was
carried out using the previously reported procedure.4 All
phosphites were purchased from Strem and dried over molec-
ular sieves.
P r ep a r a t ion of [P t (η2-C,S-C12H8)(P E t3)(P (OE t )3)], 2a ,
2b, a n d [P t(η2-C,S-C12H8)(P (OEt)3)2], 5. All three compounds
were formed in the same reaction from [Pt(η2-C,S-C12H8)-
(PEt3)2] (0.5 g, 0.81 mmol), 1, dissolved in toluene (10 mL),
adding triethyl phosphite (0.55 mL, 3.25 mmol) under argon.
The reaction mixture was allowed to react at room tempera-
ture for 6 h with stirring. After this time the mixture was
evaporated to dryness with increasing vacuum (0.01 mmHg)
and further dried for 4 h. The residue was redisolved in the
minimum amount of acetone, complex 2a being precipitated
from the reaction mixture with ice cooling and addition of
hexane. The remaining mixture was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel with hexane/acetone as eluent
(from 9:1 to 1:1); the fourth colorless fraction was evaporated
to dryness to yield complex 2b. Complex 5 was detected only
in the original reaction mixture. Yield for 2a : 70%. Anal. Calcd
2
2
3062 Hz, J (P-P) ) 29 Hz). 13C{1H}: δ 8.1 (d, CH3, J (P-C)
1
24 Hz, Et-P); 16.6 (d, -CH2-, J (P-C) 33 Hz, Et-P); 24.3 (s,
CH3, iPrO-P); 69.9 (s, br, -CH-, iPrO-P); 123.2 (s, CH); 124.1
(s, CH); 125.8 (s, CH); 126.05 (s, CH); 126.1 (s, CH); 126.7 (d,
4
3
CH, J (P-C) 9 Hz); 130.3 (s, CH); 136.2 (d, CH, J (P-C) 6.5
Hz); 139.0 (m, br, C); 143.1 (s, C); 148.8 (s, C), 164.5 (w, br,
C).
P r ep a r a tion of [P t(η2-C,S-C12H8)(P Et3)(P (OP h )3)], 4. 4
was prepared following a procedure similar to that described
above, using 0.25 g (0.40 mmol) of 1 dissolved in toluene (10
mL), adding triphenyl phosphite (0.3 mL, 1.15 mmol) under
argon. The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C for 3 h with
stirring. After this the reaction was evaporated to dryness to
yield a white viscous residue, which was further dried for 3 h.
Freshly distilled dried hexane was added (3 × 3 mL) and
filtered to yield an ivory residue, which was dried for 3 h. Yield
for 4: 92%. Anal. Calcd for 4, C36H38O3P2PtS: C, 53.53; H,
4.70; S, 3.96. Found: C, 53.44; H, 4.63; S, 3.97. FAB+: m/z
808. Mp: 150-152 °C. NMR spectra were as follows. 1H: δ
0.9-1.1 (m, 9H, CH3-, Et-P); 2.0 (m, br, 6H, -CH2-, Et-P);
6.85-7.3 (m, 19H); 7.5-7.65 (m, 4H). 31P{1H}: δ 10.15 (d,
(1J (Pt-P) ) 1645 Hz, 2J (P-P) ) 27 Hz); 94.3 (1J (Pt-P) ) 5623
Hz, 2J (P-P) ) 27 Hz). 13C{1H}: δ 8.3 (d, CH3, 2J (P-C) 12 Hz,
Et-P); 15.1 (d, -CH2-, 1J (P-C) 29 Hz, Et-P); 120.2 (s, CH,
PhO-P); 123.1 (s, CH); 124.4 (s, CH); 124.8 (s, CH, PhO-P);