F(000) = 836. l = 0.71073 Å, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.544 mm21. The data were
collected on an Enraf Nonius CAD4 diffractometer. Intensity measurements
were performed by w–q scans in the range 6 < 2q < 44° at 19 °C on a
crystal of dimensions 0.45 3 0.40 3 0.38 mm. Of the 5916 measured
reflections, 5577 were independent; largest minimum and maximum in the
final difference Fourier synthesis: 20.415 and 1.422 e Å23, R1 = 0.077 and
wR2 = 0.251 [for 4025 reflections with F > 4s(F)]. The structure was
solved by direct methods (SHELXS-97) and refined by least-squares against
F2 (SHELXL-97). CCDC 182/1374. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/
1999/1839/ for crystallographic data in .cif format.
Scheme 2
1 R. Andre´s, M. Galakhov, M. P. Go´mez-Sal, A. Mart´ın, M. Mena and C.
Santamar´ıa, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 1206.
2 M. Galakhov, M. Mena and C. Santamar´ıa, Chem. Commun., 1998,
691.
3 R. Andre´s, M. Galakhov, A. Mart´ın, M. Mena and C. Santamar´ıa,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 551; R. Andre´s, Thesis Doctoral,
Universidad de Alcala´, Madrid, 1995.
4 (a) R. Blom, K. Rypdal, M. Mena, P. Royo and R. Serrano,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1990, 391, 47; (b) S. G. Blanco, M. P. Go´mez-
Sal, S. M. Carreras, M. Mena, P. Royo and R. Serrano, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1986, 1572; (c) P. Go´mez-Sal, A. Mart´ın, M. Mena
and C. Ye´lamos, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 242; (d) R. Andre´s, M.
Galakhov, A. Mart´ın, M. Mena and C. Santamar´ıa, Organometallics,
1994, 13, 2159; (e) R. Andre´s, M. Galakhov, M. P. Go´mez-Sal, A.
Mart´ın, M. Mena and C. Santamar´ıa, J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 526,
135.
5 G. S. Herrmann, H. G. Alt and U. Thewalt, J. Organomet. Chem., 1990,
393, 83; R. Beckhaus, I. Strauss and T. Wagner, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1994, 464, 155; R. Beckhaus, J. Sang, J. Oster and T. Wagner,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1994, 484, 179; R. Beckhaus, J. Sang, T. Wagner
and B. Ganter, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 1176; J. J. Eisch, A. M.
Piotrowski, S. K. Brownstein, E. J. Gabe and F. L. Lee, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1985, 107, 7219; R. Beckhaus, M. Wagner and R. Wang, Z. Anorg.
Allg. Chem., 1998, 624, 277.
6 J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry. Reactions, Mechanism, and
Structure, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1985.
7 A. Mart´ın, M. Mena, C. Ye´lamos, R. Serrano and P. R. Raithby,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1991, 467, 79.
8 P. Go´mez-Sal, A. Mart´ın, M. Mena and C. Ye´lamos, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1995, 2185.
9 Although all the Ti–O distances are similar, the Ti–O–Ti angles present
very different values if they form the distorted square (95.6°) or the rest
of the core (123°).
10 T. Carofiglio, C. Floriani, A. Sgamellotti, M. Rosi, A. Chiesi-Villa and
C. Rizzoli, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1992, 1081.
11 S. I. Troyanov, V. Varga and K. Mach, J. Organomet. Chem., 1991, 402,
201.
ylidyne) bonds to generate the species A which was not
detected. b-Hydrogen elimination2 would then give a hydride–
enamine intermediate B while subsequent carbon–nitrogen
bond rupture, transfer of hydrogen from titanium to the b-
carbon and formation of a nitrogen–titanium bond, would afford
the s-alkenyl-m-imido complex 2. However, we can not exclude
the possibility that the conversion of A to 2 could occur directly
by a concerted pathway.
To our knowledge, this observed behaviour is comparable
only to the alkylidene/imine metathesis-like reactions reported
by Rocklage and Schrock,12 and by Cantrell and Meyer13 for
mononuclear niobium, tantalum and molybdenum alkylidene
complexes. In our case the metathesis-like process occurs on the
Ti3O3 surface with the cooperative participation of the three
metal atoms and opens new perspectives in trinuclear titanium
chemistry. Further studies of this process with other imines are
in progress and the results will be published in due course.
The authors thank the financial support from the DGES
(PB96-0672).
Notes and references
‡ Preparation of 2: N-benzylidene(phenyl)amine (0.356 g, 197 mmol) was
added to a solution of 1 (1.0 g, 164 mmol) in 60 mL of hexane. The reaction
mixture was irradiated at room temp. for 45 h with a UV lamp. The final
reddish solution was concentrated and cooled to obtain red crystals of 2.
Yield: 0.90 g (ca. 75%). Anal. Calc. for C44H57NO3Ti3, (M = 791.64): C,
66.76; H, 7.26; N, 1.77. Found: C, 67.28; H, 7.69; N, 1.72%. Selected NMR
1
data (d, J/Hz): H (500 MHz, C6D6, 25 °C, TMS): 1.95 (s, 30H, C5Me5),
3
3
2.09 (s, 15H, C5Me5), 8.04 (d, 1H, J 18.3, –CHNCHPh), 6.84 (d, 1H, J
18.3, –CHNCHPh); 13C{1H} (125 MHz, C6D6, 25 °C, TMS): 11.7, 12.20
(C5Me5), 122.6, 122.5 (C5Me5), 140.2 (dm, 1J 154.4, –CHNCHPh), 158.9,
(Cipso, m-NPh), 190.4 (dd, 1J 126.0, 2J 2.5, –CHNCHPh). IR (KBr, cm21):
n 3052w, 2913s, 1581m, 1542w, 1488w, 1440s, 1375s, 1245s, 1024m,
898s, 759w, 729s, 688s, 397s. EI mass spectrum m/z 792 (M+, 11%).
§ Single crystals of 2 were obtained by slow cooling of a hexane solution.
12 S. M. Rocklage and R. R. Schrock, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104,
3077.
13 G. K. Cantrell and T. Y. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8035.
¯
Crystal data for 2: C44H57NO3Ti3, M = 791.61, triclinic, space group P1,
a = 11.4865(1), b = 12.559(1), c = 16.049(1) Å, a = 87.64(1), b =
89.82(1), g = 82.87(1)°, V = 2295.3(3) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.145 g cm23
;
Communication 9/05129E
1840
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1839–1840