Paper
Dalton Transactions
General synthesis of [(TPA)Cu(4′-R-PhC(O)CHC(O)4′-R-Ph)]
ClO4 (3–6)
tion containing an insoluble precipitate for all derivatives. The
solutions were then combined and stirred overnight (16 h),
resulting in the formation of a clear green solution. Difficulties
in producing analytically pure crystalline products led us to
collect ESI-MS data for each final reaction mixture. This data
indicated the presence of the following ions: [(TPA)Cu(4′-
Under an inert atmosphere at ∼30 °C, Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O
(0.135 mmol) was dissolved in CH3CN (∼3 mL) and added to
solid TPA (0.135 mmol). The resulting deep blue solution was
stirred for 30 min. In a separate container, 1,3-bis(4′-R-
R-PhC(O)CClC(O)4′-R-Ph)]+,
[(TPA)Cu(4′-R-PhC(O)CHC(O)4′-
phenyl)-1,3-propanedione (R
= –H, –CH3, –OCH3, –Cl)
R-Ph)]+, [(TPA)Cu(O2C-4′-R-Ph)]+ and [(TPA)CuCl]+. These ions
suggested aliphatic C–C bond cleavage reactivity and dehalo-
genation within the diketonate moiety under anaerobic con-
ditions. Notably, attempted crystallization of 9 resulted in the
deposition of crystals of the dehalogenated product 5 and
[(TPA)Cu–Cl]2[Li(ClO4)3] (11).
(0.135 mmol) was combined with lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)
amide (0.135 mmol) dissolved in Et2O (∼3 mL) and stirred for
5 min. In all cases, this produced a murky solution containing
an insoluble white precipitate. The two solutions were then
combined and stirred for an hour, resulting in the formation
of a green reaction mixture. The solvent was then removed
under reduced pressure and the residual solid was dissolved in
CH2Cl2. This solution was passed through a Celite plug and
the eluent was brought to dryness under vacuum. Crystals suit-
able for X-ray diffraction were grown by vapor diffusion of Et2O
into a CH2Cl2 solution of 3–6. Yields and characterization data
are stated below:
Independent synthesis of [(TPA)Cu(O2CPh)]ClO4 (12)
Under an inert atmosphere at ∼30 °C, Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O
(0.0675 mmol) dissolved in CH3CN (∼3 mL) and added to
solid TPA (0.0675 mmol). The resulting deep blue solution was
stirred for 30 min. This solution was then added to a vial con-
taining solid sodium benzoate (0.0675 mmol). Following
addition of methanol sufficient to produce a homogenous
mixture, the solution was stirred overnight (16 h). After
removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the remaining
solid was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (∼3 mL), and the solution
passed through a Celite plug. The filtrate was collected and
brought to dryness under reduced pressure. Crystals suitable
for X-ray diffraction were grown by vapor diffusion of Et2O into
a solution of 12 dissolved in 1 : 1 CH3CN : CH2Cl2. Yield:
18.1 mg (47%). Anal. calc. C25H23ClCuN4O6·0.6CH2Cl2: C,
49.16; H, 3.90; N, 8.96. Found: C, 49.08; H, 3.70; N, 8.95.
ESI-MS: m/z calc. for C25H23CuN4O2, 474.1 [M − ClO4]+; found
474.2 [M − ClO4]+.
[(TPA)Cu(PhC(O)CHC(O)Ph)]ClO4 (3). (22 mg, 22%). Anal.
calc. for C33H29ClCuN4O6: C, 58.58; H, 4.32; N, 8.28. Found: C,
58.52; H, 4.17; N, 7.85. ESI-MS: m/z calc. for C33H29CuN4O2,
576.2 [M − ClO4]+; found 576.3 [M − ClO4]+. UV–vis (CH3CN)
λmax, nm (ε, M−1 cm−1): 356 (16 270). FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 1600,
1550, 1520, 1380, 1090(νClO ), 630(νClO ).
4
4
[(TPA)Cu(4′-CH3-PhC(O)CHC(O)4′-CH3-Ph)]ClO4 (4). (27 mg,
29%). Anal. calc. for C35H33ClCuN4O6·0.1CH2Cl2: C, 59.11; H,
4.69; N, 7.86. Found: C, 58.89; H, 4.51; N, 7.85. ESI-MS: m/z
calc. for C35H33CuN4O2, 604.2 [M − ClO4]+; found 604.3 [M −
ClO4]+. UV–vis (CH3CN) λmax, nm (ε, M−1 cm−1): 360 (18 230).
FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 1590, 1530, 1370, 1090(νClO ), 620(νClO ).
4
4
[(TPA)Cu(4′-OCH3-PhC(O)CHC(O)4′-OCH3-Ph)]ClO4
(5).
(34 mg, 35%). Anal calc. for C35H33ClCuN4O8·0.2CH2Cl2: C,
56.10; H, 4.47; N, 7.43. Found: C, 55.76; H, 4.19; N, 7.43.
ESI-MS: m/z calc. for C35H33CuN4O4, 636.2 [M − ClO4]+; found
636.3 [M − ClO4]+. UV–vis (CH3CN) λmax, nm (ε, M−1 cm−1):
367 (22 030). FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 1600, 1530, 1370, 1260, 1180,
1090(νClO ), 620(νClO ).
Organic product isolation from reaction mixtures of 7–10
To gain insight into the anaerobic diketonate cleavage and
dehalogenation reactivity occurring in the reaction mixtures of
7–10 the organic products of each reaction were isolated and
characterized. Under an inert atmosphere in a N2-filled glove-
box at ∼30 °C, Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.0675 mmol) was dissolved in
CH3CN (∼2 mL) and added to solid TPA (0.0675 mmol). The
deep blue solution was stirred for approximately 30 min. In a
separate vial, 2-chloro-1,3-bis(4′-R-phenyl)-1,3-propanedione (R
= –H, –CH3, –OCH3, –Cl) (0.0675 mmol) was combined with
lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (0.0675 mmol) in Et2O
(∼2 mL). This solution was stirred for 5 min, producing a
yellow mixture with insoluble precipitate for all derivatives.
The solutions were then combined and stirred for 48 h. One
equivalent of triphenylmethane (Ph3CH) was then added as an
4
4
[(TPA)Cu(4′-Cl-PhC(O)CHC(O)4′-Cl-Ph)]ClO4 (6). (12 mg,
12%). Anal calc. for C33H27Cl3CuN4O6: C, 53.17; H, 3.65; N,
7.52. Found: C, 53.48; H, 3.61; N, 7.50. ESI-MS: m/z calc. for
C33H27Cl2CuN4O2, 644.1 [M − ClO4]+; found 644.1 [M − ClO4]+.
UV–vis (CH3CN) λmax, nm (ε, M−1 cm−1): 363 (19 650). FT-IR
(KBr, cm−1): 1589, 1530, 1365, 1093(νClO ), 626(νClO ).
4
4
Attempted syntheses of [(TPA)Cu(4′-R-PhC(O)CClC(O)4′-R-Ph)]
ClO4 (7–10)
Under an inert atmosphere at ∼30 °C, Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O internal standard and the solvent removed under reduced
(0.135 mmol) was dissolved in CH3CN (∼3 mL) and added to pressure. The solid residue was removed from the glovebox,
solid TPA (0.135 mmol). The resulting deep blue solution was dissolved in ethyl acetate and passed through a silica plug.
stirred for 30 min. In a separate vial, 2-chloro-1,3-bis(4′-R- The eluent was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the
phenyl)-1,3-propanedione (R
= –H, –CH3, –OCH3, –Cl) solvent removed by rotary evaporation. The remaining solid
1
(0.135 mmol) was combined with lithium bis(trimethylsilyl) was dissolved in CDCl3 and the H NMR spectrum obtained.
amide (0.135 mmol) dissolved in Et2O (∼3 mL) and the result- The retro-Claisen 2-chloro-1-(4′-R-phenyl)ethanone products
ing mixture was stirred for 5 min. This produced a yellow solu- were identified by comparison of spectral features to analyti-
1714 | Dalton Trans., 2021, 50, 1712–1720
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021