T. Tokunaga et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1789–1792
1791
in CHO cells over-expressing GHS-R, compound 4i was
demonstrated to possess a partial agonistic activity,13,16
with 91% of the maximal response obtained by ghrelin
and an EC50 of 17 nM, while 4b displayed 65% of the
maximal response with an EC50 of 11 nM. The reason
for the dissociation of the IC50 value in the binding
assay from the EC50 value in the FLIPR assay was
unclear. Administration of 4i orally increased body
weight gain in a dose dependent manner after 4 days
in rats. When 4i was administered at doses of 2, 6 and
20 mg/kg twice a day for 4 days, the body weight gains
were 11.6, 13.6 and 21.1 g, respectively, whereas the dis-
tilled water administered control group showed body
weight gain of 5.0 g (Fig. 2). These body weight gains
were greater than those of SM-130686 at the corre-
sponding doses.12 In a rat pharmacokinetic study, Cmax
and bioavailability of 4i were 491 ng/mL and 28%,
respectively, after oral dose of 20 mg/kg. When intrave-
nously administered to rats with 5 mg/kg, Cl, Vd and t1/2
were 51 mL/min/kg, 5.4 L/kg and 1.6 h, respectively.
This pharmacokinetic profile was quite similar to that
of SM-130686.12 Although serum protein bindings of
both compounds were not measured, we assume that
the greater in vivo efficacy of 4i compared to SM-
130686 would simply be attributed to the increased
potency.
such as 4i, modification of these compounds may lead
to the identification of a new class of antiobesity drugs
mediated by the modulation of the ghrelin receptor
(GHS receptor).
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. K. Ushiroda for synthetic contributions.
We also appreciate Mr. T. Watanabe for obtaining the
pharmacokinetic data.
References and notes
1. Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.;
Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Nature 1999, 402, 656.
2. Banks, W. A.; Tschop, M.; Robinson, S. M.; Heiman, M.
L. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 302, 822.
3. Takaya, K.; Ariyasu, H.; Kanamoto, N.; Iwakura, H.;
Yoshimoto, A.; Harada, M.; Mori, K.; Komatsu, Y.;
Usui, T.; Shimatsu, A.; Ogawa, Y.; Hosoda, K.; Akamizu,
T.; Kojima, M.; Kangawa, K.; Nakao, K. J. Clin.
Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 4908.
4. Tschop, M.; Smiley, D. L.; Heiman, M. L. Nature 2000,
407, 908.
5. Nakazato, M.; Murakami, N.; Date, Y.; Kojima, M.;
Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K.; Matsukura, S. Nature 2001,
409, 194.
6. Howard, A. D.; Feighner, S. D.; Cully, D. F.; Arena, J. P.;
Liberator, P. A.; Rosenblum, C. I.; Hamelin, M.; Hreniuk,
D. L.; Palyha, O. C.; Anderson, J.; Paress, P. S.; Diaz, C.;
Chou, M.; Liu, K. K.; McKee, K. K.; Pong, S.-S.;
Chaung, L.-Y. P.; Elbrecht, A.; Dashkevicz, M.; Heavens,
R.; Rigby, M.; Sirinathsinghji, D. J. S.; Dean, D. C.;
Melillo, D. G.; Patchett, A. A.; Nargund, R. P.; Griffin, P.
R.; DeMartino, J. A.; Gupta, S. K.; Schaeffer, J. M.;
Smith, R. G.; Van der Ploeg, L. H. T. Science 1996, 273,
974.
7. Carpino, P. A. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2002, 12, 1599.
8. Patchett, A. A.; Nargund, R. P.; Tata, J. R.; Chen, M.-H.;
Barkat, K. J.; Johnston, D. B. R.; Cheng, K.; Chan, W.
W.-S.; Butler, B.; Hickey, G.; Jacks, T.; Schleim, K.; Pong,
S.-S.; Chaung, L. Y.-P.; Chen, H. Y.; Frazier, E.; Leung,
K. H.; Chiu, S.-H. L.; Smith, R. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1995, 92, 7001.
9. Hansen, T. K.; Ankersen, M.; Hansen, B. S.; Raun, K.;
Nielsen, K. K.; Lau, J.; Peschke, B.; Lundt, B. F.;
Thøgersen, H.; Johansen, N. L.; Madsen, K.; Andersen,
P. H. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3705.
10. Pan, L. C.; Carpino, P. A.; Lefker, B. A.; Ragan, J. A.;
Toler, S. M.; Pettersen, J. C.; Nettleton, D. O.; Ng, O.;
Pirie, C. M.; Chidsey-Frink, K.; Lu, B.; Nickerson, D. F.;
Tess, D. A.; Mullins, M. A.; MacLean, D. B.; DaSilva-
Jardine, P. A.; Thompson, D. D. Endocrine 2001, 14, 121.
11. Nagamine, J.; Nagata, R.; Seki, H.; Nomura-Akimaru,
N.; Ueki, Y.; Kumagai, K.; Taiji, M.; Noguchi, H. J.
Endocrinol. 2001, 171, 481.
In summary, the structure–activity relationships of the
C3-aromatic part of SM-130686 was examined and a
series of 3-dichlorophenyl analogues were identified as
potent ghrelin agonists. Compound 4i, the most potent
compound in the binding assay, showed excellent in vivo
activity and was found to be a ghrelin partial agonist, as
evidenced by the FLIPR assay. Recent accumulating
evidence of the strong orexigenic and adipogenic effects
of ghrelin has raised the possibility that a ghrelin mod-
ulator or antagonist could be used in the treatment of
obesity.17 Owing to the high binding affinity and the
partial agonistic activity of theses oxindole derivatives
25
Vehicle
4i: 2mg/kg
4i: 6mg/kg
4i: 20mg/kg
20
15
10
5
12. Tokunaga, T.; Hume, W. E.; Umezome, T.; Okazaki, K.;
Ueki, Y.; Kumagai, K.; Hourai, S.; Nagamine, J.; Seki,
H.; Taiji, M.; Noguchi, H.; Nagata, R. J. Med. Chem.
2001, 44, 4641.
13. Nagamine, J.; Kawamura, T.; Tokunaga, T.; Hume, W.
E.; Nagata, R.; Nakagawa, T.; Taiji, M. Comb. Chem.
High Throughput Screening, submitted for publication.
14. Hume, W. E.; Tokunaga, T.; Nagata, R. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 3605.
0
0
1
2
3
4
Time (day)
Figure 2. Effect of compound 4i on the body weight gain. Compound
4i was orally administered twice a day for 4 days in normal female rats.
Data are represented as means SD (n = 6). *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01,
Shirley–Williams test (vs vehicle-treatment-group).