circumvent the purification problem,9 but no mention was
made of the recyclability of these species. Here we describe
our own solution to this problem in the form of a minimally
fluorous arylselenium reagent, which, following treatment
of the crude reaction mixtures with sodium metabisulfite, is
recovered almost quantitatively as the diselenide by extrac-
tion with a water-cooled continuous extractor. We anticipate
that the ease of operation of the protocol and the high
recoverability of the reagent by a simple continuous extrac-
tion technique will facilitate the use of this type of chemistry
beyond the academic laboratory.
Table 1. Dehydrogenation of Carbonyl Compounds and
Recovery of the Fluorous Diselenide 2
The areneselenyl halides 1a and 1b were prepared from
the diselenide 2,10,11 by treatment with sulfuryl chloride, and
from the selenocyanate 3,10,11 by exposure to bromine,
respectively, followed by evaporation to dryness. The
chloride (1a) was a red crystalline solid while the bromide
(1b) was obtained in the form of dark red crystals. Both
substances were somewhat hygroscopic, and the bromide was
slowly converted to the diselenide (2) on storage under
vacuum in the ambient laboratory light.
Treatment of the steroidal enone 4 with LDA in THF
followed by the bromide 1b provided the R-arylselenoketone
5, which was not isolated but exposed at room temperature
to hydrogen peroxide. Chromatography of the crude reaction
mixture enabled isolation of the cross-conjugated dienone 6
in 70% yield. The ability of the fluorous arylselenyl groups
to take part in a typical selenation, oxidation, syn-elimination
sequence was therefore established. We next investigated a
protocol, following an early lead by Sharpless,5 in which
the ketone was simply stirred in THF with the chloride 1a
leading directly to the R-arylseleno ketone, presumably by
an acid-catalyzed enolization, followed by oxidation with
hydrogen peroxide and syn-elimination. This second protocol
was found to be operationally simpler, not requiring genera-
tion of the lithium enolate, and gave comparable, even better,
overall yields. It was, therefore, adopted as the standard
protocol.
nicely soluble in halogenated solvents and in perfluorinated
solvents, as noted previously,10,11 such that it may be
conveniently recovered by brief continuous extraction.10-12
The higher oxidation state species (ArSeOH, ArSeO2H)6,7
and their anhydrides6,7 generated in the course of the
oxidation/elimination were found to be much less soluble in
either phase and accumulated at the phase boundary in any
extraction, continuous or classical. Therefore, we turned to
in situ reduction protocols with the aim of recovering the
reagent in the form of the more soluble diselenide. With
isolated samples of the oxidized selenium byproducts we
favored brief treatment with hydrazine hydrate,13 which
wrought clean and complete conversion to the diselenide (2)
in a matter of minutes. However, fears of reaction between
the enone and hydrazine as well as of possible reduction of
the enones by diimide led us to select sodium metabisulfite14
as the in situ reductant. Thus, a protocol was developed in
which the crude reaction mixtures were treated for 1 h at
room temperature with this reagent before being subjected
to an aqueous wash. The organic layer was then partitioned
between FC-7215 and dichloromethane in the continuous
(10) Crich, D.; Hao, X. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 269.
We next turned to recovery of the fluorous selenium
moiety. The minimally fluorous (52% F) diselenide 2 is
(11) Crich, D.; Hao, X.; Lucas, M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14261.
(12) Curran has termed such “minimally” fluorous reagents “light”
fluorous reagents and has presented an alternative protocol for their recovery
involving chromatography over fluorous silica gel: Curran, D. P.; Luo, Z.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9069.
(9) Nicolaou, K. C.; Pastor, J.; Barluenga, S.; Winssinger, N. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 1947.
990
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 7, 2000