Journal of Natural Products
Article
L-Ile was Boc-protected using a previously published protocol.28 The
methylation of NBoc-L-Ile was carried out using Malkov’s method.29
The Boc-protected NMeIle was subjected to acid hydrolysis using the
general peptide hydrolysis scheme as described below, to yield L-N-
methylisoleucine (73.11 mg), which was analyzed by the advanced
Marfey’s method. Although citric acid from the workup was observed
as a minor impurity in the 1H NMR spectrum of L-N-methylisoleucine,
it did not interfere with the advanced Marfey’s analysis. D-N-
Methylisoleucine, L-allo-N-methylisoleucine, and D-allo-N-methyliso-
leucine were synthesized using the same protocol with D-Ile, L-allo-Ile,
and D-allo-Ile as starting compounds. All were analyzed using the
advanced Marfey’s method as described for the peptide hydrolysate. L-
N-Methylisoleucine: [α]2D2 +17.6 (c 0.39, MeOH); 1H NMR data
(DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 3.84 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz), 2.59 (3H, s), 1.95
(1H, m), 1.50 (1H, m), 1.32 (1H, m), 0.91 (3H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 0.90
(3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); DEPTQ data (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 169.5, 64.6,
35.3, 32.5, 26.4, 14.5, 12.0. NMR spectra of D-Ile, L-allo-Ile, and D-allo-
Ile can be found in Supporting Information S24.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Supplementary data (morphological and phylogenetic analysis
■
S
1
of Trichormus sp. UIC 10339; H NMR, DEPTQ, COSY,
TOCSY, HSQC, HMBC, and ROESY spectra of 1 and 2;
Marfey’s and advanced Marfey’s analysis of 1 and 2; MS/MS
spectra of 1 and 2) associated with this article are available free
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*Tel: +1-312-996-5583. Fax: +1-312-996-7107. E-mail: orjala@
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Synthesis of (2S,3R)-3-Hydroxyleucine and (2S,3S)-3-Hy-
droxyleucine. These compounds were synthesized using the
procedures by Bonnard et al.16 We obtained 148.0 mg of major
precursor (R)-1-((2S,5R)-5-isopropyl-3,6-dimethoxy-2,5-dihydropyra-
zin-2-yl)-2-methylpropan-1-ol and 54.5 mg of minor precursor (S)-1-
((2S,5R)-5-isopropyl-3,6-dimethoxy-2,5-dihydropyrazin-2-yl)-2-meth-
ylpropan-1-ol. The hydroxyleucine precursors were hydrolyzed
following the general peptide acid hydrolysis process as described
below. The major precursor gave a mixture of (2S,3R)-3-
hydroxyleucine and D-valine, and the minor precursor gave a mixture
of (2S,3S)-3-hydroxyleucine and D-valine. These two mixtures were
derivatized with L-FDLA and D-FDLA, respectively, and the resulting
four derivatization mixtures were analyzed using the general LC-MS
method as described for peptide hydrolysate analysis. 1H NMR data of
major precursor (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 4.08 (1H, dd, J = 3.2 Hz, 2.9
Hz), 3.98 (1H, dd, J = 3.6 Hz, 3.4 Hz), 3.71 (3H, s), 3.67 (3H, s), 3.61
(1H, br), 2.24 (1H, m), 1.99, (1H, m), 1.69 (1H, br), 1.03 (3H, d, J =
6.9 Hz), 1.02 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.97 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.70 (3H,
d, J = 6.9 Hz). 1H NMR data of minor precursor (CDCl3, 300 MHz):
δ 4.17 (1H, dd, J = 4.3 Hz, 4.0 Hz), 3.98 (1H, dd, J = 3.7 Hz, 3.6 Hz),
3.71 (3H, s), 3.70 (3H, s), 3.65 (1H, br), 2.27 (1H, m), 1.82, (1H, m),
1.68 (1H, br), 1.04 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.90 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.89
(3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.69 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This research was supported by grant PO1 CA125066 from
NCI/NIH. The 900 MHz NMR spectrometer was purchased
by NIH grant GM068944 to Dr. Peter G. W. Gettins. We thank
Dr. B. E. Ramirez for providing access to NMR spectrometers
at the UIC Center for Structural Biology (CSB). We thank Dr.
G. E. Chlipala for assisting in the taxonomic identification and
phylogenetic analysis. We thank Dr. D. Nikolic and R. Davis for
their aid in qTOF instrument operating. We thank Dr. G. R.
Thacher and R. Xiong for assisting with NMeIle synthesis.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Raaijmakers, J. M.; de Bruijn, I.; Nybroe, O.; Ongena, M. FEMS
Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 34, 1037−1062.
(2) Wrasidlo, W.; Mielgo, A.; Torres, V. A.; Barbero, S.; Stoletov, K.;
Suyama, T. L.; Klemke, R. L.; Gerwick, W. H.; Carson, D. A.; Stupack,
D. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 2313−2318.
(3) Vilhena, C.; Bettencourt, A. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 202−
209.
(4) Cameotra, S. S.; Makkar, R. S. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7,
262−266.
Acid Hydrolysis of Trichormamides A (1) and B (2).
Approximately 0.3 mg of 1 and 2 was hydrolyzed with 1 mL of 6 N
HCl for 20 h at 110 °C in separate Teflon-sealed Ace pressure tubes.
The cooled hydrolysate mixtures were evaporated to dryness, and
traces of HCl were removed from the reaction mixtures by repeated
evaporation.
(5) Bidwai, A. P.; Takemoto, J. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987,
84, 6755−6759.
(6) Digiorgio, D.; Camoni, L.; Ballio, A. Physiol. Plant. 1994, 91,
741−746.
(7) Baltz, R. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 144−151.
(8) Sieber, S. A.; Marahiel, M. A. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 715−738.
(9) Pirri, G.; Giuliani, A.; Nicoletto, S. F.; Pizzuto, L.; Rinaldi, A. C.
Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2009, 4, 258−273.
Absolute Configurations of Amino Acids by the Advanced
Marfey’s Analysis. L- and D-FDLA (1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-
leucinamide) were purchased from TCI America. Each acid hydro-
lysate (approximately 0.3 mg) was separated into two equal portions
for derivatization with either L-FDLA or D-FDLA. Each portion was
dissolved in 110 μL of acetone and 50 μL of H2O, followed by mixing
with 20 μL of 1 N NaHCO3. Finally, 20 μL of L-FDLA or D-FDLA (10
mg/mL in acetone) was added, and the mixtures were heated to 40 °C
for 1 h. The reaction mixtures were then cooled to room temperature,
and 20 μL of 1 N HCl was added to quench the reaction. The cooled
reaction mixtures were evaporated to dryness and redissolved in 300
μL of CH3CN. LC-MS analysis was carried out using a reversed-phase
column (Phenomenex Kinetex C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 1.0 mL/min)
with a linear gradient from 25% to 65% aqueous CH3CN containing
0.1% formic acid over 50 min. The selective ion chromatograms of L-
FDLA and D-FDLA derivatives of each amino acid were compared for
the assignment of amino acid configurations. Detailed reports of
retention times of each amino acid can be found in Supporting
Information S14 and S23.
(10) Mehner, C.; Muller, D.; Krick, A.; Kehraus, S.; Loser, R.;
Guetschow, M.; Maier, A.; Fiebig, H. H.; Brun, R.; Konig, G. M. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 1732−1739.
(11) Kang, H. S.; Krunic, A.; Shen, Q.; Swanson, S. M.; Orjala, J. J.
Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1597−1605.
(12) Kang, H. S.; Sturdy, M.; Krunic, A.; Kim, H.; Shen, Q.; Swanson,
S. M.; Orjala, J. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 6134−6143.
(13) Krunic, A.; Vallat, A.; Mo, S. Y.; Lantvit, D. D.; Swanson, S. M.;
Orjala, J. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1927−1932.
(14) Gerwick, W. H.; Jiang, Z. D.; Agarwal, S. K.; Farmer, B. T.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2313−2324.
(15) MacMillan, J. B.; Ernst-Russell, M. A.; de Ropp, J. S.; Molinski,
T. F. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8210−8215.
(16) Bonnard, I.; Rolland, M.; Salmon, J. M.; Debiton, E.;
Barthomeuf, C.; Banaigs, B. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1266−1279.
(17) Maru, N.; Ohno, O.; Uemura, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51,
6384−6387.
(18) Leao, P. N.; Pereira, A. R.; Liu, W. T.; Ng, J.; Pevzner, P. A.;
Dorrestein, P. C.; Konig, G. M.; Vasconcelosa, V. M.; Gerwick, W. H.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 11183−11188.
Antiproliferative Assay. Cytotoxicity assays against the MDA-
MB-435 and HT-29 cancer cell lines were conducted according to
established protocols.34
1879
dx.doi.org/10.1021/np5003548 | J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1871−1880