Job/Unit: O50361
/KAP1
Date: 28-04-15 16:03:47
Pages: 5
Mild Oxidative Cleavage of 9-BBN-Protected Amino Acids
General Procedure for Deprotection: The 9-BBN-protected amino
acid (1 mmol) was vigorously stirred in acetonitrile (12 mL) at
room temperature. Na2HPO4 (3 mmol, 426 mg) was added to this
solution followed by the dropwise addition of trifluoroperacetic
acid (6 mL, 0.5 m in acetonitrile).[13] The reaction mixture was
stirred until the starting material was consumed, as judged by TLC
and/or LC/MS, then quenched by the addition of a 20% solution
of Na2SO3 in water (1 mL). The solvent was removed on a rotary
evaporator, the residue was redissolved in dioxane (15 mL) and
water (5 mL), treated with solid NaHCO3 (5 mmol, 420 mg) and
cooled to 0 °C. Fmoc-OSu (1.2 mmol, 405 mg) was added in one
portion and the reaction was stirred at water-ice bath temperature
for 30 min, brought to room temperature and stirred until full con-
version of the amino acid had been obtained. The volatiles were
removed, additional water was added (20 mL) and the pH was ad-
justed to 3 with 1 m KHSO4. The water phase was extracted with
dichloromethane (4ϫ 15 mL), the pooled organic extracts were
dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated. The crude material was puri-
fied with flash chromatography using a dichloromethane/methanol/
formic acid (0.1%) gradient starting with 1% and ending with 10%
methanol.
tected glutamine 4a to 4b (entry 4). This further underlines
the high degree of orthogonality of our procedure with
highly acid sensitive protective groups. Finally, 9-BBN-pro-
tected galactosylated hydroxylysine 5a (entry 5) was cleanly
converted into the corresponding Fmoc-protected amino
acid 5b in 94% yield on a 1.5 mmol scale. It should be em-
phasized that this constitutes a vast improvement over our
earlier large-scale attempts that gave 5b in a mediocre 38%
yield.
Table 2. Isolated yields obtained in oxidative cleavage of 9-BBN
derivatives 1a–5a, followed by protection to give the corresponding
Fmoc-amino acids 1b–5b.
Fmoc-protected amino acids 1b–5b obtained as products showed
spectroscopic data in accordance with published data. Copies of 1H
and 13C NMR spectroscopic data are provided in the Supporting
Information.
Acknowledgments
This project is financially supported by the Swedish Foundation
for Strategic Research. The authors thank AstraZeneca R&D,
Mölndal, Sweden for contributing equipment that allowed this pro-
ject to be performed successfully.
[1] a) P. G. M. Wuts, T. W. Greene, Greene’s protective groups in
organic Synthesis John Wiley & Sons, 2006; b) Philip J. Kocien-
ski, Protecting groups, Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 2005.
[2] a) W. H. Dent, W. R. Erickson, S. C. Fields, M. H. Parker,
E. G. Tromiczak, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1249–1251; b) A. Vazquez,
A. Sánchez, E. Calderón, Synthesis 2013, 45, 1364–1372; c)
G. H. L. Nefkens, B. Zwanenburg, Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 2995–
2998.
[a] All reactions were performed on a 1 mmol scale unless otherwise
[b]
[c]
stated.
Performed on 8 mmol scale (2.96 g).
Performed on
1.5 mmol scale (1.12 g).
[3] a) H. Taskent-Sezgin, J. Chung, P. S. Banerjee, S. Nagarajan,
R. B. Dyer, I. Carrico, D. P. Raleigh, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 7473–7475; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 7635; b) R.
Merkx, G. de Bruin, A. Kruithof, T. van den Bergh, E. Snip,
M. Lutz, F. El Oualid, H. Ovaa, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 4494–
4498; c) L. Peura, K. Malmioja, K. Huttunen, J. Leppänen,
M. Hämäläinen, M. M. Forsberg, J. Rautio, K. Laine, Pharm.
Res. 2013, 30, 2523–2537; d) Z. Zhang, H. Yang, C. Zhang,
J. C. Lewis, Organometallics 2012, 31, 7328–7331; e) L. Lou,
G. Qian, Y. Xie, J. Hang, H. Chen, K. Zaleta-Rivera, Y. Li, Y.
Shen, P. H. Dussault, F. Liu, L. Du, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 643–645; f) F. El Oualid, R. Merkx, R. Ekkebus, D. S.
Hameed, J. J. Smit, A. de Jong, H. Hilkmann, T. K. Sixma, H.
Ovaa, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 10149–10153; Angew.
Chem. 2010, 122, 10347; g) D. A. Mitchell, S. U. Morton,
M. A. Marletta, ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 659–665.
[4] a) S. D. Van Arnum, H. J. Niemczyk, Macromolecules 2009, 42,
908–912; b) T. M. Woods, G. J. Cooper, M. A. Brimble, Amino
Acids 2013, 45, 319–325; c) D. Schade, K. Töpker-Lehmann, J.
Kotthaus, B. Clement, J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1025–1030.
[5] a) W. H. Walker, S. E. Rokita, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1563–
1566; b) B. M. Syed, T. Gustafsson, J. Kihlberg, Tetrahedron
2004, 60, 5571–5575.
Conclusions
We have developed a fast and reliable method to selec-
tively deprotect 9-BBN-protected amino acid derivatives by
oxidation with trifluoroperoxy acetic acid (TFPAA). De-
protection is performed under very mild conditions, is com-
patible with sensitive structural motifs such as glycosidic
linkages, and shows orthogonality with acid labile protect-
ing groups such as N-Boc, O-tert butyl esters and even tri-
tyl-protected amides. This work thus provides the organic
chemistry community with a method that significantly ex-
pands the scope for use of the versatile 9-BBN protecting
group. The mechanism of the oxidative deprotection is un-
der further investigation.
Experimental Section
General: Details regarding synthesis of the 9-BBN-protected amino
acids 1a–5a and complete characterization of these compounds are
provided in the supporting information.
[6] a) A. Y. Shaikh, S. Das, D. Pati, V. Dhaware, S. Sen Gupta, S.
Hotha, Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 3679–3686; b) T. Koop-
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
3