Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: i, 29 (1.5 equiv.), NIS–TfOH, CH2Cl2,
4 Å molecular sieves, 260 °C, 2 h, 70%; ii, DDQ (2.5 equiv.), CH2Cl2–
H2O, 3 h, quant.; iii, SO3·pyridine complex (5 equiv.), DMF, 0 °C, 3 h, 95%;
iv, LiI (40 equiv.), pyridine, 110 °C, overnight, 90%; v, hydrazine hydrate–
MeOH (1+4), 80 °C, 6 h; vi, MeOH–CH2Cl2 (1+1), Ac2O, 0 °C, 1 h; Na+
resin.
Glycosylation of 29 with diol 24 (NIS–TfOH, 260 °C) gave
the expected hexasaccharide 30 in 70% yield (Scheme 4).
Removal of the NAP group in the b-galactopyranosyl residue
by DDQ in CH2Cl2–H2O afforded 31, which was further treated
with 5 equiv. of sulfur trioxide–pyridine complex in DMF at
0 °C to give the sulfated compound 32. Finally, 32 was
converted to the target compound 2 in three successive steps: (i)
LiI–pyridine at 110 °C (methyl ester to free acid); (ii) 4+1
MeOH–hydrazine hydrate at 80 °C (removal of the phthalimido
and acetyl groups); (iii) 5+5+3 MeOH–CH2Cl2–Ac2O (N-
acetylation). The structure of 2 was confirmed by 1H, 13C NMR
and FAB mass spectroscopy.†
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, 2-(bromomethyl)naphthalene, KOH,
18-crown-6, THF, 2 h; ii, 80% AcOH, 75 °C, 95%; iii, pyridine–Ac2O,
DMAP; iv, hydrazine acetate, DMF, 2 h, 87%; v, CCl3CN–DBU, CH2Cl2,
210 °C, 90%; vi, 19 (1.5 equiv.), TESOTf, 4 Å molecular sieves, CH2Cl2,
room temp., 73%; vii, MeOH–Et3N–H2O, 4 °C; viii, 4 (2.0 equiv.), NIS–
TfOH, 3 Å molecular sieves, CH3CN–CH2Cl2, 230 °C, 3 h, 78%; ix, 50%
AcOH, 55 °C, 4 h, 90%.
We thank the National Cancer Institute for financial support
(Grant No. CA 63218) of this work.
Notes and references
† Selected data for 2: m/z (FAB) 1441.4 (M); [a]2D0 +3.1 (c 0.16, H2O);
dH(D2O, 400 MHz) 5.12 (d, 1H, J 3.6, H-1BB), 4.99 (d, 1H, J 3.6, H-1), 4.56
(d, 1H, J 8.4, H-1B), 4.55 (d, 1H, J 8.4, H-1Ú), 4.46 (d, 1H, J 8.0, H-1A), 4.09
(dd, 1H, J 3.3, 9.9, H-3A), 2.76 (dd, 1H, J 4.8, 12.2, H-3ÚBe), 2.07, 2.04, 2.00
and 1.97 (each s, 12H, 4 3 NHAc), 1.80 (t, J 12.0, H-3ÚBa), 1.28 (d, 3H, J
7.2, CMe); dC(D2O, 100.6 MHz) 105.21 (C-1B), 102.30 (C-1Ú), 101.81 (C-
1A), 101.00 (C-2ÚB), 99.56 (C-1BB), 97.13 (C-1), 76.60 (C-3A), 71.47 (C-6),
70.36 (CH2Ph), 68.73 (C-6A), 63.65 (C-6Ú), 62.52 (C-6B), 61.15 (C-9ÚB),
40.73 (C-3ÚB), 23.46, 23.31, 23.15, 23.06 (4 3 NHAc), 16.46 (C-6BB).
1 R. K. Jain, C. F. Piskorz, B.-G. Huang, R. D. Locke, H.-L. Han, A.
Koenig, A. Varki and K. L. Matta, Glycobiology, 1998, 8, 707.
2 Y. Imai, L. A. Lasky and S. D. Rosen, Nature, 1993, 361, 555.
3 C. Capon, C. L. Laboisse, J. M. Wieruszeski, J. J. Maoret, C. Augeron
and B. Fournet, J. Biol. Chem., 1992, 267, 19248; D. L. Chance and T.
P. Mawhinney, Carbohydr. Res., 1996, 295, 157.
4 M. J. Gaunt, J. Yu and J. B. Spencer, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4172; M. J.
Gaunt, C. E. Boschetti, J. Yu and J. B. Spencer, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999,
40, 1803.
5 J. Xia, S. A. Abbas, R. D. Locke, C. F. Piskorz, J. L. Alderfer and K. L.
Matta, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 169.
6 R. R. Schmidt and A. Toepfer, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 3353.
7 M. D. Burkart, Z. Zhang, S.-C. Hung and C.-H. Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1997, 119, 11743.
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, 5 (1.2 equiv.), NIS–TfOH, CH2Cl2,
4 Å molecular sieves, 265 °C; ii, pyridine–Ac2O, DMAP; iii, 7 (3.0 equiv.),
Selectfluor, BF3·Et2O, 3 Å molecular sieves, CH3CN, 0 °C, 75%; iv, 10%
Pd/C, HOAc–MeOH; v, Ac2O–HOAc–H2SO4, 70%; vi, PhSH, BF3·Et2O,
CH2Cl2, 73%.
with Ac2O–HOAc–H2SO4 provided the fully acetylated tri-
saccharide 28. Treatment of 28 with PhSH–BF3·Et2O furnished
GalNAc Lex glycosyl donor 29 in 73% yield.
Communication a908511d
370
Chem. Commun., 2000, 369–370