1298
S.-W. Lin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1297±1298
In summary, we have discovered a new, potent, low
molecular weight, non-triketone type HPPD inhibitor.
This study revealed that 3-cyclopropane-carbonyloxy-2-
cyclohexen-1-one has potent HPPD inhibition activity,
comparable to that of NTBC. The preliminary SAR
studies demonstrated that the well-positioned dicar-
bonyl groups of 2d are essential for this potent inhibi-
tion. Thus, 3-cyclopropanecarbonyloxy-2-cyclohexen-1-
one or its derivatives has the potential to serve as a new
therapeutic agent to treat the fatal human disease tyr-
osinemia type I. Further SAR studies are currently
underway in our laboratory.
Scheme 1. Preparation of compounds 2a±g.
Table 1. Inhibition constants for reactions of 2a±g with HPPD from
pig liver by the enol borate assay method
Acknowledgements
Compound
R
IC50
(mM)a
Compound
R
IC50
(mM)a
Financial support of this research from the National
Science Council of the Republic of China is gratefully
acknowledged.
2a
2b
2c
2d
CH3
C2H5
CH(CH3)2
CH(CH2)2
3.62
0.11
4.16
0.03
2e
2f
2g
C(CH3)3
CH(CH2)5
C6H5
79.60
3.70
1.58
References and Notes
aMean of two determinations.
1. Lindstedt, S.; Holme, E.; Lock, E.; Hialmarson, O.;
Strandvik, B. Lancet 1992, 340, 813.
2. Landrigan, P. J. Am. J. Public Health 1992, 82, 941.
3. Puntoni, R.; Merlo, F.; Fini, A.; Meazza, L.; Santi, L.
Lancet 1986, ii, 525.
4. Ellis, M. K.; Whit®eld, A. C.; Gowans, L. A.; Auton, T. R.;
Provan, W. M.; Lock, E. A.; Smith, L. L. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 1995, 133, 12.
5. (a) Scheparts, B.; Gurin, S. J. Biol. Chem. 1949, 180, 663.
(b) Vitol, M. J.; Vilks, S. R.; Zabaroversuska, I. M.; Maurinia,
K. A. Kokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 1970, 192, 908.
6. Bender, D. A. In Amino Acid Metabolism, 2nd ed.; John
Wiley & Sons: London, 1985; p 212.
7. Lin, S.-W.; Yang, D.-Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9,
551.
8. Nippon Soda Co., Ltd. Japanese Patent 8,204,965, 1982;
Chem. Abstr. 1982, 96, 199168w.
9. Buckthal, D. J.; Roche, P. A.; Moorehead, T. J.; Forbes, B.
J. R.; Hamilton, G. A. Methods in Enzymol. 1987, 142, 132.
10. Lindstedt, S.; Rundgren, M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1982,
704, 66.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compounds 4 and 6: (a) p-TsOH, benzene,
re¯ux; (b) Et3N, trimethylsilyl chloride, DMF, 120 ꢀC; (c) potassium t-
butoxide, cyclopropane carbonyl chloride, THF, 20 ꢀC.
was prepared in one step by acid catalyzed dehydration
of cyclohexanedione and cyclopropanemethanol 3.
Compound 6 was synthesized in two steps by ®rst con-
verting the cyclohexanone to the corresponding tri-
methylsilyl enol ether 5,12 followed by treatment with
cyclopropane carbonyl chloride in the presence of
potassium t-butoxide in THF.13
11. The reaction mixtures contained 0.85 mL potassium phos-
phate/borate buer (prepared by adjusting the pH of 0.42 M
H3BO3 to 6.2 with a 0.17 M Na3PO4 solution), 0.06 mL 4-
hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid (1.8 mM, in 0.2 M Na3PO4 buer),
0.03 mL dichlorophenolindophenol (reduced form, prepared
by mixing 1 mL of 3.3 mM sodium dichlorophenolindophenol
in H2O and 0.16 M glutathione in 0.2 M sodium phosphate
buer), and 0.01 mL phenylpyruvate tautomerase (10U/mL,
Sigma). The above solution was equilibrated for 15 min, the
inhibition reaction of 2a±g, 4 and 6 with the enzyme HPPD
was evaluated by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 308
nm over a 15 min period following coadministration of vary-
ing concentrations of the inhibitors and HPPD.
12. Suginome, H.; Kondoh, T.; Gogonea, C.; Singh, V.; Goto,
H.; Osawa, E. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 69.
13. Duhamel, P.; Cahard, D.; Poirier, J.-M. J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 2509.
14. Prisbylla, M. P. B.; Onisko, B. C.; Shribbs, J. M.; Adams,
D. O.; Liu, Y.; Ellis, M. K.; Hawkes, T. R.; Mutter, L. C.
Proc. British Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 1993, 2, 731.
The inhibition results showed that analogue 6 was a
much less potent inhibitor than 2d with IC50 of 0.7 mM
and analogue 4 was not a HPPD inhibitor. When the
ring carbonyl group of 2d was removed to form 6, the
inhibition potency decreased 23-fold relative to 2d indi-
cating that this carbonyl group is essential for binding.
When the ester carbonyl group of 2d was removed to
form 4, no enzyme inhibition was observed up to the
concentration of 0.2 mM. This result implies the car-
bonyl oxygen atom on the ester functionality is crucial
for inhibition, presumably by chelating with ferrous ion
in the enzyme active site.14