3774 Organometallics, Vol. 19, No. 19, 2000
Kukral et al.
and Varian (MAT-711) instruments. Elemental analyses were
determined in the microanalytical laboratory of the University
of Ulm.
excess of 1,2-dibromoethane yielded 1a as a beige solid. A
solution of 1a in 80 mL of Et2O was added at room temperature
to the separately prepared lithium salt of 2-phenylindene 2c
(5.5 g, 28.9 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight
and refluxed for 2 h. The crude product was treated with a
saturated aqueous solution of NH4Cl and washed several times
with water. The organic phase was separated and dried over
Na2SO4. Evaporation of the solvent and recrystallization from
n-hexane yielded 3c as a white solid (7.7 g, 20.2 mmol, 69%).
3c: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.2-2.65 (m, 4H, CH2
bridge), 3.7 (s, 2H, CH2 indene), 4.2 (t, 1H, CH 9-H-fluorene),
6.8-7.9 (m, 18H, indene olefinic, aromatic protons indene
system, aromatic fluorene); MS (FD) m/z 384 (M+, 100%). Anal.
Calcd C, 93.71; H, 6.29. Found: C, 93.53; H, 6.37.
1-d -P r op en e. A mixture of cis/ trans-1-bromo-1-propene (72
g, 0.6 mol) was added to freshly cut lithium (12.5 g, 1.8 mol)
in 300 mL of ether at 0 °C. After stirring overnight, the
mixture was filtered and the filtrate evaporated to dryness.
The resulting white solid lithium compounds were suspended
in 200 mL of toluene. At 0 °C methanol-d1 (24 g, 0.73 mol)
was added, and the evolving gas was condensed through a cold
trap at -50 °C into a steel vessel at -196 °C. The gas was
further purified by passing it through molecular sieves and
bubbling it through triisobutylaluminum, resulting in a yield
1
of 20.5 g of 1-d-propene (80%). The H NMR spectrum (CDCl3
P r ep a r a tion of 1-(9-F lu or en yl)-1-(5,6-cyclop en ta -2-m e-
th ylin d en yl)d im eth ylsila n e (3d ). A portion of 5 g (30.1
mmol) of fluorene was diluted in 100 mL of Et2O and cooled
to -78 °C. Addition of a 1.6 M solution of n-BuLi in hexane
(18.8 mL, 30.1 mmol) and stirring for an additional 2 h resulted
in the formation of fluorenyllithium. Subsequent cooling to -78
°C and further treatment with an excess of dimethyldichlo-
rosilane (14.6 mL, 120 mmol) afforded the substituted fluore-
nyl compound 1b. The remaining mixture was allowed to
attain room temperature and stirred for an additional 2 h.
Removal of the solvent and excess of dimethyldichlorosilane
in vacuo gave 1b as a beige powder. This solution was added
after dilution with 100 mL of Et2O at ambient temperature to
the separately prepared lithium salt of the 5,6-cyclopenta-2-
methylindene 2a (5.1 g, 30.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was
stirred overnight and refluxed for 2 h. The crude product was
treated with a saturated aqueous solution of NH4Cl and
washed several times with water. The organic phase was
separated and dried over Na2SO4. Evaporation of the solvent
and recrystallization from n-hexane yielded 3d as a white solid
(8.9 g, 22.7 mmol, 75%).
3d : 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ -0.46, -0.51 (2 s, 6H, CH3
bridge), 2.01 (m, 2H, CH2 five-membered aliphatic ring), 2.11
(s, 3H, CH3) 2.83 (pseudo-q, 4H, CH2 five-membered aliphatic
ring), 3.58 (s, 1H, CH indene), 4.18 (s, 1H, CH 9-H-fluorene),
6.5 (s, 1H, indene olefinic), 7.08-7.87 (m, 10H, aromatic
protons indene system, aromatic fluorene); MS (FD) m/z 392
(M+, 100%). Anal. Calcd C, 85.66; H, 7.19. Found: C, 85.69;
H, 7.14.
P r ep a r a tion of 1-(9-F lu or en yl)-1-(2-m eth ylin d en yl)-
d im eth ylsila n e (3e). Following the procedure described for
3d , fluorene (4.5 g, 27.2 mmol), dimethyldichlorosilane (13.5
mL, 114 mmol), and 2-methylindene 2b (3.5 g, 27.2 mmol) gave
3e as a white solid (7.1 g, 20.1 mmol, 74%).
3e: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ -0.49, 0.53 (2 s, 6H, CH3
bridge), 2.11 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.65 (s, 1H, CH indene), 4.15 (s,
1H, CH 9-H-fluorene), 6.54 (s, 1H, indene olefinic), 6.92-7.89
(m, 10H, aromatic protons indene system, aromatic fluorene);
MS (FD) m/z 352 (M+, 100%). Anal. Calcd C, 85.17; H, 6.86.
Found: C, 85.45; H, 6.82.
P r ep a r a tion of 1-(9-F lu or en yl)-1-(2-p h en ylin d en yl)-
d im eth ylsila n e (3f). Following the procedure described for
3d , fluorene (4.3 g, 26.0 mmol), dimethyldichlorosilane (12.5
mL, 104 mmol), and 2-phenylindene 2c (5.0 g, 26.0 mmol) gave
3f as a white solid (8.4 g, 20.2 mmol, 78%).
3f: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ -0.89, -0.61 (2 s, 6H, CH3
bridge), 3.97 (s, 1H, CH indene), 4.30 (s, 1H, CH 9-H-fluorene),
6.95-7.86 (m, 18H, indene olefinic, aromatic protons indene
system, aromatic fluorene); MS (FD) m/z 414 (M+, 100%). Anal.
Calcd C, 86.91; H, 6.32. Found: C, 86.62; H, 6.32.
P r ep a r a tion of r a c-[1-(9-η5-F lu or en yl)-2-(2-p h en yl-1-η5-
in d en yl)eth a n e]zir con iu m Dich lor id e (4c). A 1.5 g portion
(4.9 mmol) of 1-(9-fluorenyl)-2-(2-phenylindenyl)ethane, 3c,
was diluted in 60 mL of Et2O and cooled to -78 °C. After
treatment of the ligand precursor with 4.9 mL of n-BuLi at
-78 °C the reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature
and stirred for 2 h. Subsequently, the solvent was removed in
(δ ) 7.24 ppm), 500 MHz) showed that the product contained
41% of cis-1-d-propene HDCdCHCH3 (dq, δ ) 4.91 ppm, 3J )
4
10 Hz, J ) 1.5 Hz, 1H) and 59% of trans-1-d-propene (dq, δ
3
4
) 5.00 ppm, J ) 17 Hz, J ) 1.8 Hz, 1H).
P olym er iza tion Rea ction s w ith 1-d -P r op en e. Polymer-
izations with deuterated propene were performed in a 50 mL
steel autoclave. The solvent toluene, cocatalyst MAO, and the
catalyst were fed under argon and allowed to reach the desired
polymerization temperature. After a 10 min contact time
monomer was added and temperature ((1 °C) and pressure
((100 mbar) were kept constant. The polymerization was
stopped by pouring the reaction mixture into acidified metha-
nol. The polymer product was washed with a methanol/HCl
solution and with methanol. The product was filtered and dried
in vacuo at 60 °C overnight. The yields of deuterated polypro-
pene were between 0.2 and 0.8 g.
P r op en e P olym er iza tion Rea ction s. The polymerization
reactions were performed in a 1 L Bu¨chi steel reactor at
constant pressure and temperature. The autoclave was charged
with 300 mL of toluene and with the desired amount of MAO.
Subsequently, the polymerization temperature was adjusted,
the reactor was charged with propene up to the desired partial
pressure, and the preactivated catalyst solution (Al:Zr ) 100:
1) was injected into the autoclave via a pressure buret. The
monomer consumption was measured by the use of a calibrated
gas flow meter (Bronkhorst F-111C-HA-33P), and the pressure
was kept constant during the entire polymerization period
(Bronkhorst pressure controller P-602C-EA-33P). Pressure,
temperature, and consumption of propene were monitored and
recorded online. The polymerization reactions were stopped
and treated as described above.
P olym er An a lysis. 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a
Varian GEMINI 2000 spectrometer (C2D2Cl4, 100 °C, 75 MHz,
10 mm probe) or on a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer (C2D2-
Cl4, 80 °C, 125 MHz, 5 mm probe) in the inverse gated
decoupling mode with a 3 s pulse delay and a 45° pulse to
attain conditions close to the maximum signal-to-noise ratio.
The number of transients accumulated was between 5 and 15
K. The spectra were analyzed by known methods.32 Molecular
weights and molecular weight distributions were determined
by gel permeation chromatography (GPC, Waters 150 C ALC,
140 °C in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene) relative to polystyrene and
polypropene standards.
P r ep a r a tion of 1-(9-F lu or en yl)-2-(2-p h en ylin d en yl)-
eth a n e (3c). A portion of 4.8 g (28.9 mmol) of fluorene was
diluted in 100 mL of Et2O and cooled to -78 °C. Addition of a
1.6 M solution of n-BuLi in hexane (18.1 mL, 28.9 mmol) and
stirring for an additional 2 h afforded the formation of
fluorenyllithium. Subsequent cooling to -78 °C and further
treatment with an excess of 1,2-dibromoethane (14.9 mL, 173
mmol) formed the substituted fluorenyl compound 1a . The
remaining mixture was allowed to attain room temperature
and stirred for an additional 2 h. Removal of the solvent and
(31) Chang, Y. H.; Ford, W. T. J . Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3758
(32) Busico, V.; Cipullo, R.; Corradini, P.; Landriani, L.; Vacatello,
M.; Segre, A. L. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 1887