D-glycerldehyde acetonide.9 Many of these syntheses derive
their asymmetry from carbohydrate derivatives,5-9 diethyl
L-tartrate,10 or a substituted benzaldehyde chromium(0)
complex.11
Scheme 2
Our approach to this class of natural products involves
the diastereoselective synthesis of either double bond isomer
of compound 2, from furyl alcohol 3, and subsequent
conversion to 1a-d through a diastereoselective epoxidation
and acid-catalyzed cyclization sequence (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Recently, we developed an expeditious route to various
D- or L-sugars and sugar lactones from furan diols using
Sharpless’s dihydroxylation to establish the absolute stereo-
chemistry.12 Continuing our investigations on the utility of
this strategy, we turned our attention to the styryllactone class
of natural products, especially the R,â-unsaturated δ-lactone
motif. Herein, we describe our preliminary results in the
synthesis of the altholactone diastereomers. This work led
to a highly efficient enantioselective approach to 3 styryl-
lactones: isoaltholactone (1c), 3-epi-altholactone (1a), and
5-hydroxy goniothalamin (14).
We envisioned synthesizing 2a and 2b from 4, which we
previously prepared enantioselectively from furyl alcohol 3
(Scheme 2).13 Furyl alcohol 3 was synthesized from furfural
via a Peterson olefination, dihydroxylation of the resulting
vinylfuran using AD-mix-â,14 and protection of the primary
alcohol with TBSCl, in a 75% overall yield and >92% ee.15
Treatment of furyl alcohol 3 with NBS16 in aqueous THF
produces a hemiacetal pyranone through an oxidative ring
expansion (Achmatowicz reaction).17 Treatment of the crude
Achmatowicz product with excess Jones reagent gave a
ketolactone intermediate, which was taken on without
purification to a Luche reduction with NaBH4 and CeCl3 in
MeOH, to give δ-lactone 418 in 70% yield and >92% ee.
To gain access to a suitably protected aldehyde precursor
necessary to install the olefin side chain, some protecting
group manipulations were required (Scheme 2). Initial
attempts included the use of a benzoyl or ethyl carbonate
protecting group at C-4 (lactones 5a and 5b); however, C-4
carboxylate groups were incompatible with the ensuing
oxidation step. The primary TBS groups of 5a and 5b were
cleanly deprotected with 5% HF in CH3CN to give primary
alcohols 6a and 6b. Unfortunately, oxidation of either alcohol
6a or 6b under various conditions (Jones, PCC, TPAP, and
Dess-Martin) failed to give the desired aldehydes 7a and
7b; only the elimination product 8 was formed.
A practical solution was found by using a bis-TBS group
protection strategy (Scheme 2). Protection of the free hydroxy
group of lactone 4 was accomplished with TBSOTf forming
5c in 90% yield. Selective deprotection of the primary TBS
group of 5c was accomplished with 5% HF in CH3CN to
exclusively give the free primary alcohol 6c in 90% yield.
Dess-Martin oxidation of the primary alcohol gave the
desired aldehyde 7c, which was taken on without purification
due to decomposition on silica gel. Although aldehyde 7c
was unstable, Wittig olefination of crude 7c gave δ-lactone
2a in a 60% yield and a diastereoselectivity of 7:1 in favor
of the cis olefin at -78 °C (Scheme 3).19
(6) (a) Gillhouley, J. G.; Shing, T. K. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1988, 976-977. (b) Shing, T. K. M.; Gillhouley, J. G. Tetrahedron 1994,
50, 8685-8698. (c) Shing, T. K. M.; Tsui, H.-C.; Zhou, Z.-H. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 3121-3130.
(7) Ueno, Y.; Tadano, K.; Ogawa, S.; McLaughlin, J. L.; Alkofahi, A.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 2328-2337.
(8) Kang, S. H.; Kim, W. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5915-5918.
(9) (a) Tsubuki, M.; Kanai, K.; Honda, T. Synlett 1993, 653-655. (b)
Tsubuki, M.; Kanai, K.; Nagase, H.; Honda, T. Tetrahedron 1999, 55,
2493-2514.
(10) Somfai, P. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11315-11320.
(11) (a) Mukai, C.; Hirai, S.; Kim, I. J.; Hanaoka, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 5389-5392. (b) Mukai, C.; Hirai, S.; Hanaoka, M. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 6619-6626.
(12) (a) Harris J. M.; Keranen, M. D.; O’Doherty, G. A. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 2982-2983. (b) Harris, J. M.; Keranen, M. D.; Nguyen, H.;
Young, V. G.; O’Doherty, G. A. Carbohydrate Res. 2000, 328(1), 17-36.
(13) Harris, J. M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 183-
187.
(16) (a) Grapsas, I.; Couladouros, E. A.; Georgiadis, M. P. Pol. J. Chem.
1990, 64, 823. (b) Georgiadis, M. P.; Couladoros, E. A. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 2725-2727.
(17) Achmatowicz, O.; Bielski, R. Carbohydr. Res. 1977, 55, 165.
(18) All new compounds were identified and characterized by 1H NMR,
13C NMR, FTIR, HRMS, and EA analysis.
(14) (a) Taniguchi, T.; Nakamura, K.; Ogasawara, K. Synlett 1996, 971.
(a) Taniguchi, T.; Ohnishi, H.; Ogasawara, K. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1477-
1478. For a review, see: (c) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless,
K. B. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2483-2547.
(15) Enantiomeric excesses were determined by 1H NMR and 19F NMR
of the Mosher ester derivative.
(19) The cis/trans selectivity of the Wittig reaction decreased to 4:1 at 0
°C and to 2:1 at room temperature.
2984
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 19, 2000