elucidate the mechanism of formation of 6 and the use
of phosphavinyl tin compounds in Stille reactions will form
the basis of a forthcoming publication.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge support from the EPSRC (student-
ship for A. F. R.).
Notes and references
† Synthesis and spectroscopic data for 3 and 4: A solution of 2 (0.50 g,
2.05 mmol) in Et2O (25 ml) was added to SnMe2Cl2 (0.24 g, 1.08 mmol)
in Et2O (25 ml) at Ϫ50 ЊC. The resulting solution was warmed slowly to
room temperature, stirred overnight and volatiles removed in vacuo to
yield a yellow oil which consisted of several inseparable phosphorus-
containing products (see text). The oil was dissolved in THF (5 ml) and
added to a solution of [W(CO)5(THF)] (1.9 mmol) in THF (50 ml).
After 18 h volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue chrom-
atographed (Kieselgel, Et2O–hexane 50:50) and partially overlapping
yellow and orange fractions collected. These were concentrated in vacuo
to yield orange crystals of 3 (yield 42% approx., mp 123–126 ЊC on
single crystal) and yellow crystals of 4 (yield 18% approx., mp 163–
168 ЊC dec. on single crystal). Data for 3: 31P{1H} NMR (145.8 MHz,
C6D6) δ 77.6 (s, P(2)), 253.9 (s, P(1), 1JPW 232 Hz); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
C6D6) δ 0.48 (s, 3H, SnMe), 0.69 (s, 3H, SnMe), 0.95 (s, 9H, But), 1.22
(s, 9H, But) 0.71–2.12 (m, 22H, Cy); APCI-MS: m/z 783 (Mϩ Ϫ CO,
100%), 516 (Mϩ Ϫ W(CO)4, 73%); IR (Nujol, ν/cmϪ1) 2027 m, 1951 s,
1939 s; Data for 4: 31P{1H} NMR (145.8 MHz, C6D6) δ Ϫ108.7 (s, P(2)),
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of 3. Selected bond lengths (Å) and
angles (Њ): P(1)–C(3) 1.666(5), P(2)–C(14) 1.754(5), P(1)–W(1) 2.501(2),
P(2)–W(1) 2.6384(17), C(14)–W(1) 2.481(6); Sn(1)–C(3)–P(1) 108.7(3),
Sn(1)–C(14)–P(2) 120.0(3), C(3)–P(1)–W(1) 123.1(2), C(14)–W(1)–P(2)
39.91(12).
1
1
29.5 (s, P(1) JSnP 190, JPW 226 Hz); 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6)
δ 0.74 (s, 3H, SnMe), 0.82 (s, 3H, SnMe), 0.91 (s, 9H, But), 1.24 (s, 9H,
But), 0.76–1.95 (m, 22H, Cy); APCI-MS: m/z 516 (Mϩ Ϫ W(CO)5,
100%), 366 (P2Cy2C2But2, 44%); IR (Nujol, ν/cmϪ1) 2035 m, 1980 s,
1928 m; reproducible microanalyses proved difficult to obtain due to
the partial co-crystallisation of 3 and 4.
‡ Crystal data for 3: C28H46O4P2SnW, M = 811.13 triclinic, space group
¯
P1, a = 10.759(9), b = 11.445(8), c = 16.379(6) Å, α = 103.38(5), β =
98.22(5), γ = 112.86(7)Њ; V = 1746(2) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.543 g cmϪ3
,
F(000) = 800, µ(Mo-Kα) = 41.25 cmϪ1, 150(2) K, 6261 unique reflec-
tions, R (on F) 0.0342, wR (on F2) 0.0919 (I > 2σI). 4: C29H46O5P2SnW,
M = 839.14, monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 35.7212(10), b =
10.3448(12), c = 20.0542(15) Å, β = 90.239(11)Њ; V = 7410.5(10) Å3,
Z = 8, Dc = 1.504 g cmϪ3, F(000) = 3312, µ(Mo-Kα) = 38.92 cmϪ1
,
293(2) K, 4436 unique reflections, R (on F) 0.0997, wR (on F 2) 0.2474
(I > 2σI). All crystallographic measurements were made using an
Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer. The structure was solved by direct
methods and refined on F 2 by full matrix least squares (SHELX 97)8
using all unique data. All non-hydrogen atoms are anisotropic with H-
atoms included in calculated positions (riding model). Empirical
absorption corrections were carried out by the DIFABS method.9
CCDC reference number 186/2154.
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and
angles (Њ): Sn(1)–P(1) 2.506(6), Sn(1)–C(2) 2.17(2), P(1)–C(1) 1.90(2),
P(2)–C(1) 1.91(2), P(2)–C(2) 1.89(2); Sn(1)–P(1)–C(1) 81.4(6), P(1)–
Sn(1)–C(2) 73.9(5), P(1)–C(1)–C(2) 105.5(13), Sn(1)–C(2)–C(1)
98.6(12), C(1)–P(2)–C(2) 51.2(9).
1 Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II, ed. E. W. Abel, F. G. A.
Stone and G. Wilkinson, Pergamon, Oxford, 1995, vol. 11.
2 K. B. Dillon, F. Mathey and J. F. Nixon, in Phosphorus: The Carbon
Copy, Wiley, Chichester, 1998.
3 D. E. Hibbs, C. Jones and A. F. Richards, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1999, 3531.
within the four membered ring it is safe to assume there is a
high degree of p-character to the bonding within the ring,
which would explain why no two-bond PP or SnP couplings are
observed in the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of 4.
In related work we have investigated the reaction of 2 with
SnCl2 or SnCl4 in an attempt to form homoleptic phosphavinyl
tin compounds. Interestingly, however, both reactions lead to
an oxidative coupling of the phosphavinyl fragment and form-
ation of the highly strained 2,4-diphosphabicyclo[1.1.0]butane,
P2(Cy)2C2(But)2. The results of this study, our efforts to
4 J. Tsuji, Palladium Reagents and Catalysts, Wiley, Chichester, 1997,
ch. 4.
5 V. D. Romanenko, A. O. Gudima, A. N. Chernega and G. Bertrand,
Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 3493.
6 M. Schmitz, R. Göller, U. Bergsträsser, S. Leininger and M. Regitz,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 1998, 227.
7 L. Weber, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 271 and refs
therein.
8 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX-97, University of Göttingen, 1997.
9 Z. Otwinowski and W. Minor, in Methods in Enzymology, ed. C. W.
Carter and R. M. Sweet, Academic Press, New York, 1996.
3234
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000, 3233–3234