Cationic Cyclopentadienyl Diene Mo Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2001 991
Transformation of allylic precursors of the type (η3-
allyl)MoCp(CO)2 into (η4-diene)MoCp(CO)2 cations al-
most exclusively involves abstraction of a hydride ion.
This methodology offers the most general entry into
cationic diene complexes, since the precursors are
usually obtained in high yields via oxidative addition
of readily available allylic halides or acetates. Reactive
Mo(0) species such as (MeCN)3Mo(CO)3 are conveniently
formed in situ upon refluxing molybdenum hexacarbo-
nyl in acetonitrile. Importantly, this two-step procedure
allows the preparation of synthetically useful complexes
also with labile dienes, such as cyclopentadienone7 and
2H-pyran.8
The standard protocol for hydride abstraction from
(π-allyl)molybdenum complexes involves treatment with
a trityl salt (Ph3CPF6 or Ph3CBF4) in dichloromethane,
followed by precipitaion.9 These reactions proceed un-
eventfully with most simple substrates. However, ap-
plication to more highly substituted allylic substrates
is problematic, probably as a consequence of the steric
bulkiness of the trityl ion in combination with the
stereoelectronic requirement1,9b for removal of a hydride
anti to molybdenum.10 Unfortunately, traditional trityl
ion mediated hydride abstraction has remained the only
general source of diene complexes from allylic precur-
sors. An alternative oxidation procedure, entailing
treatment of the allylmolybdenum precursor with DDQ
in the presence of HBF4‚Et2O at low temperature, has
been reported but not generally adapted. In special
cases, where the η3-organomolybdenum substrate car-
ries a suitably positioned leaving group, such as
alkoxy3c,4,6,8a,b or indolyl,3b elimination forming diene
complexes has been observed.
F igu r e 2. Reactions of model substrate 1 with trityl
halides in the presence of HFiP.
of moisture-sensitive and expensive trityl salts as well
as operating under strictly anhydrous conditions. We
also speculated that in situ generation of carbocations
might allow the use of additional carbocation precursors,
especially those presenting less sterical requirements,
which do not form isolable cation salts. Herein, we
report full details of extended studies on the use of tri-
and diarylmethane derivatives as hydride abstraction
reagents.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
We recently reported16 that hydride abstraction from
the allylic complex 1 proceeds smoothly in 80-86% yield
using Ph3CBr as a trityl cation precursor in 20% (v/v)
of HFiP in dichloromethane. The procedure involved
stirring at 0 °C for 1 h and simple isolation of the
cationic product by addition of degassed diethyl ether
followed by decantation. The objective of the work
reported herein was to explore the influence of variables
such as the concentration of HFiP, solvent, and car-
bocation precursor on the efficiency of the hydride
abstraction process.
We recently communicated on an alternative proce-
dure for hydride abstraction, in which trityl cation was
generated in situ from Ph3CBr. Key to this protocol was
the utilization of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol11
(HFiP) as a cosolvent. HFiP is a weakly acidic (pKa )
9.4)12 and strongly hydrogen bonding13 solvent, which
has previously been used in studies of carbocation
behavior14 and also as a convenient and efficient reagent
for the cleavage of synthetic peptides from 2-chlorotrityl
resin.15 We anticipated that generating trityl ion in situ
in this fashion might provide a convenient alternative
to the traditional methodology, which requires handling
Solven t Mixtu r e Com p osition . In dichloromethane
containing 20% (v/v) HFiP, Ph3CBr presumably dissoci-
ates into free trityl cation, which, in turn, mediates
hydride abstraction from a suitable donor (Figure 2).
Evaluation of the minimum concentration of HFiP
required for the reaction was undertaken by NMR
experiments. In solutions of Ph3CBr in CD2Cl2 contain-
ing 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, or 20% (v/v) HFiP, the 1H NMR
signals from the aromatic protons changed dramatically
with increasing concentration of HFiP. The original
multiplet from Ph3CBr observed at low HFiP concentra-
tions (0, 2, and 5%) was disrupted into two triplets and
a doublet moving downfield with increasing concentra-
tions (10, 15, and 20%). In comparison, the resonances
recorded from the ionic Ph3CPF6 in the same solvent
mixtures17 were unaffected by the HFiP concentration.
In the presence of about 15% (v/v) of HFiP, the appear-
ance of the spectrum resulting from trityl bromide was
observed to approach that of Ph3CPF6. Our interpreta-
tion was that significant dissociation to form trityl
cation occurred at 10, 15, and 20% HFiP and that the
equilibrium between trityl bromide and trityl cation was
in favor of the latter at the highest HFiP concentrations.
At low HFiP content, the situation was further compli-
cated by apparent hydrolysis forming trityl alcohol.
Upon introduction of the hydride donor 1 into the
NMR samples, rapid hydride abstraction was observed
at concentrations of HFiP from 10% (v/v) and above.
(6) Pearson, A. J .; Khetani, V. D. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3395.
(7) (a) Liebeskind, L. S.; Bombrun, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
8736. (b) Slugovc, C.; Mauthner, K.; Mereiter, K.; Schmid, R.; Kirchner,
K. Organometallics 1996, 15, 2954.
(8) (a) Rubio, A.; Liebeskind, L. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
891. (b) Hansson, S.; Miller, J . F.; Liebeskind, L. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 9660.
(9) (a) Faller, J . W.; Rosan, A. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4858.
(b) Faller, J . W.; Murray, H. H.; White, D. L.; Chao, K. H. Organome-
tallics 1983, 2, 400. (c) Pearson, A. J .; Khan, M. N. I. J . Org. Chem.
1985, 50, 5276. (d) Pearson, A. J .; Khan, M. N. I.; Clardy, J . C.; Cun-
heng, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2748.
(10) The same factors preclude sequential 1,2-difunctionalisation in
the analogous cyclohexadienyl iron series; e.g., see ref 1.
(11) HFiP is a sensory irritant, see: Nielsen, G. D.; Abraham, M.
H.; Hansen, L. F.; Hammer, M.; Cooksey, C. J .; Andonian-Haftvan,
J .; Alarie, Y. Arch. Toxicol. 1996, 70, 319.
(12) Arrowsmith, C. H.; Kresge, A. J .; Tang, Y. C. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 179.
(13) Abraham, M. H.; Duce, P. P.; Prior, D. V.; Barratt, D. G.; Morris,
J . J .; Taylor, P. J . J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1989, 1355.
(14) (a) McClelland, R. A.; Mathivanan, N.; Steenken, S. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4857. (b) Cozens, F.; Li, J .; McClelland, R. A.;
Steenken, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 743.
(15) Bollhagen, R.; Schmiedberger, M.; Barlos, K.; Grell, E. J . Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2559.
(16) Bjurling, E.; Andersson, C.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1981.
(17) Resonances were as follows: δ 8.29 (tt, J ) 7.5, 1.2 Hz), 7.90
(t, J ) 7.5 Hz), 7.68 (dd, J ) 1.2, 8.4 Hz).