Imageable Curcuminoid EFAH
model. To our knowledge, this is the first image-based non-invasive
investigation of EF24.
eluted with 10% methanol in methylene chloride. The fractions con-
taining the pure compound were collected and concentrated to dry-
ness to obtain the compound 2 as a yellow solid (252 mg, 53%
yield, m.p. 151–152 ꢀC).
Methods and Materials
All reagents were obtained from commercial sources and were used
N’-(5-{2-[3,5-Bis-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-4-oxo-
piperidin-1-yl]-ethylcarbamoyl}-pyridin-2-yl)-
hydrazinecarboxylic acid tert-butyl ester (3)
Succunimidyl-6-boc-hydrazinonicotinic acid was synthesized in-house
following a reported method (16). Succunimidyl-6-boc-hydrazinoni-
cotinic acid (360 mg, 1.03 mmol) was added to compound 2
(280 mg, 0.79 mmol) in DMF containing diisopropyl ethylamine
(650 lL, 3.95 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room tem-
perature for 48 h and monitored by TLC where a new spot
appeared with polarity in between the reactants. After completion
of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated to dryness, and the
pure conjugate was separated by column chromatography on silica
(200–300 mesh) with 10% methanol in chloroform. The fractions
containing the desired compound were collected and dried to yield
compound 3 as yellow foamy solid (290 mg, 62% yield, m.p. 123–
125 ꢀC). Rf (10% methanol in chloroform) = 0.40.
1
directly without further purification. H NMR spectra and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded at 300 and 75 MHz on Varian VX-300 (Varian
Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The spectra were referenced to the resid-
ual protonated solvents. Abbreviations such as s, d, t, m, br and dd
used in the description of NMR spectra denote singlet, doublet,
triplet, multiplet, broad, and double doublet respectively. The chemi-
cal shifts and coupling constants were reported in d parts per mil-
lion (p.p.m.) and hertz (Hz), respectively. The mass spectra were
recorded by Finnigon MAT LCQ mass spectrometer (San Jose, CA,
USA). The NMR and mass spectroscopy data for the synthesized
compounds are provided in the supplemental document (Appendix
S1). The reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-
HPLC) was performed with Beckman Model 126 pump, 166 absor-
bance detector, Bioscan Model B-FC-300 radioisotope detector. HPLC
solvents consisted of water and acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroace-
tic acid. Radionuclide Tc-99m, as pertechnetate, was obtained from
OUHSC Nuclear Pharmacy (Oklahoma City, OK, USA). All intermedi-
ate and final products were monitored by thin layer chromatography
(TLC) on 250-lm silica plates. Where applicable, the compounds
were purified by column chromatography using 200–300 mesh silica
gel columns. Melting points were recorded on an Electrothermal
Mel-Temp melting point apparatus (Thermo Scientific, Waltham,
MA, USA). The reported melting points (ꢀC) are uncorrected.
N-{2-[3,5-Bis-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-4-oxo-piperidin-
1-yl]-ethyl}-6-hydrazinonicotinamide (4)
To deprotect compound 3, hydrochloric acid (55 lL of 11 N) was
added to a solution of compound 3 in 5 mL of methylene chloride
(120 mg, 0.20 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room tem-
perature for 5 h, and a slower moving spot was obtained in TLC.
The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness, and compound 4
was isolated as yellow solid. Methylene chloride and ether wash
was given to the solid to remove the impurities (86 mg, 87% yield,
m.p. 222–224ꢀC). Rf (30% MeOH in Chloroform) = 0.10.
3,5-Bis-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-4-piperidone (1)
Hydrochloric Acid gas (generated in situ) was bubbled into a solu-
tion of 4-piperidone hydrochloride monohydrate (3 g, 19.5 mmol) in
glacial acetic acid (80 mL) until a clear solution was obtained
(about 15 min). To the reaction mixture, 2-fluorobenzaldehyde (6 mL,
56.5 mmol) was added and the mixture was left at room tempera-
ture for 48 h. The crystals formed were filtered on a Buchner fun-
nel, washed with absolute ethanol (50 mL) and ether (50 mL), and
followed by drying to obtain 1 as yellow crystalline solid (5.71 g,
94% yield, m.p. 185–186 ꢀC). Free base of 1 was generated by
treating the acetate salt with 10% potassium carbonate solution.
Partition coefficient
The partition coefficient (KO ⁄ W) was determined in triplicate in octa-
nol ⁄ water system. The initial oil and water phases were prepared
as phases saturated in the other solvent. About 20 mL of octanol
was mixed with 20 mL deionized water in a screw-capped glass
bottle and agitated overnight at 25 ꢀC. The mixture was allowed to
settle for 6 h to separate water-rich octanol phase (oil phase), from
octanol-rich water phase (water phase). About 3.0 mg of drug was
dissolved in 2 mL of oil phase in a screw-capped glass tube, and
2 mL of water phase was added. The tubes were agitated over-
night followed by a 6 h equilibrium period. EFAH was spectrophoto-
metrically analysed in both the phases and estimated against a
calibration curve. KO ⁄ W was calculated as a ratio between drug in
oil and water phases.
1-(2-Aminoethyl)-3,5-bis-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-4-
piperidone (2)
2-Bromoethylamine hydrobromide (204 mg, 1.00 mmol), compound 1
(311 mg, 1.00 mmol), cesium carbonate (325 mg, 1.00 mmol) and
potassium iodide (166 mg, 1.00 mmol) were taken together in a
flask containing DMF (5 mL). The reaction mixture was heated at
80 ꢀC for 18 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by an
appearance of a new spot in silica TLC. After the reaction was
complete, the reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was
dried. The residue was dissolved in chloroform and washed with
saturated sodium chloride solution followed by water. The organic
phase was separated, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and
concentrated to obtain a crude yellow solid. The crude compound
was passed through a silica column, and the title compound was
Tc-99m-labelled N-{2-[3,5-Bis-(2-
fluorobenzylidene)-4-oxo-piperidin-1-yl]-ethyl}-6-
hydrazinonicotinamide (5)
About 300 lL of tricine solution (100 mg ⁄ mL in water) was added
to a solution of compound 4 (30 lg) in 30 lL water. Na99mTcO4
(2 mCi in 0.5 mL of saline) and 10 lL SnCl2 solution (1 mg ⁄ mL in
Chem Biol Drug Des 2012; 79: 194–201
195