was found that the treatment with GD1 in the presence of
NaBArA4 (ArA = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3) resulted in complete ligand
exchange and produced the first generation dendrimer G1 in a
quantitative yield (Scheme 3). Similarly, the second generation
dendrimer G2 was also prepared by the reaction of 7 with GD2
in quantitative yield. However, no exchange of chloride ligand
with GD3 took place and third generation dendrimer G3 did not
form at all. The difference in reactivity between GD2 and GD3
may arise from the steric effect of GD3.
The absence of structural defects in dendrimers G1 and G2
was confirmed by spectral analysis. A singlet signal assignable
to PEt3 on palladium was observed at d 32.2 in the 31P NMR
spectrum of G2 while the spectrum of 7 showed a signal at d
32.7. The 1H NMR spectrum of G2 exhibited a sharp singlet at
d 2.87 due to the methyl protons of the central mesitylene
moiety while the methyl signal of 7 was observed at d 3.14. In
1
the H NMR spectrum of G2 the integral ratio of the central
methyl signal relative to that of the methoxy protons situated at
the surface was 1+4. These data clearly suggest that all chloride
ligands on palladium were replaced with the pyridyl groups of
GD2, and are consistent with the structure of G2.
Treatment of dendrimer G1 with excess Bu4NCl in benzene
led to the quantitative formation of core 7 and dendron GD1
(Scheme 4). Similar treatment of dendrimer G2 regenerated 7
and GD2 in quantitative yield. These results suggest that the
bonding of dendrons GD1 and GD2 to core 7 can be reversibly
controlled by the ligand exchange reaction. Quantitative
formation of G1 and dissociation into 7 and GD1 were repeated
up to three times by successive treatment of NaBArA4 and
Bu4NCl, respectively. These results show the first examples of
morphology control in dendrimers by chemical stimuli other
than light.6
Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: i, 9 Bu4NCl, benzene, room temp., 30
min, quantitative yields.
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research on Priority Areas, (No. 11136224 ‘Metal-assembled
Complexes’) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports
and Culture. We thank The Material Analysis Center, ISIR,
Osaka University, for support of spectroscopic and elemental
analyses.
Notes and references
1 D. A. Tomalia, A. M. Naylor and W. G. A. Goddard III, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 29, 138; J. Issberner, R. Moors and F. Vögtle,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 2413; A. W. Bosman, H. M.
Janssen and E. W. Meijer, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 1665; A. Adronov and
J. M. J. Fréchet, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1701.
2 M. A. Hearshaw and J. R. Moss, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1; I. Cuadrado,
M. Morán, C. M. Casado, B. Alonso and J. Losada, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
1999, 193–195, 395; G. R. Newkome, E. He and C. N. Moorefield, Chem.
Rev., 1999, 99, 1689.
3 N. Ohshiro, F. Takei, K. Onitsuka and S. Takahashi, Chem. Lett., 1996,
871; N. Ohshiro, F. Takei, K. Onitsuka and S. Takahashi, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1998, 569, 195.
4 K. Onitsuka, M. Fujimoto, N. Ohshiro and S. Takahashi, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 689.
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, 3.3 NaBArA4, benzene, room temp.,
30 min, quantitative yields.
5 A. Archut, G. C. Azzellini, V. Balzani, L. De Cola and F. Vögtle, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 12187.
6 M. Smet, L.-X. Liao, W. Dehaen and D. V. McGrath, Org. Lett., 2000, 2,
511; Y. Takaguchi, S. Suzuki, T. Mori, J. Motoyoshiya and H. Aoyama,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2000, 73, 1857.
6 with dendrons.7 Although chloride ligands on complex 6 are
easily replaced with pyridine in the presence of KPF6, the
reaction of complex 6 with GD1 allowed only partial ligand
exchange to give a mixture of the desired dendrimer and other
complexes having one or two GD1 in the molecule. Therefore,
the core was changed to a palladium–acetylide complex 7 and it
7 K. Onitsuka, H. Ogawa, T. Joh and S. Takahashi, Chem. Lett., 1988,
1855.
742
Chem. Commun., 2001, 741–742