1144 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2002, Vol. 45, No. 5
Brief Articles
on Specord M80 spectrometer. 1H NMR (250 MHz), 13NMR
(62.9 MHz), and 31P NMR (101 MHz) spectra were recorded
on Brucker DPX250 spectrometer with TMS as an internal
standard and 85% H3PO4 as an external standard, respec-
tively. 31P NMR spectra were recorded using broadband proton
decoupling.
HL-60 cells. Matching relationships between the sub-
stituent on the carbinol carbon atom C-1′ and activity
were observed for both cell lines, with furanone 7e (R1
) Ph) being the most potent and furanone 7a (R1 ) H)
the least potent compound. Furanones 7c,d with alkyl
substituents (R1 ) Me, Pr) displayed intermediate
activity. Both diastereoisomers of compounds 7c-e were
tested, but no significant differences in activity were
found. Also, the optically active (5R,1′R) 7e (90% ee) and
racemic (5R*,1′R*) 7e were almost equipotent. The most
potent compound in the series, furanone 7e, had the
activity comparable to carboplatin against L-1210 cells.
In the search for more clear structure-activity rela-
tionships in furanones 7a -e, we decided to determine
their lipophilicity. Correlation between lipophilic char-
acter of the compound, expressed as the partition
coefficient P in 1-octanol/water system, and its biological
activity have proven meaningful.21 Moreover, structure-
cytotoxicity investigations among sesquiterpene lactones
revealed that an increase in cytotoxicity usually ac-
companies increased lipophilicity.4 Lipophilicities of
furanones 7a -e were calculated using the standard
software package Pallas (CompuDrug Chemistry, Hun-
gary) and the results, expressed as log P, are given in
Table 1. To test the accuracy of the calculations, the
lipophilicity of 7a was also determined experimentally
using a spectrophotometric method.4 Pleasingly, experi-
mental and calculated values for 7a were very similar
(log P ) 0.09 and 0.15, respectively). Examination of
the calculated log P values revealed straightforward
correlation between lipophilicity and cytotoxicity, with
the more lipophilic compound being also more cytotoxic.
However, significant difference in lipohilicity between
7c (log P ) 0.55) and 7d (log P ) 1.59) is reflected in
only a marginal increase of cytotoxicity. Obviously and
not surprisingly, other factors such as steric bulk/steric
hindrance and/or electronic effects might also influence
cytotoxicity of these compounds.
In conclusion, we synthesized a series of 1′-hydroxy-
alkyl-3-methylidenetetrahydro-2-furanones 7a -e with
different substituents on the carbinol carbon atom C-1′
using a unique combination of syn- or anti-dihydroxy-
lation of 4-alkenoic acids (E)-4 or alkenoates (E)-8 and
the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefination reaction.
All prepared compounds were evaluated for their cyto-
toxic activity against L-1210 and HL-60 leukemia cells
and invariably were more cytotoxic against the former
ones. The effect of the substitution at the carbinol
carbon atom C-1′ was also consistent for both cell lines,
with activity increasing from unsubstituted through
alkyl to phenyl substituted compounds. Calculated
lipophilicity increased in the same order. No significant
differences in cytotoxicity of stereoisomers were found.
Further studies to increase the activity of furanones 7
by introducing more lipophilic substituents (R1) and also
by changing their steric bulk and electronic character
are currently in progress in our laboratory.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of 5-(1′-Hy-
d r oxya lk yl)-3-m eth ylid en etetr a h yd r o-2-fu r a n on es 7. A
mixture of phosphonate 6 (2.0 mmol), K2CO3 (0.829 g; 6.0
mmol), and aqueous 36% formaldehyde solution (1.1 mL; 14.0
mmol) was stirred at 0-5 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture
was extracted with Et2O (4 × 10 mL), and the combined
organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried, and
evaporated. The crude product was purified by column chro-
matography (silica gel, CHCl3:acetone ) 9:1 as eluent).
5-(H yd r oxym et h yl)-3-m et h ylid en et et r a h yd r o-2-fu r a -
n on e (7a ): oil, 70% yield (lit.10 55%); Rf ) 0.20 (CHCl3: acetone
) 9:1); IR (film) v 3432 (O-H), 1760 (CdO), 1664 (CdC) cm-1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.30 (t, J ) 6.50 Hz, 1H, O-H), 2.86 (ddt,
J ) 17.26, 6.00, 3.00 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 3.00 (ddt, J ) 17.26, 8.00,
3.00 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 3.66 (ddd, J ) 12.51, 6.50, 4.75 Hz, 1H,
H-C-1′), 3.91 (ddd, J ) 12.51, 6.50, 3.00 Hz, 1H, H-C-1′), 4.66
(dddd, J ) 8.00, 6.00, 4.75, 3.00 Hz, 1H, HC-5), 5.68 (t, J )
3.00 Hz, 1H, dCH), 6.26 (t, J ) 3.00 Hz, 1H, dCH); 13C NMR
(CDCl3) δ 27.8 (C-4), 63.0 (C-1′), 76.6 (C-5), 121.4 (dCH2), 133.4
(C-3), 169.7 (C-2). Anal. (C6H8O3) C, H.
5-(Hydr oxym eth yl)-5-m eth yl-3-m eth yliden etetr ah ydr o-
2-fu r a n on e (7b): 63% yield, white solid; mp 67-68 °C (lit.13
63%, mp 66-68 °C); Rf ) 0.26 (CHCl3:acetone ) 9:1); IR (film)
ν 3480 (O-H), 1756 (CdO), 1664 (CdC) cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 1.40 (s, 3H, CH3C-5), 2.18 (bs, 1H, O-H), 2.63 (dt, J ) 17.01,
2.75 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 3.08 (dt, J ) 17.01, 2.75 Hz, 1H, HC-4),
3.53 (d, J ) 12.01 Hz, 1H, HC-1′), 3.72 (d, J ) 12.01 Hz, 1H,
HC-1′), 5.65 (t, J ) 2.75 Hz, 1H, dCH), 6.24 (t, J ) 2.75 Hz,
1H, dCH); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 22.4 (CH3C-4), 34.7 (C-4), 66.9
(C-1′), 82.9 (C-5), 121.1 (dCH2), 134.8 (C-3), 169.4 (C-2). Anal.
(C7H10O3) C, H.
(5R*,1′R*)-5-(1′-Hyd r oxyeth yl)-3-m eth ylid en etetr a h y-
d r o-2-fu r a n on e (7c): mixture of (5R*,1′R*)- and (5R*,1′S*)-
(7c) in 80/20 ratio; oil, 44% yield; Rf ) 0.30 (CHCl3:acetone )
9:1); IR (film) ν 3460 (O-H), 1754 (CdO), 1664 (CdC) cm-1
;
data for (5R*,1′R*)-7c: 1H NMR22 (CDCl3) δ 1.28 (d, J ) 6.50
Hz, 3H, H3C-2′), 2.13 (bs, 1H, O-H), 2.78 (ddt, J ) 17.26, 5.50,
2.75 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 2.99 (ddt, J ) 17.26, 8.00, 2.75 Hz, 1H,
HC-4), 3.78 (quin, J ) 6.50 Hz, 1H, HC-1′), 4.37 (ddd, J )
8.00, 6.50, 5.50 Hz, 1H, HC-5), 5.67 (t, J ) 2.75 Hz, 1H, d
CH), 6.25 (t, J ) 2.75 Hz, 1H, dCH); 13C NMR22 (CDCl3) δ
17.4 (C-2′), 28.7 (C-4), 68.6 (C-1′), 79.7 (C-5), 121.5 (dCH2),
133.0 (C-3), 169.0 (C-2). Anal. (C7H10O3) C, H.
(5R*,1′S*)-5-(1′-Hyd r oxyeth yl)-3-m eth ylid en etetr a h y-
d r o-2-fu r a n on e 7c: mixture of (5R*,1′S*)- and (5R*,1′R*)-
7c in 80/20 ratio; oil, 59% yield; Rf ) 0.30 (CHCl3:acetone )
9:1); IR (film) ν 3456 (O-H), 1752 (CdO), 1664 (CdC) cm-1
;
data for (5R*,1′S*)-7c:1H NMR22 (CDCl3) δ 1.21 (d, J ) 6.50
Hz, 3H, H3C-2′), 1.99 (bs, 1H, O-H), 2.88 (ddt, J ) 17.26, 8.00,
2.50 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 2.99 (ddt, J ) 17.26, 6.50, 2.50 Hz, 1H,
HC-4), 4.12 (qd, J ) 6.50, 3.25 Hz, 1H, HC-1′), 4.43 (ddd, J )
8.00, 6.50, 3.25 Hz, 1H, HC-5), 5.67 (t, J ) 2.50 Hz, 1H, d
CH), 6.26 (t, J ) 2.50 Hz, 1H, dCH); 13C NMR22 (CDCl3) δ
16.6 (C-2′), 26.1 (C-4), 66.5 (C-1′), 79.3 (C-5), 121.2 (dCH2),
133.4 (C-3), 169.5 (C-2). Anal. (C7H10O3) C, H.
(5R*,1′R*)-5-(1′-Hyd r oxybu tyl)-3-m eth ylid en etetr a h y-
d r o-2-fu r a n on e (5R*,1′R*)-7d : oil, 62% yield; Rf ) 0.33
(CHCl3:acetone ) 9:1); IR (film) ν 3450 (O-H), 176054 (Cd
O), 1664 (CdC) cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.96 (t, J ) 7.25 Hz,
3H, H3C-4′), 1.33-1.68 (m, 4H, H2C-2′ and H2C-3′), 1.95 (bs,
1H, O-H), 2.85 (ddt, J ) 17.26, 6.25, 3.00 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 2.98
(ddt, J ) 17.26, 8.00, 3.00 Hz, 1H, HC-4), 3.54-3.63 (m, 1H,
HC-1′), 4.44 (ddd, J ) 8.00, 6.25, 4.50 Hz, 1H, HC-5), 5.66 (t,
J ) 3.00 Hz, 1H, dCH), 6.24 (t, J ) 3.00 Hz, 1H, dCH); 13C
NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.8 (C-4′), 18.6 (C-3′), 29.5 (C-4), 34.7 (C-2′),
72.8 (C-1′), 79.5 (C-5), 121.9 (dCH2), 134.2 (C-3), 170.3 (C-2).
Anal. (C9H14O3) C, H.
Exp er im en ta l Section
All reactions requiring anhydrous and oxygen-free condi-
tions were conducted in an argon atmosphere. THF was freshly
distilled from NaH before use. Pyridine was distilled and
stored over KOH. All other solvents were of pure grade and
used as received. Column chromatography was performed on
Fluka silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh). IR spectra were recorded