diene 4b (10.8 g, 82%) as a colorless oil, δH (270 MHz) 0.88
(3H, t, J 6.6, Me), 1.26–1.54 (26H, m, CH2), 3.41–3.53
in MeOH was added in order to promote ionization of the
neutral species.
(3H, m, OCH CHO), 3.98–4.19 (4H, m, 2 × CH CH᎐CH ),
᎐
2
2
2
5.12–5.31 (4H, m, 2 × CH CH᎐CH ), 5.84–6.00 (2H, m, 2 ×
Electrode preparation and EMF measurements
᎐
2
2
CH CH᎐CH ).
᎐
2
2
PVC matrix-based ion-sensitive membranes were prepared
according to the procedures described previously.12 The poly-
meric membrane composition was 3 wt% ionophore, 64 wt%
membrane solvent o-NPOE, 33 wt% PVC, and 0–100 mol%
(relative to the ionophore) TDDMACl. The membrane
thickness was ≈100 µm. A 6 mm diameter circle was cut
from a prepared membrane and placed on the tip of a PVC ion-
selective electrode body assembly (Liquid Electrode Membrane
Kit, DKK Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The prepared electrodes
were immersed in 0.1 mol dmϪ3 aq. NaCl for more than 24 h for
preconditioning before use. The external reference electrode
was a double-junction-type Ag–AgCl electrode (HS-305DS,
Toa Electronics, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The electrode potential
(EMF) measurements were performed according to the
reported procedure at 25 0.5 ЊC using the electrochemical cell
system, Ag|AgCl| saturated KCl | 0.3 mol dmϪ3 NH4NO3 ||
sample solution|ISE membrane|0.1 mol dmϪ3 NaCl|AgCl|Ag.
All sample solutions were prepared from sodium salts with
0.1 mol dmϪ3 HEPES–NaOH buffer solution at pH 7.0. The
selectivity coefficients Ki,jpot, where i stands for the primary ion
(ClϪ) and j for the interfering ion, were calculated from the
response potentials in the sodium anion salt solution using the
5-Tetradecyl-4,7-dioxadecane-1,10-diol 5b. The hydrobor-
ation of diene 4b (10.8 g, 31.9 mmol) with NaBH4 (1.09 g, 28.7
mmol) and boron trifluoride–diethyl ether complex (5.44 g, 38.3
mmol) was carried out as described for the preparation of 5a.
The reaction mixture was worked up as above, and purification
by chromatography on silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 1 : 4) gave
diol 5b (2.90 g, 24%) as a colorless oil, νmax (neat)/cmϪ1 3400,
1120, 1083; δH (300 MHz) 0.88 (3H, t, J 6.6, Me), 1.26 (24H,
br s, CH2), 1.46 (2H, br s, CHCH2), 1.76–1.86 (4H, m,
HOCH2CH2), 3.07 and 3.27 (2H, br, OH), 3.39–3.50 (3H, m,
OCH2CHO), 3.62–3.78 (8H, m, HOCH2CH2CH2).
5-Tetradecyl-4,7-dioxasebacic acid diethyl ester 6b. The oxid-
ation of diol 5b (1.62 g, 4.32 mmol) with sodium periodate
(5.55 g, 25.9 mmol) and ruthenium() chloride hydrate (40 mg,
0.19 mmol) was carried out as described for the preparation of
6a. The crude dicarboxylic acid was converted to the ethyl ester
as above and purified by chromatography on silica gel (hexane–
EtOAc, 4 : 1) to give ester 6b (1.03 g, 52% for two steps) as a
colorless oil, νmax (neat)/cmϪ1 1738, 1186, 1120; δH (300 MHz)
0.88 (3H, t, J 6.8, Me), 1.23–1.49 (32H, m, CH2 and
OCH2CH3), 2.55 and 2.57 (4H, t, J 6.2, 2 × COCH2), 3.38–3.47
(3H, m, OCH2CHO), 3.70–3.89 (4H, m, 2 × COCH2CH2), 4.14
and 4.15 (4H, q, J 7.1, 2 × OCH2CH3).
separate-solution method (SSM; [i] = [j] = 0.1 mol dmϪ3
)
according to the recommendations of IUPAC13 and JIS.14
Acknowledgements
D. C. gratefully acknowledges a post-doctoral fellowship
granted by the Science and Technology Agency of Japan (STA).
N,NЈ-Bis(benzyloxy)-5-tetradecyl-4,7-dioxasebacic
acid
diamide 2b. The hydrolysis of ester 6b (500 mg, 1.09 mmol)
followed by conversion to the acid chloride and subsequent
reaction with O-benzylhydroxylamine hydrochloride were
carried out as described for the preparation of 2a. The crude
product was purified by chromatography on silica gel (CHCl3–
EtOAc, 1 : 2) to give the receptor 2b (379 mg, 57% for three
steps) as a white solid, mp 73–74 ЊC; νmax (KBr)/cmϪ1 3220,
1653, 697; δH (300 MHz) 0.88 (3H, t, J 6.7, Me), 1.25 (26H,
br s, CH2), 2.26–2.35 (4H, m, COCH2), 3.22–3.74 (7H, m,
2 × COCH2CH2 and OCH2CH), 4.83–4.93 (4H, m, PhCH2),
7.30–7.37 (10H, m, 2 × Ph), 9.03 and 9.41 (2H, br s, NH)
(Found: C, 70.58; H, 9.42; N, 4.56. Calc. for C36H56N2O6: C,
70.56; H, 9.72; N, 4.57%).
References
1 For reviews, see; (a) E. Bakker, P. Bühlmann and E. Pretsch, Chem.
Rev., 1997, 97, 3083; (b) P. Bühlmann, E. Pretsch and E. Bakker,
Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1593.
2 (a) G. W. Gokel, Crown Ethers and Cryptands, Monographs in
Supramolecular Chemistry, ed. J. F. Stoddart, The Royal Society
of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1991; (b) J. S. Bradshow, R. M. Izatt,
A. V. Bordunov, C. Y. Zhu and J. K. Hathaway, Comprehensive
Supramolecular Chemistry, ed. G. W. Gokel, Pergamon, Oxford,
1996, vol. 1, p. 35.
3 D. Siswanta, M. Kin, H. Hisamoto and K. Suzuki, Chem. Lett.,
1996, 1011.
4 For reviews, see; (a) J. Scheerder, J. F. J. Engbersen and
D. N. Reinhoudt, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1996, 115,
307; (b) F. P. Schmidtchen and M. Berger, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97,
1609.
5 (a) F. Z. E. Aamrani, A. Sastre, M. Aguilar, L. Beyer and A. Florido,
Anal. Chim. Acta, 1996, 329, 247; (b) E. Bakker, Sens. Actuators B,
1996, 35–36, 20.
6 (a) S. Daunert and L. G. Bachas, Anal. Chem., 1989, 61, 499;
(b) R. Yuan, Y.-Q. Chai, D. Liu, D. Gao, J.-Z. Li and R.-Q. Yu,
Anal. Chem., 1993, 65, 2572.
7 (a) M. Huser, W. E. Morf, K. Fluri, K. Seiler, P. Schulthess and
W. Simon, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1990, 73, 1481; (b) E. Bakker,
E. Malinowska, R. D. Schiller and M. E. Meyerhoff, Talanta, 1994,
41, 881.
Hg2؉–2b complex
The Hg2ϩ–2b complex was prepared by shaking a CHCl3 solu-
tion of 2b several times with aq. Hg(NO3)2. The organic phase
was collected, and the solvent was evaporated to dryness.
The formation of the complex was confirmed by 1H NMR
spectroscopy, δH (300 MHz) 0.88 (3H, t, J 6.6, Me), 1.26 (26H,
br s, CH2), 2.30–2.38 (4H, m, COCH2), 3.23–3.74 (7H, m,
2 × COCH2CH2 and OCH2CH), 4.79–4.90 (4H, m, PhCH2),
7.26–7.36 (10H, m, 2 × Ph). The disappearance of the two
kinds of NH protons clearly shows the formation of the
complex.
8 (a) S. B. Park, W. Matuszewski, M. E. Meyerhoff, Y. H. Liu and
K. M. Kadish, Electroanalysis, 1991, 3, 909; (b) I. J. Yoon, J. H. Shin,
I. R. Paeng, H. Nam, G. S. Cha and K.-J. Paeng, Anal. Chim. Acta,
1998, 367, 175.
9 (a) M. Rothmaier and W. Simon, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1993, 271,
135; (b) M. Rothmaier, U. Schaller, W. E. Morf and
E. Pretsch, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1996, 327, 17; (c) I. H. A. Badr,
M. Diaz, M. F. Hawthorne and L. G. Bachas, Anal. Chem., 1999, 71,
1371.
10 (a) D. M. Pranitis and M. E. Meyerhoff, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1989,
217, 123; (b) S. Daunert, A. Florido, J. Bricker, W. Dunaway,
L. G. Bachas and M. Valiente, Electroanalysis, 1993, 5, 839;
(c) I. H. A. Badr, M. E. Meyerhoff and S. S. M. Hassan, Anal.
ESI-MS measurement
ESI-MS spectra were recorded on a Hitachi M-1200 mass
spectrometer with an M-1206 ES probe. Stock solutions (2.7
mmol dmϪ3) of receptors 1 and 2a were prepared in PriOH.
Stock solutions (2.7 mmol dmϪ3) of AgNO3, Hg(AcO)2ؒH2O,
Ca(NO3)2ؒ4H2O and Ca(AcO)2ؒH2O were prepared in MeOH.
The sample solutions were prepared by mixing the receptor and
the cation stock solutions in suitable volumetric ratios. When
the samples containing only the receptor or the Hg2ϩ–receptor
complexes were investigated, 1.1 mmol dmϪ3 NaNO3 solution
1370
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 1366–1371