Fig. 3 Titration curves of 1 against sugars, measured in phosphate buffer–
Fig. 1 Titration curves of 1 against the pH in absence and presence of sugars,
lex = 350 nm.
methanol (2+1 v/v) at pH 7.0, lex = 350 nm. Probe concentration: 5 3 1026
M.
Fig. 1. Nearly a 30-fold increase in the fluorescence intensity
can be observed at 485 nm.
values obtained with donor–acceptor chromophores involving
the boronic acid group.6,7 The higher affinity of the mono-
boronic acid 1 for fructose in comparison with glucose and the
high concentration range of practical usefulness of 1 for glucose
would not be suitable for glucose sensing in biological samples
and/or in the presence of fructose but could find applications in
the food industry and/or in fermentation industry where high
concentrations of glucose are used.
In addition to the observed changes in the steady-state
emission properties of 1, we have also observed changes in the
fluorescence lifetime of the probes. The neutral structure, 1,
shows a monoexponential fluorescence decay with a lifetime of
1.7 ns while the anionic form 2 possesses a lifetime of 3.7 ns,
also monoexponential. At pH 7, the presence of fructose
changes the fluorescence lifetime of the probe from 2.8 to 3.6
ns. Fluorescence lifetime changes are useful for sensing and
monitoring since they are independent of the total intensity and
independent also from the power of the excitation source and
the concentration of the probe.10
Usually, the effects of sugars are observed since the boronic
acid–sugar complex (structure 3 from Scheme 2) has a lower
pKa than the uncomplexed boronic acid. At a selected pH, it is
possible to have a predominance of the neutral form (1) in
absence of sugar and a predominance of the anionic form (4) in
presence of sugar. This conformational change of the boron
group, induced by the presence of sugar, is the origin of the
spectral changes observed. Titration curves of 1 in presence of
the sugar are displayed in Fig. 1. The observed pKa of 1 is 7.8
in absence of sugar, pKas of 5.6 and 6.5 are obtained in presence
of fructose and glucose, respectively. Maximum changes
between the titration curves with and without sugar are obtained
at pH 6.5 and 7.0 for fructose and glucose, respectively. Since
the spectral changes induced by sugar are not so different
between these two pH values, we performed our measurements
at pH 7.0 for all saccharides. It is also interesting to note that
large spectral changes could also be observed at a pH higher
than 9.0 as seen in Fig. 1. This suggests that probe 1 could also
be used for monitoring sugar at high pH.
The effect of fructose on the emission band of 1 is displayed
in Fig. 2. As observed for the pH, the presence of the sugar
induces a blue shift and an increase in the fluorescence intensity.
An isosbestic point is observed at 615 nm showing the
equilibrium of the two conformations, the neutral and anionic
form of the boronic acid. The same isosbestic point was
observed in the pH effects on the emission band. The increase of
the emission intensity is about 5-fold in the presence of fructose
and about 3-fold in the presence of galactose and glucose.
Titration curves of 1 against sugars are displayed in Fig. 3.
Dissociation constants (KD) of 1 were calculated at 1.9 0.1
mM for fructose and 14 1 and 37 3 mM for galactose and
glucose, respectively. KD values are comparable to previous
The authors wish to acknowledge the Juvenile Diabetes
Foundation, 1-2000-546, and the NIH National Center for
Research Resources, RR-08119, for financial support.
Notes and references
† Selected data for
1 5-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-2-[4-(dihydroxybor-
anyl)phenyl]oxazole: yellow solid, yield 48%, dH(300 MHz; CD3OD) 2.83
(6 H, s), 6.59 (2H, d), 7.05 (1H, s), 7.40 (2H, d), 7.52 (1H, s), 7.67 (1H, s)
and 7.82 (2H, s).
‡ Synthesised from 4A-dimethylaminoacetophenone (TCI America) accord-
ing to the standard procedure described in the litterature.11,12
1 J. H. Hartley, T. D. James and C. J. Ward, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 2000, 3155.
2 The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group,
Diabetes, 1997, 46, 271.
3 A. Heller, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 1999, 1, 153.
4 J. P. Lorand and J. O. Edwards, J. Org. Chem., 1959, 24, 769.
5 T. D. James, K. Sandanayake and S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1996, 35, 1911.
6 N. DiCesare and J. R. Lakowicz, J. Phys. Chem., 2001, 105, 6834.
7 N. DiCesare and J. R. Lakowicz, J. Photochem. Photobiol,. A, 2001,
143(1), 39
8 B. Valeur, Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, ed. J. R. Lakowicz,
Plenum Press, New York, 1994, vol. 4, pp. 21–50.
9 Z. Diwu, Y. Lu, C. Zhang, D. H. Klaubert and R. P. Haugland,
Photochem. Photobiol., 1997, 66, 424.
10 H. Szmacinski and J. R. Lakowicz, Topics in Fluorescence Spectros-
copy, ed. J. R. Lakowicz, Plenum Press, New York, 1994, vol. 4, pp.
295–334.
11 Z. Diwu, C. Beachdel and D. H. Klaubert, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
Fig. 2 Effect of fructose on the emission of 1, measured in phosphate
buffer–methanol (2+1 v/v) at pH 7.0, lex = 350 nm. Probe concentration:
5 3 1026 M.
4987.
12 C. M. Suter, S. Schalit and R. A. Cutler, J. Am. Chem.. Soc., 1953, 75,
4330.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2022–2023
2023