Table 1. Metabolism of Host-Selective Toxins (HST) Destruxin B (1) and Homodestruxin B (2) by Leaves of Sinapis alba, Cultivar
Ochre (resistant to A. brassicae), and Brassica napus, Cultivar Westar (susceptible to A. brassicae)
HST conversion (%)
per leafb determined by HPLCc
% of total radioactivity
recovered per leafb (LSC)
HST
(radioactivitya
added per leafb)
incubation
period
Ochre
Westar
Ochre
Westar
destruxin B (1)
(1.44 × 105)
0 h
22 ( 8
no conversion
97 ( 2
97 ( 4
24 h
48 h
72 h
0 h
87 ( 25
complete conversion
complete conversion
43 ( 2
no conversion
3 ( 4
6 ( 3
no conversion
96 ( 4
82 ( 7
93 ( 3
92 ( 1
81 ( 21
96 ( 3
95 ( 2
93 ( 3
homodestruxin B
(2) (1.22 × 105)
24 h
48 h
72 h
97 ( 2
90 ( 20
complete conversion
no conversion
4 ( 3
76 ( 11
77 ( 21
70 ( 8
92 ( 1
91 ( 1
93 ( 5
9 ( 6
a Units are in disintegration per minute (dpm). b Results are averages of experiments conducted in triplicate. c HPLC analysis as described in footnote 13;
areas of peaks determined in counts and converted to dpm utilizing a calibration curve. The total HPLC peak areas were within 10-20% of the LSC total
counting.
To isolate the metabolites, scale-up experiments were carried
out with nonlabeled destruxins utilizing ca. 300 leaves per
toxin (1 mL per leaf, 2 × 10-5 M in 2% aqueous CH3CN,
v/v). Following an incubation period of 48 h, the leaves were
extracted with EtOAc and the extracts fractionated, while
monitoring the presence of metabolites A and B by HPLC.
Multiple chromatographic fractionations yielded ca. 2 mg
of each metabolite.14 HR-EIMS analysis of metabolite A
(C30H51N5O8) indicated an additional oxygen compared to
singlets at δH 1.33, δC 31.4 and δH 1.30, δC 29.5 and an
additional quaternary carbon at δC 70.0. Thus, the spectro-
scopic data suggested that metabolite A contained a hydroxyl
group located either at the valyl or at the 2-hydroxy-3-
methylpentanoyl residue. Further proton-decoupling experi-
ments allowed the unambiguous assignment of structure 3
to metabolite A. Similarly, the spectroscopic data of me-
tabolite B obtained from homodestruxin B indicated it to
have structure 4. Although structures of at least 30 destruxins
are known,16 neither compound 3 or 4 appears to have been
previously reported. As expected, parallel experiments carried
out with leaves of B. napus and S. alba incubated under
similar conditions but without destruxins did not allow
detection of metabolites 3 or 4.
1
destruxin B (C30H51N5O7). H and 13C NMR spectroscopic
data15 of metabolite A (3) were very similar to those of
destruxin B except for the presence of two distinct methyl
(10) Prepared in 65% overall yield from Cbz-MeAla-NHNH-Boc, Cbz-
MeIle-OH, and Cbz-Ile-OH using PyBrop/DIEA for coupling.9
(11) Liquid scintillation counting was performed on a Beckman LS-6500
connected to a Wyse WY-370 data system, and results are quench corrected
and reported in dpm.
8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.07-1.91 (m, 4H), 1.87 (dd, 15, 3 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (ddd, J )
13.5, 7.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.33 (s, 3H), 1.31 (d, J ) 5 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H),
1.26 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J ) 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (d, J ) 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (d,
J ) 7 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (t, J ) 7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) δ
173.8 (s), 173.6 (s), 171.3 (s), 171.2 (s), 170.0 (s), 169.9 (s), 71.1 (d), 70.0
(s), 61.0 (d), 58.3 (d), 55.7 (d), 53.9 (d), 46.7 (t), 43.2 (t), 37.7 (d), 34.8 (t),
33.4 (t), 31.4 (q), 31.1 (q), 29.5 (q), 29.2 (t), 28.3 (q), 27.5 (d), 24.6 (t),
24.3 (t), 20.2 (q), 19.9 (q), 15.6 (q), 15.4 (q), 11.6 (q); EIMS m/z (%) 609
(M+, 10), 552 (28), 86 (60), 70 (100); HREIMS m/z calcd for C30H51N5O8
(609.3738), found 609.3735; FTIR (cm-1) 3382, 3300, 2966, 1729, 1668,
1631, 1516, 1442, 1182. Spectroscopic data of metabolite B (4): HPLC tR
) 12.2 min; [R]24D ) -196 (c 0.14, MeOH); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 8.23 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J ) 9 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (br q, J ) 6.5 Hz,
1H), 5.17 (dd, J ) 8.5, 3 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (d, J ) 11 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (dd, J )
9, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (d, J ) 7 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (m, 1H), 3.90 (br t, J ) 9 Hz,
1H), 3.61 (br q, J ) 9 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (s, 3H), 3.08 (dddd, J ) 13.5, 11.5,
2, 2 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (s, 3H), 2.68 (ddd, J ) 18.5, 11, 2 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (ddd,
J ) 18.5, 5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (m, 1H), 2.11 (dd, 15, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.07-
1.91 (m, 5H), 1.87 (dd, 15, 3 Hz, 1H), 1.50-1.37 (m, 2H), 1.32 (s, 3H),
1.30 (d, J ) 5.5 Hz, 3H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.28 (m, 1H), 0.93 (m, 1H), 0.91
(m, 3H), 0.86 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (d, J ) 6.5 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR
(75.5 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.8 (s), 173.6 (s), 171.3 (s, 2×), 169.9 (s, 2×),
71.1 (d), 70.1 (s), 61.0 (d), 57.0 (d), 55.7 (d), 53.9 (d), 46.7 (t), 43.2 (t),
37.7 (d), 34.8 (t), 33.8 (d), 33.4 (t), 31.4 (q), 31.2 (q), 29.5 (q), 29.2 (t),
28.3 (q), 26.0 (t), 24.7 (t), 24.3 (t), 16.5 (q), 15.6 (q), 15.4 (q), 11.6 (q),
11.3 (q); EIMS m/z (%) 623 (M+, 12), 566 (28), 524 (18), 467 (10), 196
(14), 100 (100); HREIMS m/z calcd for C31H53N5O8 (623.3894), found
623.3891; FTIR (cm-1) 3385, 3297, 2961, 1730, 1672, 1631, 1514, 1441,
1230, 1182.
(12) Leaves were cut at the base of their petiole and immediately placed
in Eppendorf tubes containing the 14C-toxin (1 mL of 2.0 × 10-5
Μ
dissolved in 2% aqueous CH3CN). After the solution was taken up (this
time ) t0), an additional 0.5 mL of H2O was added to ensure the complete
uptake of compound. Leaves were incubated in a growth chamber under
fluorescent lighting (16-h light (22 °C)/8-h dark (18 °C) cycle) for 12, 24,
48, 72, or 96 h, keeping the petiole immersed in dd H2O.
(13) HPLC analysis was carried out with a high performance Hewlett-
Packard liquid chromatograph equipped with quaternary pump, automatic
injector, and photodiode array detector (wavelength range 190-600 nm)
connected with a Canberra Packard Radiomatic 150TR flow scintillation
analyzer (fitted with a 210 µL high performance flow cell Solarscint),
degasser, and a Hypersil ODS column (5 µm particle size silica, 4.6 i.d. ×
200 mm), equipped with an in-line filter. Mobile phase: 75% H2O-25%
CH3CN to 100% CH3CN, for 35 min, linear gradient, and a flow rate 1.0
mL/min. The 14C counting window was 15-100 keV with an update time
of 6 s.
(14) The EtOAc residue was fractionated by multiple column chroma-
tography (C-18 reversed phase silica gel, J. T. Baker, 40 µm) eluting with
acetonitrile-water, gradient elution 30:70 to 100:0. The fractions were
combined after HPLC analysis and further fractionated by PTLC on silica
gel, 250 µm, developed in acetone-hexane (65:35) to yield chromato-
graphically homogeneous material (TLC and HPLC).
(15) Spectroscopic data of metabolite A (3): HPLC tR ) 10.2 min;
25.5
1
[R]D
) -255 (c 0.10, MeOH); H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (d,
J ) 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J ) 9 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (br q, J ) 7 Hz, 1H), 5.17
(dd, J ) 8.5, 3 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (d, J ) 11 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (dd, J ) 9, 6.5 Hz,
1H), 4.66 (d, J ) 7 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (m, 1H), 3.90 (br t, J ) 9 Hz, 1H), 3.61
(br q, J ) 9 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 3.08 (dddd, J ) 13.5, 11.5, 2, 2 Hz,
1H), 2.72 (s, 3H), 2.68 (ddd, J ) 18.5, 11, 2 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (ddd, J ) 18.5,
5, 2 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (m, 1H), 2.32 (dsept, J ) 11, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (dd, 15,
(16) All the destruxins reported so far were isolated from diverse fungal
species; for recent reports see, for example: (a) Krasnoff, S. B.; Gibson,
D. M. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 485. (b) Cai, P.; Smith, D.; Katz, B.; Pearce,
C.; Venables, D.; Houck, D. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 290.
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 10, 1999
1657