Cytotoxic Cyclic Depsipeptide from Lyngbya
J ournal of Natural Products, 2002, Vol. 65, No. 1 31
over MgSO4 and the solvent removed in vacuo to yield 151
mg (69%) of compound 2: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (carbon position,
integration, multiplicity; J in Hz) 0.80 (4, 3H, t; 7.87), 1.30
(7/8/9, 9H, s), 1.42 (3, 2H, m), 3.38 (2, 1H, m), 3.42 (1, 2H, m),
5.07 (OH, 1H, br. s); 13C NMR δ 64.0 (1), 53.8 (2), 24.3 (3),
10.2 (4), 156.7 (5), 79.6 (6), 28.2 (7/8/9).
HPLC, comparing the retention times of the components of
the hydrolyzate with those of authentic standards [Column
Chirex Phase 3126 (D) (4.6 × 250 mm), Phenomenex; solvent
2 mM CuSO4 for Ala and N-Me-Val, CuSO4-MeCN (95:5) for
lactic acid and 3-aminopentanoic acid and CuSO4-MeCN (85:
15) for N-Me-Phe, flow rate 1 mL/min, except alanine 0.8 mL/
min; detection at 254 nm]. The retention times (tR, min) of the
standards were L-Ala (12.1), D-Ala (16.8), N-Me-L-Val (20.5),
N-Me-D-Val (26.5), L-lactic acid (18.5), D-lactic acid (31.5),
N-Me-L-Phe (28.3), N-Me-D-Phe (29.9), (S)-3-aminopentanoic
acid (8.2), and (R)-3-aminopentanoic acid (13.0). The retention
times of the amino acid components of the hydrolyzate were
(S)-3-aminopentanoic acid (8.0), L-Ala (11.8), L-lactic acid
(18.5), N-Me-L-Val (20.5), and N-Me-L-Phe (28.3). The identi-
ties of the peaks were also confirmed by co-injection.
(R)-N-Boc-2-a m in obu ta n ol Tosyla te (3).16 A 151 mg
sample of 2 was dissolved in 1 mL of freshly distilled pyridine,
and the solution was stirred at 0 °C while 293 mg of
toluenesulfonyl chloride (2 molar equiv) was slowly added. The
reaction mixture was stored at -4 °C for 3 days and then
poured over 30 mL of ice in a 60 mL separatory funnel and
extracted with 30 mL of diethyl ether. The organic layer was
subsequently washed with 6 N HCl followed by saturated
aqueous NaHCO3 and saturated aqueous sodium chloride. The
organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to yield
263 mg (100%) of 3: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (carbon position,
integration, multiplicity; J in Hz) 0.79 (4, 3H, t; 7.3), 1.32 (7/
8/9, 9H, s), 1.40 (3, 2H, m), 2.36 (16, 3H, s), 3.49 (2, 1H, m)
3.94 (1, 2H, m), 7.70 (12/14, 2H, d, 7.1), 7.23 (11/15, 2H, d;
7.8); 13C NMR δ (carbon position) 71.3 (1), 65.9 (2), 24.4 (3),
10.4 (4), 155.3 (5), 79.6 (6), 28.5 (7/8/9), 145.0 (10), 128.0 (11/
15), 130.0 (12/14), 158.3 (13), 21.8 (16).
(R)-N-Boc-3-a m in op en ta n itr ile (4). To 250 mg of 3 in 2
mL of wet DMSO was added 43 mg of NaCN with stirring.
The reaction was left at room temperature overnight and then
partitioned between diethyl ether and water. The ether layer
was evaporated and the residue chromatographed on silica gel
using 10:1 hexane-ethyl acetate to afford 66 mg (44%) of 4:
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (carbon position, integration, multiplicity;
J in Hz) 0.90 (5, 3H, t; 7.3), 1.39 (8/9/10, 9H, s), 1.49 (4, 2H,
m), 2.46 (2, 1H, dd; -16.1, 5.1), 2.68 (2, 1H, dd; -16.1, 4.6),
3.62 (3, 1H, m); 13C NMR δ (carbon position) 117.4 (1), 40.9
(2), 49.0 (3), 23.5 (4), 10.4 (5), 155.3 (6), 79.9 (7), 28.4 (8/9/10).
(R)-3-Am in op en ta n itr ile (5).9 A solution of 66 mg (0.3
mmol) of 4 in 1 mL of concentrated trifluoroacetic acid was
stirred for 10 min. Evaporation of the solvent under N2 and
partitioning of the residue between EtOAc and water yielded
30 mg (92%) of 5 from the aqueous phase: 1H NMR (MeOH-
d4) δ (carbon position, integration, multiplicity; J in Hz) 1.09
(5, 3H, t; 7.6), 1.85 (4, 2H, m), 2.98 (2, 2H, d; 5.6), 3.51 (3, 1H,
m); 13C NMR δ (carbon position) 115.8 (1), 25.4 (2), 49.3 (3),
20.3 (4), 8.5 (5).
Ack n ow led gm en t. This research was supported by NC-
NPDDG grant CA53001 from the National Cancer Institute.
We are grateful to the Commonwealth of the Northern
Marianas for a marine research permit. J ohn Starmer collected
the cyanobacterium, and Edwin Cruz-Rivera assisted in the
identification. Dr. M. Lieberman and G. Tien, University of
Hawaii, Department of Chemistry, carried out bioassays. The
UCR Mass Spectrometry Facility, Department of Chemistry,
University of California, performed mass spectral analyses at
Riverside.
Refer en ces a n d Notes
(1) Sticher, O.; Heilmann, J .; J aki, B. J . Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1283-1285.
(2) Koehn, F. E.; Longley, R. E.; Reed, J . K. J . Nat. Prod. 1992, 55, 613-
619.
(3) Cragg, G. M.; Newman, D. J .; Snader, K. M. J . Nat. Prod. 1997, 60,
52-60.
(4) Trimurtulu, G.; Ohtani, I.; Patterson, G. M. L.; Moore, R. E.; Corbett,
T. H.; Valeriote, F. A.; Demchik, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
4729-4737.
(5) Moore, R. E. Pure Appl. Chem. 1982, 54, 1919-1934.
(6) Corbett, T. H.; Valeriote, F. A.; Polin, L.; Panchapor, C.; Pugh, S.;
White, K.; Lowichik, N.; Knight, J .; Bissery, M.-C.; Wozniak, A.;
LoRusso, P.; Biernat, L.; Polin, D.; Knight, L.; Biggar, S.; Looney,
D.; Demchik, L.; J ones J .; J ones, L.; Blair, S.; Palmer, K.; Essenma-
cher, S.; Lisow, L.; Mattes, K. C.; Cavanaugh, P. F.; Rake, J . B.; Baker,
L. In Cytotoxic Anticancer Drugs: Models and Concepts for Drug
Discovery and Development; Valeriote, F. A., Corbett, T. H., Baker,
L. H., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, 1992; pp 35-87.
(7) After NMR characterization, FABMS indicated a second compound
was present in the sample (FABMS m/z ) 1408). Further HPLC
purification using MeOH yielded pure 1 as described above, but it
was this other minor compound which was responsible for most of
the activity. Unfortunately too little material was isolated (<200 µg)
for characterization of the compound, which exhibited cytotoxicity
<1 µg/mL against the KB cell line.
(8) For representative examples see: (a) Sone, H.; Kigoshi, H.; Yamada,
K. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 8149-8154. (b) Luesch, H.; Yoshida, W.
Y.; Moore, R. E.; Paul, V. J .; Mooberry, S. L. J . Nat. Prod. 2000, 63,
611-615. (c) Pettit, G. R.; Kamano, Y.; Brown, P.; Gust, D.; Inoue,
M.; Herald, C. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 905-907. (d) Ojika,
M.; Nemoto, T.; Nakmura, M.; Yamada, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 5057-5058.
(R)-3-Am in op en ta n oic Acid Hyd r och lor id e (6). A solu-
tion of 30 mg of 5 in 1 mL of 6 N HCl was refluxed overnight.
Purification over DOWEX 50 resin eluting with 1 M HCl
resulted in 40 mg (87%) of 6: IR (Nujol) νmax 3415 (s), 3300
(s), 3100 (br), 1712 (s); H NMR (MeOH) δ (carbon position,
integration, multiplicity; J in Hz) 0.98 (5, 3H, t; 7.8), 1.72 (4,
2H, m), 2.69 (2, 1H, dd; -17.3, 4.7), 2.84 (2, 1H, dd; -17.3,
8.3), 3.6 (3, 1H, m), 7.01,7.19, 7.36 (NH3).
(S)-3-Am in open ta n oic Acid Hyd r och lor id e. The S enan-
tiomer was synthesized in the same manner as described above
starting with (S)-2-aminobutanol.
L a n d D-La ctic Acid .9 A solution of L-Ala (100 mg) in 1
mL of 4 N HCl at 4 °C was treated with excess sodium nitrite
(500 mg in 1 mL of water) and left to stir overnight. The
mixture was repeatedly extracted with ethyl ether and evapo-
rated to dryness to give L-lactic acid. D-Lactic acid was
prepared in the same manner from the enantiomer.
(9) Golakoti, T.; Ogino, J .; Heltzel, C. E.; Husebo, T. L.; J ensen, C. M.;
Larsen, L. K.; Patterson, G. M. L.; Moore, R. E.; Mooberry, S. L.;
Corbett, T. H.; Valeriote, F. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12030-
12049.
(10) Carter, D. C.; Moore, R. E.; Mynderse, J . S.; Niemczura, W. P.; Todd,
J . S. J . Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 236-241.
Ch ir a l TLC a n a lysis. The acid hydrolyzate of 1 was
subjected to TLC analysis on Chiralplate (Macherey-Nagel)
using 1:9 MeOH-CH2Cl2 as the developing solvent. With V2O5
spray reagent17 the lactic acid was visualized as an intense
blue spot. Authentic L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid showed Rf
values of 0.63 and 0.60, respectively. The L-lactic acid in the
hydrolyzate had an Rf of 0.63.
Ozon olysis a n d Acid Hyd r olysis of Obya n a m id e (1).
For analysis, 200 µg of 1 was dissolved in 1 mL of CH2Cl2 and
ozonized for 15 min. The residue was dissolve in 400 µL of 6
N HCl and refluxed at 118 °C for 16 h. After evaporation of
the solvent the sample was passed over a C18 column (100 mg)
with 10% CH3CN.
(11) Pettit, G. R.; Kamano, Y.; Kizu, H.; Dufresne, C.; Herald, C. L.;
Bontems, R. J .; Schmidt, J . M.; Boettner, F. E.; Nieman, R. A.
Heterocycles 1989, 28, 553-558.
(12) Harrigan, G. G.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Moore, R. E.; Nagle, D. G.; Park, P.
U.; Biggs, J .; Paul, V. J .; Mooberry, S. L.; Corbett, T. H.; Valeriote,
F. A. J . Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1221-1225.
(13) Pettit, G. R.; Xu, J .; Hogan, F.; Williams, M. D.; Doubek, D. L.;
Schmidt, J . M.; Cerny, R. L.; Boyd, M. R. J . Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 752-
754.
(14) Sone, H.; Nemoto, T.; Ishiwata, H.; Ojika, M.; Yamada, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 8449-8452.
(15) Kocienski, P. S. Protecting Groups; Gutmann &Co GmbH: New York,
1994; pp 193-5.
(16) Tietze, L. Reactions and Synthesis in the Organic Chemistry Labora-
tory; University Science Books; Mill Valley, CA, 1989; pp 437-438.
(17) Klaus, R.; Fisher, W. Chromatographia 1989, 23, 137-140.
Absolu te Ster eoch em istr y of th e Am in o Acid Der ived
Un its. After hydrolysis the mixture was analyzed by Chiral
NP0102253