3342 Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 16, 2002
Amoroso et al.
Ru Cl(d cyp b)(µ-Cl)3Ru (d cyp b)(CdCHBu t) (4a ). An or-
ange suspension of 3 (180 mg, 0.14 mmol) in 5 mL of benzene
was treated with 3,3-dimethyl-1-butyne (52.2 µL, 0.32 mmol).
The suspension was stirred at 22 °C for 12 h, over which time
it darkened slightly but did not dissolve. Concentration and
addition of pentane (2 mL) afforded more of the orange solid,
which was filtered off, washed with pentane (3 × 1 mL), and
of formation, points toward a major catalyst deactivation
pathway in this chemistry.
Con clu sion s
The foregoing describes an efficient route to the
hydrido chloro dimer RuCl(dcypb)(µ-Cl)2(µ-H)Ru(dcypb)-
(H2) and utilization of this species and the closely
related chlororuthenium dimer RuCl(dcypb)(µ-Cl)3Ru-
(dcypb)(N2) as atom-efficient entry points into dcypb
chemistry. Dinuclear monoalkylidene, monovinylidene,
and mono(hydroxy)vinylidene derivatives were isolated
on reaction of the parent dimers with an excess of the
appropriate alkyne. In no case were mononuclear or
disubstituted dinuclear derivatives obtained. While
formation of vinylidene and hydroxyvinylidene species
of the type RuCl(dcypb)(µ-Cl)3Ru(dcypb)(L) may be an
artifact of the poor solubility of both the starting dimer
and these products, formation of the analogous alkyl-
idene complex from the soluble hydrido chloro precursor
indicates a strong driving force for homodimerization
of initially formed RuCl2(dcypb)(CHCHdCMe2) (2d ).
The low reactivity of the face-bridged alkylidene prod-
ucts, in conjunction with the facility with which such
dimers are formed, affords insight into an important
deactivation pathway accessible to catalysts of type 2.
We now have evidence that this process is likewise
operative for the Grubbs catalyst RuCl2(PPh3)2(CHCHd
CMe2).23b A related process, possibly involving loss of
one bulky L donor per Ru, may apply to systems of type
1. The accessibility of such deactivation pathways limits
the advantages of enhanced catalyst lifetime anticipated
from use of a robust late-transition-metal catalyst. Our
current efforts focus on development of pseudohalide
analogues of 2, which have potential for enhanced
selectivity as well as improved lifetime. The relative
stability of model edge- and face-bridged complexes is
also under investigation.
1
dried under vacuum. Yield: 161 mg (86%). H NMR (CDCl3):
4
δ 3.06 (t, RudCdCHBut, J HP ) 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.1-3.2 (br,
aliphatic, 2H), 1.24 (s, C(CH3)3, 9H), 1.0-3.0 (br, aliphatic,
2
102H). 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ 50.6, 49.6 (ABq, J PP ) 37
2
2
Hz), 45.9 (d, J PP ) 23 Hz), 40.1 (d, J PP ) 23 Hz). 13C{1H}
2
NMR (C6D6): δ 352.1 (t, RuC, J CP ) 16 Hz), 119.7 (s, RuCd
C), 33.8 (s, C(CH3)3), 15-45 (aliphatic). IR (Nujol): ν(CdC)
1633 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C62H114Cl4P4Ru2: C, 56.10; H, 8.66.
Found: C, 56.35; H, 9.04.
R u Cl(d cyp b )(µ-Cl)3R u (d cyp b )(CdCH C(OH )P h 2) (4b ).
An orange suspension of 3 (98 mg, 0.075 mmol) and 1,1-
diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (34 mg, 0.16 mmol) in 8 mL of benzene
was stirred for 12 h at 22 °C, over which time it darkened to
brown. Hexanes (4 mL) was added, and the brown solid was
filtered off, washed with hexanes (3 × 1 mL), and dried under
1
3
vacuum. Yield: 97 mg (88%). H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.51 (d, J HH
3
) 6.5 Hz, 4H, o-C6H5), 7.28 (t, J HH ) 7.5 Hz, 4H, m-C6H5),
7.18 (t, 3J HH ) 7.1 Hz, 2H, p-C6H5), 4.38 (br, RudCdCH, 1H),
3.99 (br, 1H, xch D2O, OH), 0.8-3.5 (br, aliphatic, 104H).
31P{1H} NMR (C6D6): δ 51.5 (d, J PP ) 38 Hz), 50.1 (d, J PP
)
2
2
38 Hz), 44.7 (d, unresolved), 40.9 (d, unresolved). 13C{1H} NMR
(C6D6): δ 308.7 (t, RuC, unresolved), 243.4 (s, RuCdC), 150.4
(s, RuCdCdC), 149.4-120.2 (aromatic), 53.1-14.0 (aliphatic).
IR (Nujol): ν(O-H) 3483; ν(CdC) 1644 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for
C
71H114Cl4P4Ru2: C, 58.67; H, 8.04. Found: C, 59.07; H, 8.34.
Ru (H)(d cyp b)(µ-Cl)2(µ-H)Ru (d cyp b)(H2) (5). An orange
suspension of 3 (20 mg, 31.4 µmol Ru) in C6D6 (1 mL) was
stirred under 1 atm of H2 for 5 min at 22 °C, following which
a C6D6 solution (1 mL; H2-saturated) of KHBsBu3 (32 µL of a
1.0 M solution in Et2O) was added by cannula. A clear, slightly
darker orange solution formed within minutes. NMR analysis
was carried out by transferring the solution by cannula into a
Teflon-lined screw-cap NMR tube filled with H2. Attempts to
isolate the products, or indeed to handle them in the absence
of H2, resulted in extensive decomposition (NMR). We have
reported the crystal structure of one of the decomposition
products, [Ru(H)(dcypb)(µ-Cl)3Ru(dcypb)(N2)] (7).19 A few small
crystals of 5 formed at the solvent-gas interface over several
days under H2, one of which was found suitable for X-ray
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. All reactions were carried out at
room temperature (22 °C) under N2 using standard Schlenk
or drybox techniques, unless stated otherwise. All reactions
with H2 were carried out under 1 atm pressure. Dry, oxygen-
free solvents were obtained using an Anhydrous Engineering
solvent purification system and stored over Linde 4 Å molec-
ular sieves. CDCl3, C6D6, and toluene-d8 were dried over
activated sieves (Linde 4 Å) and degassed by consecutive
freeze/pump/thaw cycles. RuCl(dcypb)(µ-Cl)3Ru(dcypb)(N2)
(3)5b and phenyldiazomethane28 were prepared as previously
described. Norbornene was purchased from Aldrich and dis-
tilled from sodium under N2. Potassium tri(sec-butyl)boro-
hydride, 3,3-dimethyl-1-butyne, 3-chloro-3-methyl-1-butyne,
1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol, and trimethylsilyl trifluoromethane-
sulfonate (TMS-OTf) were purchased from Aldrich and used
1
analysis. H NMR (C6D6): δ 0.6-3.0 (m, aliphatic), -13.8 (s,
H, H2). 31P NMR (C6D6): δ 65.1 (br s), 52.2 (br s). Hydride T1
min (C7D8, H2, 500 MHz, 284 K): 38 ms. IR (Nujol): ν(Ru-H)
2102 (m), 2066 (m) cm-1
.
Ru 2Cl4(d cyp b)2[CHCHdC(CH3)2] (4c + 8). A suspension
of 3 (186 mg, 0.29 mmol Ru) in 10 mL of toluene under H2
was treated with KHBsBu3 (292 µL of a 1.0 M solution in Et2O).
Over 3 h at 22 °C the suspension gave way to a dark orange
solution consisting solely of 5 (NMR evidence). Addition of a
solution of 3-chloro-3-methyl-1-butyne (66 µL, 0.58 mmol) in
2 mL of toluene caused immediate darkening of the solution
to green-brown. After 1 h of reaction, 31P{1H} NMR showed
complete conversion to two products, in a ratio of 4:1. The
major product can be unambiguously identified as RuCl-
(dcypb)(µ-Cl)3Ru(dcypb)(CHCHdCMe2] (4c). The second prod-
uct (8) is proposed to be an isomer containing a bridging
alkylidene (see text). Identical results were obtained on use
of a larger excess of the alkyne (20 equiv) or on carrying out
the reaction at -35 °C. The solution was filtered through Celite
and concentrated. Addition of hexanes resulted in a brown
precipitate, which was filtered off, washed with pentane (5 ×
1 mL), and then reprecipitated from benzene-hexanes.
Yield: 158 mg (82%). Repeated efforts to separate 4c and 8
by reprecipitation from other solvent mixtures (using various
combinations of hexanes, pentane, or 2-propanol with benzene,
1
as received. H NMR (200, 300, or 500 MHz), 31P NMR (121
MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) spectra were recorded on a
Varian Gemini 200, Bruker Avance-300, or Bruker AMX-500
spectrometer. All 2D experiments were carried out on the
Avance-300 instrument. IR spectra were measured on
a
Bomem MB100 IR spectrometer. Microanalyses were carried
out inhouse, using a Perkin-Elmer Series II CHNS/O instru-
ment, and by Guelph Chemical Laboratories Ltd., Guelph,
Ontario, Canada.
(28) Creary, X. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: Toronto, 1990; Vol. VII,
p 438.