2272
K. Ohsumi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 2269–2272
excretion in rats. This discrepancy was thought to be due to
the difference in stability between glucoside 11 andT-1095A
in rats. Optimization of O-glucoside 11 is now underway to
improve stability and selectivity against SGLTs.
J=11.4), 4.69 (1H, d, J=11.1), 4.54 (1H, d, J=11.1), 4.49
(1H, d, J=11.1), 4.46 (1H, d, J=11.1), 4.12 (1H, d, J=9.6),
3.98 (1H, t, J=8.4), 3.80 (2H, d, J=3.0), 3.76-3.84 (2H, brd),
3.71 (1H, t, J=7.5), 3.67 (1H, t, J=6.9), 2.49 (2H, q, J=7.5),
1.12 (3H, t, J=7.5). Compound 8 (122 mg, 0.15 mmol) was
hydrogenated over 20% Pd(OH)2 (200 mg) in EtOAc(4 mL)-
methanol (4 mL) for 8 h. The catalyst was removed by fil-
tration,. The filtrate was purified by SepPack column (10%
MeOH/H2O to 100% MeOH) to give desired product 9 as
During the course of this work, compound 11 was
claimed for SGLT inhibitors (WO 0116147). To date,
details of the method of discovery have not been pub-
lished.
1
white solid (22 mg, 33%). H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d
7.09 (2H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 7.06 (2H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 5.00–5.20
(1H, br), 3.70–3.90 (3H, m), 3.52–3.65 (1H, m), 3.35–3.51 (2H,
m), 2.58 (2H, q, J=7.5 Hz), 1.19 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), ESI-
MS(m/z) 445[(M-H)ꢀ], 447[(M+H)+].
References and Notes
13. 4-(4-Ethylphenyl)methyl-5-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl-
O-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside 11. A mixture of 2,3,4,6-O-tetrabenzyl-
d-glucopyranose (107 mg, 0.39 mmol) 1,2-dihydro-4-(ethyl-
phenyl)methyl-5-trifluoromethyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 7 (214 mg,
0.39 mmol) triphenylphosphine (102 mg, 0.39 mmol) and
anhydrous THF (5 mL) were stirred in ice-water bath. To this
solution, 40% Ethyl azodicarboxylate/toluene (0.175 mL, 0.39
mmol) was added dropwise. After stirring for 24 h, the reac-
tion mixture was purified by silica-gel chromatography (25%
EtOAc–hexane) to give 40-(40-ethylphenyl)methyl-50-trifluoro-
methyl-1H-pyrazol-30 -yl-O-2,3,4,6-O-tetrabenzyl-b-d-gluco-
pyranoside 10 (223 mg, 72%) as oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 6.98–7.34 (24H, m), 5.09 (1H, anomeric, d, J=6.6),
4.46–4.88 (8H, m), 3.81 (2H, s), 3.56–3.74 (6H, m), 2.53 (2H,
q, J=7.5), 1.14 (3H, t, J=7.5). ESI-MS (m/z) 791 [(M–H)ꢀ],
793[(M+H)+].
Compound 10 (220 mg, 0.28 mmol) was hydrogenated with
20% Pd(OH)2 (100 mg) in EtOAc(4 mL)-methanol (4 mL) for
1.5 h. The catalyst was removed by filtration, and the filtrate
was evaporated. The residue was purified by silica gel chro-
matography (10% MeOH–CH2Cl2) to give desired product 11
as white solid (110 mg, 92%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d 7.08 (4H, s), 5.11(1H, brs), 5.02(1H, brs), 4.89 (1H, anomeric
d, J=8.7), 3.74 (2H, s), 3.66 (1H, d, J=12.0), 3.48 (1H, dd,
J=5.1, 12.0), 3.10-3.24 (4H, br), 2.53 (2H, q, J=7.5), 1.13
(3H, t, J=7.5). ESI-MS (m/z) 431 [(M–H)ꢀ], 863 [(2M–H)ꢀ].
14. Rat kidney BBMVs assay method
1. Lee, W.-S.; Kanai, Y.; Wells, R. G.; Hediger, M. A. J. Biol.
Chem. 1994, 269, 12032.
2. You, G.; Lee, W.-S.; Barros, E. J. G.; Kanai, Y.; Huo, T.-
L.; Khawaja, S.; Wells, R. G.; Nigam, S. K.; Heidiger, M. A.
J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 29365.
3. Mackenzie, B.; Panayotova-Heiermann, M.; Loo, D. D. F.;
Lever, J. E.; Wright, E. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 22488.
4. Tsujihara, K.; Hongu, M.; Saito, K.; Inamasu, M.; Ara-
kawa, K.; Oku, A.; Matsumoto, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996,
44, 1174.
5. Tsujihara, K.; Hongu, M.; Saito, K.; Kawanishi, H.; Kur-
iyama, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Oku, A.; Ueta, K.; Tsuda, M.;
Saito, A. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5311.
6. Oku, A.; Ueta, K.; Arakawa, K.; Ishihara, T.; Nawano,
M.; Kuronuma, Y.; Matsumoto, M.; Saito, A.; Tsujihara, K.;
Anai, M.; Asano, T.; Kanai, Y.; Endou, H. Diabetes 1999, 48,
1794.
7. Kees, K. L.; Caggiano, T. J.; Steiner, K. E.; Fitzgerald, J. J.;
Kates, M. J.; Christos, T. E.; Kulishoff, J. M.; Moore, R. D.;
McCaleb, M. L. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 617.
8. Kees, K. L.; Fitzgerald, J. J.; Steiner, K. E.; Mattes, J. F.;
Mihan, B.; Tosi, T.; Mondoro, D.; McCaleb, M. L. J. Med.
Chem. 1996, 39, 3920.
9. Dodge, J. A.; Lugar, C. W.; Cho, S.; Osborne, J. J.; Phil-
lips, D. L.; Glasebrook, A. L.; Frolik, C. A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 993.
10. Tang, B.-K. Pharmac. Ther. 1990, 46, 53.
11. Vaccaro, W. D.; Sher, R.; Davis, H. R. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 35.
Brush border membrane vesicles (BBMVs) were prepared
by the Ca2+ precipitation method from kidney of male Wistar
rats (8–10 weeks old). The test compounds, d-glucose (0.2
mM), [14C]-d-glucose (0.1 mCi) and NaCl (100 mM) were
added and incubated with BBMV’s for one min. The glucose
uptake reaction was terminated by addition of 1mM phlorizin
in 40 mM Hepes–Tris (pH 7.4). The vehicles were immediately
centrifuged and filtered, then the radioactivity on the mem-
brane was measured by a liquid scintillation counter.
12. 4-(4-Ethylphenyl)methyl-5-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl-
ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside uronic acid 9 A mixture of 2,3,4-tri-O-
benzyl-d-glucopyranoside uronic acid benzyl ester (199 mg,
0.36
mmol),1,2-dihydro-4-(ethylphenyl)methyl-5-trifluoro-
methyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 7 (99 mg, 0.37 mmol), triphenyl-
phosphine (109 mg, 0.42 mmol) and anhydrous THF (0.5 mL)
were stirred in ice-water bath. To this solution, 40% ethyl
azodicarboxylate/toluene (0.18 mL, 0.40 mmol) was added
dropwise. After 1.5 h, the reaction mixture was purified by
silica-gel chromatography (20% EtOAc–hexane) to give ben-
zyl 40-(40-ethylphenyl) methyl-50-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazol-
30-yl-2,3,4-O-tribenzyl-b-d-glucopyranouronate (127mg, 44%)
8 as yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3 ) d 7.22–7.36
(16H, m), 7.08–7.18 (4H, m), 7.07 (2H, d, J=8.7), 7.00 (2H, d,
J=8.7), 5.24 (1H, anomericd, J=6.0), 5.15 (1H, d, J=12.0),
5.10 (1H, d, J=12.0), 4.76 (1H, d, J=11.4), 4.70 (1H, d,
15. Urinary glucose excretion in rats
Test compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted by
saline. The compounds were intravenously administered to
male Wistar rats (4 week old, Charles River Japan, Tokyo,
Japan) housed in metaboliccages. Twenty-four hours after the
administration, urine was collected and urine volume was
measured. Glucose concentration in urine was measured using
an auto-analyzer (FUJI DRI-CHEM, Fuji Photo Film Co.,
Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).