8724 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 18, 2009
Misochko et al.
Chart 1
recorded with a Bruker IFS-113 V FTIR spectrometer
(spectral region from 500 to 4000 cm-1 and spectral resolu-
tion 0.5 cm-1). The closed-cycle helium refrigerator (CTI
Cryogenics) was used to maintain the sample temperature in
these experiments. Fluorine atoms were generated by F2
photolysis at 337 nm with the pulse nitrogen laser. The laser
light entered the sample chamber through a fused silica
window and impinged on the sample at an incident angle of
45ꢀ. The beam was expanded to an area of about 4 cm2 at the
sample to ensure uniform irradiation. The average laser
power was varied from 1 to 5 mW/cm2. In some experiments,
weusedthesecondharmonicofaNd:YAGlaser(Continuum
model Surelite) at 532 nm at an average laser power of
20 mW/cm2 for photolysis of the reaction products.
To distinguish the chemical reactions involving photogen-
erated F atoms from those of diffusing thermal atoms,
photolysis of F2 molecules was performed at 12 K. Fluorine
atoms are able to diffuse in solid argon at temperatures above
20 K.13-15 Earlier, we used this peculiar feature of fluorine
atoms to generate various novel radical species in solid argon
matrices.16 To initiate reactions of thermally diffusing
F atoms, we performed annealing of photolyzed samples at
temperatures above 20 K. Annealing was carried out using a
step-by-step procedure. After completion of the photolysis at
12 K, the sample was annealed 2-3 min at T > 12 K. Then,
the temperature was lowered back to 12 K, and the spectrum
was recorded. This cycle was repeated 10-12 times until the
reactionswerecomplete. Inaseparateexperiment, weverified
that the 337 and 532 nm light did not induce any changes in
the infrared spectra of the Ar/XeF2 (= 3000:1) samples.
Quantumchemical calculationshavebeenperformed using
three density functionals: the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof
(PBE) nonempirical generalized gradient approximation,17
its hybrid extension (PBE0),18 and the popular semiempirical
B3LYP model.19 The scalar-relativistic Hamiltonian,20 the
high-quality relativistic correlation-consistent basis sets
L3(F) and L33(Xe) augmented by core polarization func-
tions,21 and a density-fitting technique22 as implemented in a
recentversionofthePrirodacode23 were used. In addition, we
have tested the scalar-relativistic20 ab initio riMP2(full)
Figure 1. Infrared spectra of the Ar/XeF2/F2 (= 3000:1:2) sample at
12 K. Trace a shows IR bands of XeF2 prior to photolysis. Trace b is the
difference spectrum showing changes in the spectrum following 337 nm
photolysis at 12 K. Traces c and d are the difference spectra showing
additionalchanges occurringduringshort-termannealingofthesample at
27 K (c) and after subsequent prolonged annealing at 27 K (d). The IR
bands labeled as B were assigned to the intermediate complex [XeF2-F],
and the IR bands labeled as C were assigned to complex [XeF2-F2], see
text below.
method24 to compare with the DFT results. Molecular geo-
metries have been fully optimized (tolerance on gradient:
10-5 au), and a very fine integration grid is used for the
DFT exchange-correlation terms (accuracy: 10-8 au per
atom). Unrestrictedandrestrictedapproacheshavebeenused
for calculations of the open- and closed-shell systems, respec-
tively.
3. Results and Discussion
(13) Feld, J.; Kunttu, H.; Apkarian, V. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 1009.
(14) Alimi, K.; Gerber, R. B.; Apkarian, V. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92,
3551.
(15) Misochko, E. Ya.; Akimov, A. V.; Wight, C. A. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1998, 293, 547.
(16) (a) Misochko, E. Ya.; Benderskii, V. A.; Goldschleger, A. U.;
Akimov, A. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11997. (b) Misochko, E. Ya.;
Akimov, A. V.; Goldschleger, A. U.; Boldyrev, A. I.; Wight, C. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 405. (c) Misochko, E. Ya.; Akimov, A. V.; Wight, C. A. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1999, 103, 7972. (d) Misochko, E. Ya.; Akimov, A. V.; Goldschleger, A.
U. Uspekhi Khim. 2003, 72, 262. Misochko, E. Ya.; Akimov, A. V.; Goldschleger,
A. U. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2003, 72, 233. (e) Misochko, E. Ya.; Akimov, A. V.;
Belov, V. A.; Tyurin, D. A.; Laikov, D. N. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 084301.
(17) (a) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1966, 77,
3865. (b) Perdew, J. P.; Ernzerhof, M.; Burke, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9982.
(18) Adamo, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158.
A. Photolysis of the Samples Ar/F2/XeF2 at 12 K. The
IR spectrum of the Ar/XeF2 (= 3000:1) samples at 12 K
consists of a broad band, attributed to the isolated
molecules XeF2, with a maximum at 547 cm-1, which
corresponds to the asymmetric stretching vibrational
mode ν3 (in an argon matrix,25 ν3 =547 cm-1, and in a
gas phase,26 ν3=560.1 cm-1). Additionally, a very weak
band at 512 cm-1 is clearly seen in the spectrum that can
be ascribed to the symmetric stretching vibration of XeF2
in a matrix27 (a corresponding IR-inactive vibration
(24) (a) Feyereisen, M.; Fitzgerald, G.; Komornicki, A. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1993, 208, 359. (b) Vahtras, O; Almlof, J. E.; Feyereisen, M. W. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1993, 213, 514.
(19) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098. (b) Lee, C.; Yang, W.;
Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. (c) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98,
5648.
(25) Turner, J. J.; Pimentel, G. C. In Noble-Gas Compounds; Hyman, H. H.,
Ed.; University Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 1963; pp 101-105.
(26) (a) Agron, P. A.; Begun, G. M.; Levy, N. A.; Mason, A. A.; Jones,
S. F.; Smith, D. F. Science 1963, 139, 842. (b) Burger, H.; Ma, S. J. Mol.
Spectrosc. 1994, 164, 84.
(20) Dyall, G. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 2118.
(21) Laikov, D. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 416, 116. Electronic basis sets
are designated by the symbol Λ. In the current literature, these basis sets are
designated by the symbol L.
(22) Laikov, D. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 281, 151.
(23) Laikov, D. N.; Ustinjuk, Yu. A. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 820.
(27) Howard, W. H., Jr.; Andrews, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7862.